Lancet Publishes Damning Covid Paper, Then Deletes It
The COVID vaccines have killed massive numbers of people and the government covered it up says this paper published by The Lancet
The paper, published as a pre-print, shows 74 percent of deaths post-vax due to the vax.
Head on over to Peter McCullough’s Substack for the details and please consider subscribing to his Substack. He’s terrific, a great friend, a great scientist, and a man of great courage.
This is a pre-print so not yet peer-reviewed.
Here is the:
- Abstract
- Paper (hosted on the Daily Skeptic)
- Daily Skeptic rticle about the removal in <24 hours after being posted
The paper had about 30,000 views in 24 hours (about 20 views per minute) before The Lancet removed the paper saying:
“This preprint has been removed by Preprints with the Lancet because the study’s conclusions are not supported by the study methodology.”
What is astonishing to me is that they were able to determine that so quickly!!!
Normally, peer review takes months. The Lancet has shown that items meriting removal can be determined in just 24 hours.
But we don’t have a clue what the errors were because they didn’t tell us and they didn’t tell the authors either. They didn’t even give the authors a chance to respond!!!
They basically unilaterally decided the paper’s conclusion wasn’t supported by the methods and they weren’t interested in any response from the authors before taking action.
The paper shows 74 percent of deaths post-vax could be attributed to the vaccine being a cause of death. And most of the deaths happened within 1 week of vaccination.
The results are strongly consistent with the Schwab paper where 71 percent of the deaths appeared to be consistent with a vaccine death:
They basically were looking for the “cleanest” proof of death, but it’s likely that all 71 percent of the cases (25 out of 35) died from the vaccine, it’s just harder to “prove” that.
The question we all should be asking is why are we first hearing about these cases now?
How could all of the CDC’s analyses show no relation to the vaccine?
And why aren’t we allowed to see the CDC’s analyses?
See more here substack.com
Header image: The Guardian
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About Covid 19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Alan
| #
I have my doubts about it. Surely papers should not be made public before peer review. But one statement in it is “The mechanisms of death from COVID-19 vaccination remain largely unexplored.” There are only 240 deaths in total and this seems a small number to me compared to the number of vaccinations. If they don’t know the mechanism, how do they know what caused the death? Isn’t it for the families to raise concerns after the autopsy findings? In the UK some compensation payments have been made after the coroner confirmed that the deaths were due to the vaccines.
Reply
Ted K
| #
Pre-print papers are meant to be read critically by the community of colleauges to raise issues that may need addressing and correction before they are judged acceptable for publication by the referees of the journal. That was not done. The editors decided to supress it immediately to maintain the purity of ideology underlying the journal. The authors should have submitted it to a non USA medical journal, such as the BMJ which is much more open to dissenting but nevertheless valid views.
Reply