The Special Theory of Relativity: Circles vs Ellipses!

In this video, Steve J. Crothers explains the special Theory of Relativity which pervades modern physics and astronomy. In previous lectures on the channel Crothers has presented mathematical proof that the general Theory of Relativity is invalid.

The general Theory of Relativity is invalid because it violates the rules of pure mathematics. In this video, Crothers aims to demonstrate how special relativity also violates the rules of pure mathematics. Consequently, it has no physical meaning, this is anathema to physicists, astronomers and cosmologists but the proof is not complicated.

The proof which is unequivocal involves the Theorem of Pythagoras that is the right triangle rule which is taught to everyone in high school. Beyond that the proof utilizes the elementary geometry of a circle and an ellipse. In both cases, the distance from the origin of the coordinate system to the periphery of the geometric figure is given by the Theorem of Pythagoras.

Source: YouTube

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (7)

  • Avatar

    Herb Rose

    |

    If you ask people on the street what1 + 1 is they will answer 2. If you ask an accountant what1 + 1 is bis answer is, What do you want it to be? Math is used to prove and disprove a existing belief and is disconnected from reality. No where do we see the speed of flight as constant, no where do we see particles with no mass. All of todays physics is based on using math to confirm beliefs that have no basis in reality and defy reason. Physicists spend a lot of time and money convincing themselves to believe in nonsense and are unable to accept that they have been made into fools. Their “expertise”, reputation, and income depend on perpetuating the fantasy reality they’ve created and math is the tool they use. They are quite willing to accept that as you get closer to a center of gravity and time expands the greater the distance to the enter of gravity.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Robert Beatty

      |

      Good points Herb,
      Unfortunately there is a lot we do not understand including ‘entangled’ particles, or as Einstein described them “spooky action at a distance”. Or how gravity works, whether that is via quantum mechanics or the theory of relativity, or something else entirely.
      However, we do know both these phenomena exist. All we can do is observe the evidence that is available to us and work out how that can be logically applied.
      My speculation at how that might be applied is at https://www.bosmin.com/PSL/GravityVectors.pdf
      I have included in Section 7 a suggestion for further research work which will help to answer the most pressing questions. These include: Check electron orbits for direction bias. Check for changing values for G, and identify causes. Review stabilising free neutrons with positrinos. Review Modified Model of Elementary Particles, and Review Negatron to Graviton methodology.
      Your thoughts on this always welcome.

      Reply

      • Avatar

        Herb Rose

        |

        Hi Robert,
        We have a basic disagreement (which isa good thing) in that I am of the opinion that the basic beliefs that we accept as physics are wrong and must be replaced (light is both a particle and a wave whose nature depends on the choice of the observer vs light is a wave whose speed varies with the medium (energy and mater fields). You believe that the existing beliefs can be kept and tweaked to remove discrepancies.
        The determination of the orbits of electrons by probability begins with glaring false assumption that there is no magnetic field present.Where does this occur? Certainly not in a sun where the atom is formed. Once an electron orbit a proton the proton becomes the reference point for the motion of the electron so while your diagrams may show a lattice for the path of the electron, the electrons in a circular orbit around the proton and the lattice structure is the result of movement of the atom unit from an eternal viewpoint. Once that circular orbit is established a magnetic field for the atom is created then reinforced as more electrons are added.
        The image you consider as proof of black holes is bogus. Light is created when electrons jump from one energy state to another creating a disturbance in the electric and magnetic fields. Subatomic particles can never be seen.
        As to the stabilization of neutrons, they are stable in the nucleus of atoms where their electrons are protected from attack by energy. If an electron is exposed on the nucleus it is displaced by energy creating beta decay (an impossibility with current theory) or if unprotected by a nucleus’s magnetic field, energy will split the neutron into a proton and an electron releasing energy as a gamma ray.
        The solution for solving the problems of physics is not in making more complicated by creating a never ending collection of subatomic particles and new “rules” (quantum physics) but by simplification. There are two things that make up the universe: matter and energy. These two components produce two forces: matter- positive and negative electric charges, energy gravity (nondirectional and magnetic (directional). Both energy and electrons are attracted to positive matter. The force of energy being a stronger force, is able to separate electrons from protons creating atoms where there are two electric fields (positive and negative) and where the separated negatice electric force creates a direction energy force (magnetism) from the radiate energy force (gravity) This is why even though the two force behave in similar fashion, they have opposite actions.
        Herb

        Reply

        • Avatar

          Robert Beatty

          |

          “I am of the opinion that the basic beliefs that we accept as physics are wrong”
          “The image you consider as proof of black holes is bogus.”
          “electric force creates a direction energy force (magnetism) from the radiate energy force (gravity) This is why even though the two force behave in similar fashion, they have opposite actions.”
          Herb, you are starting from a long way back with these types of statements, which to me are completely incomprehensible.

          Reply

          • Avatar

            Herb Rose

            |

            Our belief system that we call physics is an evolving thing that builds on acceptance of previous hypothesizes as being true. When one of these beliefs is shown to be false (like the 2nd law of thermodynamics) the subsequent hypothesizes built on this foundation are no longer valid and need to be re-assessed.
            When Newton developed his laws of gravity the idea of action a distance was not accepted (even though magnetism and its action at a distance were known) so he created G to provide a source (mass) for his force, even though the evidence (Kepler’s law dv^2 = C) did not provide a source. He accepted the existing belief of no action at a distance instead of creating a new concept, energy. You accept G but disagree that it is constant. I disagree that G is real and think that the wrong results (masses derived by using Newton’s formula) are clearly shown by new evidence (binary asteroids). Actions at a distance are real and it is the fields of radiated energy and electric forces that cause these actions. There is no distance between objects because the size of an object is determined by its fields, not its matter, and these fields expand until they meet the fields of neighboring objects.
            When two opposite magnetic field approach the size and strength of the radiated magnetic force increases creating a larger magnet. When two opposit charges approach the size and strength of the radiated electric force decrease creating a neutron. When similar magnetic poles are forced together the size and strength of the radiated magnetic force decreases. When similar electric charges are forced together the size and strength of the radiated electric field increases.This is observable contrary actions and yet people still accept that electromagnetism as being one force.
            The current nonsense called physics is the result of the continued acceptance of mistaken beliefs that date from the beginning of the science.and trying to progress by making modifications instead of accepting that our beliefs are wrong even as new evidence shows we are wrong.
            Herb.

          • Avatar

            T. C. Clark

            |

            It’s Herbphysics….just forgetaboutit Robert. No one knows what it is except Herb.

          • Avatar

            Robert Beatty

            |

            Thanks T.C. Clark
            The link to your name does not work for some reason.

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via