COVID Public Inquiry

Written by Joel Smalley on May 16, 2023. Posted in Current News

We have to be honest – we are not going to win this war. The media propaganda is too strong and the public is too feeble-minded

However, unlike other wars, the history of this one will not be written by the victors.

Future historians will have a trove of evidence that will easily contradict the dogmatic assertions of those on the side of the official narrative.

One of those troves will be the Public Inquiry.

Again, I have very little confidence that the conclusion will be honest and evidence-based but at least the evidence will be recorded for those who aren’t tainted by the globalist funding or suckered by their “trusted” government agencies.

In a similar vein, those who honestly chronicle the evidence today will be remembered favourably, and deservedly so too given the amount of illegitimate abuse they have had to endure.

One such chronicler is my dear friend, Dr Clare Craig – Co-Chair HART group. Diagnostic pathologist, lover of data, digital pathology and AI – according to her Twitter profile. I have seen her 175-page witness statement for the Public Inquiry, supported by almost 700 references. It is this sort of effort that makes such evidence credible.

Here is a very small excerpt, tweeted by her today (N.B. the use of 💉 instead of “vaccine” because illegitimate censorship of counter-narrative evidence is still happening in mainstream media).

I have been very busy recently preparing a witness statement for the covid Public Inquiry.

They asked me to share details of deaths in 15-19 year olds males associated with 💉 rollout so I had to explain the bigger picture regarding concerns with these 💉. I said this:

Feb 2020 Whitty1 said:

Covid not deadly enough to fast-track vaccines, Chris Whitty advised ministers

Chief Medical Officer gave opinion in February 2020 after Dominic Cummings mentioned Israel was planning to inoculate population.

“The rate limiting steps are late clinical trials for safety & efficacy, & then manufacturing.

For a disease with a low (for the sake of argument one percent) mortality, a vaccine has to be very safe so the safety studies can’t be shortcut. So important for the long run.”

The belief that vaccines were safe had led to a circular belief that vaccines required fewer safety checks than other novel therapies.

Novel vaccines take a decade or more to go through saefety checks. Flu vaccines don’t. These novel drugs were treated like flu vaccines for regulatory purposes.

Pharma skipped testing for genotoxicity, carcinotoxicity and even studies showing how much spike is produced, for how long and where in the body it reaches. They said these studies were “not considered necessary.”

The trial info sheet said:

“Due to the urgent need for a vaccine against Covid-19, with agreement from the MHRA, some of the tests usually required for a newly manufactured vaccine have been modified, in order to make the vaccine available more quickly for assessment.”

The regulators let the pharma companies get away with trashing the placebo group after ~2 months by giving them the novel products.

This was despite us knowing that narcolepsy caused by Pandemrix vaccine took on avg 8 months to be diagnosed.

Norwegian study links flu vaccine to narcolepsy risk

The Norwegian Institute of Public Health has found an elevated risk of narcolepsy among children and young adults who were vaccinated against the swine flu seven years ago. Some who did not take the vaccine against the pandemic of 2009 also developed this severe sleeping disorder.

AZ issued a press release claiming 100 percent efficacy against hospitalisation and death after only two severe covid hospitalisations and one death in the placebo arm.

This claim was repeated widely and was believed.

The priority was to protect the old and vulnerable who accounted for 98 percent of covid deaths. There were going to be 15 million jabs to freedom.

However, the WHO started a campaign in August 2020 that “no-one is safe until everyone is safe.” This penetrated and 💉 started to be aimed at healthy and ever younger arms.

The manufacturers decided to use the WHOLE Chinese spike sequence rather than parts of it, or peptides, which have been shown to be safer for vaccine design.

Some manufacturers modified the spike so that it could not bind to the receptor and enter a cell. This might have reduced some harm but the spike was delivered into cells – spike was produced INSIDE the cells in the first place.

AZ did not modify the sequence. From Nov 2020 it was clear that parts of AZ spike could be shed outside of cells.

There was total regulatory failure in allowing these products to be given to anyone which was compounded by not withdrawing them promptly once evidence these issues were clinically relevant became clear.

The huge numbers of failings has been set out by Perseus Group in The Perseus Report.

To touch on a few points: Since 2005 there were concerns about the regulator

“losing sight of the need to protect and promote public health.”

The CEO claims the MHRA is now an “enabler” not a “watchdog.”

No human studies were carried out to see what happened to the synthetic modified RNA – no-one knows how long it takes to be removed from the body. There is evidence that in some it lasts between at least 28 days and 4 months in the blood.

The lipid nanoparticles that devlivers the modified synthetic mRNA is toxic. This mechanism was shelved in 2016 for conventional gene therapy because of the multiple doses needed.

It was claimed it could still be used in vaccine technology because that only requires one dose… The viral vector used for delivering the AstraZeneca DNA message was reported in 2007 to cause platelet activation, which can lead to blood clots.

The Pfizer and Moderna clinical trial data shows a higher rate of serious adverse reactions from vaccine (12.5 per 10,000) than any reduction in serious events from covid (2.3 and 6.4 per 10,000 for Pfizer and Moderna respectively).

The adverse reaction alarm system blared red from January 2021. It was claimed this was due to over reporting because more people were informed about the system. Over the same time period reports for other drugs did not rise.

The US VAERS reporting system has been forced to release its data which shows signals of harm for 770 conditions, 2/3 of which were a stronger signal than for myocarditis & pericarditis which were acknowledged as a genuine adverse event in mid 2021.

This is taken from a long document with a lot more images. Read the rest here substack.com

Header image: gov.uk

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About Covid 19

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.