Directed Energy Weapons on 9/11
A Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) is a ranged weapon that damages its target with highly focused energy without a solid projectile.
DEWs can use a variety of energy sources including lasers, microwaves, particle beams and sound beams.
The concept has been around for centuries, but the technology has only recently become mature enough to be considered for military use. For example, the first DEWs were developed in the early 20th century, but they were not very powerful and had limited range.
What if Directed Energy Weapons were used to destroy the Twin Towers?
To be clear, the official story is bunk.
I am torn between the mini-nuke “controlled demolition” hypothesis and the DEW hypothesis presented by Judy Wood and Andrew Johnson (and others).
However, there are far too many anomalies that don’t fit into the mini-nuke argument.
Andrew’s slideshow is explosive.
He analyses what actually happened in relation to DEW and includes commentary on mind-bending physics surrounding the Hutchinson Effect and Nikola Tesla.
You’ll need to watch since it is a visual presentation.
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Herb Rose
| #
WOW! They have a directed energy weapon that looks like an airplane and can not only punch a hole in the side of a building but produce a fire that rages for an hour.
Another example of ignoring the evidence and accepting some outlandish excuse. It’s like the device that was found in an ancient ship wreck. It couldn’t have been made by the people of that era so it had to be a device produced by aliens or brought back in time that showed the Earth as the center of the solar system with the sun, moon, and five planets orbiting it.
Reply
typhus
| #
Airborne Lasers have been used in global multiweapon & sensor testing for several decades.
Once all possibilities have been eliminated….the obvious stands out.
Reply
Mario M
| #
Mini nuke is impossible because no nuke was ever produced. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were carped bombed.
Reply
Herb Rose
| #
Hi Mario,
What caused all the radiation injuries that showed up after the bombing? I don’t know of any type of bomb that creates an implosion instead of an explosion.
Herb
Reply
Mario M
| #
It is easy to change the cause of an illness, we have seen this with the Aids and Covid
Reply
Herb Rose
| #
This illness, with the skin dying and falling off, didn’t occur in London, Berlin, Dresden, Frankfort Tokyo, or any other city destroyed by bombing, only Hiroshima and Nagasaki. In any other of these bombed cities were the shadows of people burned into concrete? Why would the Japanese fake the results? I knew a girl in high school whose father flew into the mushroom cloud of during a nuclear test. He was the only crew member who survived for very long and was studied to see why he survived.
What evidence do you have to support your disbelief while millions (including Yoko Ono who survived Hiroshima) have accepted the evidence?
I would call you pig headed but pigs are fairly smart and I’d be insulting them.
Herb
Reply
typhus
| #
Speculation only in response to your apt quarsion.
The Fire Bombs may have been laced with radioactive materials.
Nothing is mentioned of Scalar Weapons…which were used on 9/11.
The dissociation of the iron based metal reveals what frequency they were tuned to. Yep, all of the freaky side effects of iron metal based things, such as vehicles nearby, explains by inference. But one would need to actually know about their existence in order to connect the dots of effects recorded that day.
Reply
typhus
| #
The DEW were a back up plan, they hoped not to use. It was ALSO a massive Firepower Demonstration to some other power…a Warning.
There was a controlled detonation to bring down the towers. At least one of the taller towers was not falling into its footprint.
The backup plan was engaged to prevent the tower from keeling over out of its footprint….from about 2 thirds of the way up its flank. The DEW prevented that occurrence.
Reply
typhus
| #
DUSTIFICATION should be a new term in “the science”.
Reply
Herb Rose
| #
Hi Typhus,
Radioactive material was quite rare back in the 40s. It took 2 years to separate the 6.4 kg of uranium 235 to make the bomb. The plutonium, made in a reactor, was faster allowing them to accumulate enough to make 2 bombs in 2 years. The radiation poisoning from the bombs were not from the fuel but caused by the neutrons from the explosion converting non radioactive atoms into radioactive isotopes.
Herb
Reply
Joseph Olson
| #
There was a 2.2 Richter scale explosion in the base of each Twin Tower, 12 seconds prior to the recorded 14 second free fall collapse. There was a 100 foot deep cavern melted into the granite bedrock under each Twin Tower. The debris was 2500°F hot until Dec 2001.
“Breathtaking: Solving Nuclear 9/11” at Veterans Today > three 90 min videos
“Unequivocal 9/11 Nukes” > “Exposing NIST Jenga Game” > VeteransToday.com
Reply
Herb Rose
| #
Hi Joseph,
If the base of the towers were blown in/out why did the collapse start in the upper stories above the fires and collapse down instead of the collapse beginning at the base?
I don’t see how you could have an underground nuclear explosion without the force moving upward instead of down.
Herb
Reply
Joseph Olson
| #
VeteransToday.com has 80 articles on “Nuclear Education”….why don’t you invest a WEEK in serious study of what you refuse to understand
Reply
Herb Rose
| #
A 3.0 Richter scale reading is produced from the energy of .5 tons of TNT explosion. Pretty small nuclear bombs.
Reply
T. C. Clark
| #
This should be introduced by Rod Serling and the Twilight Zone music.
Reply
typhus
| #
Esoteric weaponry was used on 9/11 to make sure the falling towers fell straight down into their footprint. One of the towers was in fact keeling over about 1/3 of the way up its flank. That was prevented by the dissociative beam.
Reply
T. C. Clark
| #
UFO, huh? Maybe the same UFO seen above the grassy knoll in Dallas when JFK shot?
Reply