So You Took The Jab—Ever Wonder What Else Is In That Shot?
They are now coming out with the announcement that they want to continue with, yes, nano-chips in medicines. In this case tablets. Of course, we already found out that nanochips with a tracking device are in those Covid shots. So what else is in them?
Background: This is a maneuver by the WEF/pharma cartel being able to say that they are having an open hand in this.
And to avoid further suspicion, they are not presenting the tracking nano-device in one shot. No, they now put it in a PILL (But won’t that chip come out with your stool?). Then the sheep probably won’t get it!
They will probably be right about this. You can really fool those vaccinated sheep into anything. Very sorry everyone. Why the WEF involvement anyway?
Surely this is not an economic matter but something for the EU/UN/WHO? Why was there never a chip in medication in the past to relieve healthcare staff?
In addition to nano-bots, they’re also putting other junk in those Covid shots: highly toxic graphene, parasites, and other living creatures.
This pharma club is really unafraid of anything.
Trackback from your site.
itsme
| #
this one is good – i noticed the ‘shedding’ ( around the 12-13 minute mark) also future plans
ATTORNEY REINER FUELLMICH AND ATTORNEY TODD CALLENDER
https://www.bitchute.com/video/dkSp8bxDxqK6/
Reply
QorpsE
| #
Reiner Fuellmich failed.
And “shedding” is false, btw. You have to be REAL bad at physics to believe that shit. You might want to consider EM, proximity, circumstance.
Reply
XTBD
| #
Depends on what you consider shedding. Shedding as in the vax? Yes, this is in Pfizers own documentation and has been around since about 2012 in theory.
Shedding of electronics? Yeah, that one I am with you on.
Reply
QorpsE
| #
“Shedding as in the vax? Yes, this is in Pfizers own documentation and has been around since about 2012 in theory.”
That’s called a ruse. Projection to perpetuate the fundamental fraud they rely on.
Imagine for instance that you rely on the belief of contagion and that sort of fraud to peddle your worthless toxic garbage…you might for instance, “prime” people with documentation. Psychological manipulation.
If you want me to explain why shedding is in actual physical terms, irrelevant, I can do that.
Reply
QorpsE
| #
“You might want to consider EM, proximity, circumstance.”
With that, I meant, what people are suggesting vax shedding is, is related to their ignorance of EM tracking, targeting and circumstance (such as being in toxic environments such as hospitals, using medications, etc), so they might assume that because there were vaccinated people, the vaccinated “shed” and made them sick, because they are not considering enormous amounts of circumstantial factors.
Reply
Reese
| #
Madej is apparently proven controlled opposition so why is she being featured?
Reply