This Australian Climate Bill must not pass
Senator Malcolm Roberts (pictured) calls on the Senate to reject the Climate Change Bills 2022 due to the complete lack of cost-benefit analysis.
He says:
“Carbon dioxide emissions reduction is the biggest change to Australian lives Parliament has ever considered.
Despite the target’s huge impact, absolutely nothing in the Climate Change Bill says how it will be achieved, what the cost to Australia will be or what measurable impact reducing Australia’s carbon dioxide production will have on global temperature.
Politicians don’t accept this kind of blank cheque and ignorant attitude to the flow-on effects of legislation in any other policy, and shouldn’t on energy.”
Emissions reduction policies are expected to significantly impact energy, transport and agriculture.
“Grids that have tried to rely on wind and solar to provide their needs have either been left in the dark or have skyrocketing energy prices.
Instead of learning from international wind and solar disasters like Texas and Germany, Australian climate alarmists want us to follow their road to ruin.
Adding emissions reduction to the National Energy Objectives will compromise the existing objectives of price, quality, safety, reliability and security of supply of energy.
A government funded study has already sounded the alarm on the forced and premature uptake of electric vehicles, finding that uptake could increase electricity demand by 30-100 percent on Australia’s already struggling power grid.
Under an emissions target, taxpayer money will be spent telling farmers to lockup their land for carbon dioxide credits, essentially a scam plagued with integrity issues and currently under government review.
Australia’s farmers can grow enough to feed and clothe the world, yet won’t be able to under this target.”
Senator Roberts’ submission to the Climate Change Bills inquiry outlines the lack of due diligence and ideological, rather than evidence based, attitudes that have driven climate policy.
“Not a single politician can say what specific measurable impact these emissions reduction policies will have on any aspect of climate or weather.
Until the true, full costs of an emissions target are given to Australia, this Bill must not pass.”
See more here: malcolmrobertsqld
Bold emphasis added
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Chris*
| #
Thank you Malcolm, you have stood tall against the shrills and the scammers. We are now watching the death throes of Britain and Germany which was foreseeable, and our government wants to copy their failure.
Exactly who are they governing for – because it is not us ?
Reply
Charles Higley
| #
Just a few years ago, an engineer figured out that, if every EV owner in New York City plugged in to recharge at the same time, they could crash the city and local area grid. It is ironic that Germany is turning off charging stations for lack of electricity.
So, they want everybody to go EV, but they also know it cannot work. This is a purposeful sabotaging of their economy and society.
Reply
monkey*poops
| #
who said that EV will replace the normal cars? they said that normal cars will “phase out”. that doesn’t mean we all going to have EV.
according to the WEF (say whatever, those cu*ts are behind everything that is happening now and will happen in the future) we will reduce the cars as such. no more family cars. elites will have cars and some of the chosen servants will have a car, the rest will walk and ride a bus.
Reply
ColA
| #
Malcolm is a voice crying in the wilderness.
He asks the 2 critical questions;
1) HOW WILL YOU DO IT?
and
2) HOW MUCH WILL IT COST?
Years ago no one would NEVER look at major policy change without clear answers to those 2 questions, now we are called heretics because they can’t answer!
Reply