Pentagon Clarifies, No ‘Offensive’ Biologic Weapons in Ukraine Bio-Labs

Written by theconservativetreehouse.com on . Posted in Current News

Every time the U.S. government attempts to clarify the biolabs in Ukraine, they end up making things less clear.

In the most recent example, Deborah Rosenbaum (pictured), the assistant secretary of defense for nuclear, chemical, and biological defense programs, told the House subcommittee on Intelligence and Special Operations on Friday that “I can say to you unequivocally there are no offensive biologic weapons in the Ukraine laboratories that the United States has been involved with.”

In a fact sheet produced March 11, 2022, the U.S. Defense Department admitted to working with biological weapons facilities in Ukraine [LINK]. “The United States … has invested approximately $200 million in Ukraine since 2005, supporting 46 Ukrainian laboratories, health facilities, and diagnostic sites.”

As the current story is told the U.S. government was coordinating with the Ukraine government on biologic research facilities, many of which were left over from the former Soviet era.  In/around the time the Russian invasion was feared, they worked quickly to destroy the pathogens, because they were worried what might happen if the Russians took control of the facilities.

This begs the obvious first question, if the U.S. Defense Department was working with Ukraine since 2005, and they could destroy the deadly pathogens in a few days before the conflict, why didn’t the Pentagon destroy them in the preceding 16 years?

The second question targets the issues that are more opaque.  The DoD says the U.S. has not been involved in “offensive biological weapon” creation in Ukraine.  Technically, all of the weapons in the U.S. military are classified as “defensive” weapons, ergo the Department of Defense.  Every weapon is defensive until it is used.

Then, depending on the circumstances, the use of the weapon changes its classification to offensive.  Why would biological weapons be any different?

By the current standard of Defense Department definitions, all of the biological weapons they might be working with Ukraine to develop would technically be classified defensive weapons.

As a result, saying “there are no offensive biologic weapons” is a rather moot and irrelevant point.

Three points:

♦ Point One – Russia and the U.S. Pentagon both agree the U.S. government was working in Ukraine in biological weapons labs.

♦ Point Two – Both Russia and the U.S. admit these were/are deadly biological pathogens.

♦ Point Three – The biggest difference between the two positions is that Russia says these were offensive weapons, and the U.S/Ukraine saying these were defensive weapons.

The debate is not about whether the U.S. Defense Department was operating and funding biological weapons laboratories in Ukraine.  The U.S. government has now made that admission.  The debate is now about the purpose or intent of those weapons.

If Russia was investing in biological weapons labs in Mexico, and if the Russian military was working inside those labs along with Mexican government officials, I suspect the United States would conduct a special military operation in Mexico to remove that threat.

See more here: theconservativetreehouse.com

Bold emphasis added

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Share via

Trackback from your site.

Comments (8)

  • Avatar

    Joseph Olson

    |

    US Department of WAR, founded Aug 07, 1789 rebranded itself as the Dept of Defense on Sept 18, 1947. All of our Acts of War are benevolent, on behalf of our banking oligarchs. Our bioweapons are peaceful, gentle weapons.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Mark Tapley

      |

      Hi Olson:
      Your bioweapons are in the same category as your unequivocal (fake) nukes. You seem to have forgotten all of those bioweapons and WMD’s Saddam had. The fake Ukrainian war is run by the same Zionists just happening to need something to divert the goyim’s attention from the fake vaccine carnage.

      Reply

  • Avatar

    richard

    |

    now here would be a surprise- Pentagon admits to biological weapons.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Pierre-D Bernier

    |

    No-Offensive means they admit to defensive. So they admit they have !

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Mark Tapley

    |

    Hello Bernier:
    More fake stories from the fake war in Ukraine. This according to (((Rosenbaum))). Where is Victoria (((Nuland))) and her Neo NAZI crisis actors. Kind of like when Assad was gassing his own people and Saddam had all of those mobile bio labs and WMD’s. Its like Reagans CIA director stated:
    “We will know that we have succeeded when everything the public believes is false”–William Casey, Former CIA Director
    And here’s another one:
    https://quotefancy.com/quote/1669465/William-Colby-The-Central-Intelligence-Agency-owns-everyone-of-any-significance-in-the major media.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Purebloodpatriot

    |

    Anyone claiming that ivermectin does not work against covid and flu like symptoms are either working for big pharma or doesn’t know what he/she is talking about. It has been proven by so many scientists in universities that IVM works curing and preventing what is so called covid19 aka flu. I see people sometimes saying that they overcomed covid in 2-3 days with natural remedies and don’t need any drug. While they are right about using natural remedies and healthy living style, we have elderly and immune deficient loved ones in our circle. That is when this drug accelerates the recovery process. I recommend everyone to get it because these big pharma shills have undertaken as a duty to kill us http://www.livingnatural.net

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via