Ferrari resists pressure to phase out combustion engines
Ferrari will continue to build cars with internal combustion engines into the late 2030s, despite efforts by governments around the world to phase out the technology
The boss of the Italian manufacturer said it would be “arrogant” to dictate to customers what they can buy.
For Ferrari, as for many other premium brands, the move towards electric cars presents a steep marketing challenge.
But the company is due to introduce its first electric supercar in 2025.
Traditionally, the raucous sound of an eight or 12-cylinder internal combustion engine has been a key part of its appeal. But battery-powered cars are much quieter.
Nevertheless, Ferrari is planning to launch its first fully electric model in two years’ time – a design the company insists will offer a “unique driving experience”.
This puts it at odds with rival brand McLaren, whose CEO told an FT automotive summit this week the technology was “not ready” for use in supercars, due to the weight of the batteries.
Last year, Ferrari unveiled plans for a three-pronged approach in developing new vehicles, as part of a commitment to becoming carbon neutral by 2030. It said electric cars and hybrids would make up an increasing proportion of its range by the end of the decade.
But it insisted it would continue to develop internal combustion engines as well, to build on what it called “an essential part of the company’s heritage”.
Until recently that strategy appeared to have a limited lifespan, with a number of major markets preparing to ban the sale of new cars with internal combustion engines by 2035.
In March, however, the European Union agreed to provide an exemption from its own ban for cars run exclusively on synthetic “e-fuels”, produced using renewable energy.
Such fuels are expected to be expensive, but the loophole means performance car makers will still be able to sell models with engines across one of the world’s biggest markets.
In a BBC interview, Ferarri boss Benedetto Vigna pointed to this decision as a sign that technology was evolving, and denied doing so would undermine the company’s environmental credentials.
“I don’t want to be arrogant and impose a choice on our client,” he said.
“It is the client who must choose if they want an ICE (internal combustion engine), a hybrid or an electric car.”
But in other markets, including the UK, no such loophole for e-fuels yet exists. That raises the possibility of some Ferrari models being available in the EU, but banned elsewhere.
“We have to cope with the rules of all the countries we operate in,” said Mr Vigna.
“The reason we have three kinds of propulsion – ICE, hybrid and electric – is that it allows us to cope with any regulation, all over the world.”
See more here bbc.co.uk
Header image: Reuters
Bold emphasis added
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Tom
| #
A company that gets it…saying it would be arrogant to dictate what consumers can buy…hear that you wokie government green turds?
Reply
Dave
| #
EVs, Unsafe at any speed.
Reply
Richard
| #
I wouldn’t spend £200,000 on a Ferrari with a hairdryer for an engine .
Reply
Kevin Doyle
| #
An engineer working for Ferrari can explain in detail the physical and thermodynamic workings of a gasoline engine.
There is no ‘climate scientist’ today who can explain how cold CO2 in the atmosphere warms the surface of land nor sea. Nor, can they demonstrate this ‘Theory’ in a laboratory.
Meanwhile, the engineer from Ferrari can demonstrate his knowledge every day with repeatable, scientific, unquestionable, empirical evidence.
This ‘CO2 Greenhouse Gas Theory’, started in the 1990’s, will be recorded in history as the greatest pseudo-scientific hoax ever perpetrated upon humanity and beasts…
Reply
Herb Rose
| #
Hi Kevin,
Actually the GHGT was started in the 1870s by Savannti Arrheneus to explain why the Earth was warming since the end of the little ice age. It was debunked by Knut Angstrom and withdrawn in the 1890s. The current resurrection was done by a Tennessee snake oil salesman as a con where an imaginary crisis was created so he could steal a lot of money
Herb
Reply
Moffin
| #
Hello Herb. The current resurrection was actually carried out by Margaret Thatcher to convince the populace to accept nuclear power to circumvent the coal miners strikes that were crippling UK industry. Scargill was the name of the union leader.
I emailed Jerry and received no reply. Thank you, Jerry Krause, for that which you taught me.
Reply