What if the COVID-19 vaccines are not really vaccines?
Evidence has come to light strongly indicating that the Moderna and Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines are not really “vaccines” in the medical and legal sense of the word, but rather “experimental gene therapies.”
If proven true, the significance and legal ramifications of this allegation are profound.
This article summarizes a presentation by Dr. David Martin, a national intelligence analyst and founder of IQ100 Index, a developer of linguistic genomics, and molecular biologist Dr. Judy Mikovits.
In the presentation, Dr. Martin states, “You cannot have a vaccine that doesn’t claim to result in either immunity or blocking transmission.” He goes on to say, “By their own patents and reference material, neither Pfizer nor Moderna claims this. Rather, they only classify their products as ‘gene therapy.'”
Dr. Martin states the Moderna and Pfizer products:
“do not prevent you from getting the COVID-19 infection, nor do they prevent its spread. They are really experimental gene therapies — unlike real vaccines, which use an antigen of the disease you’re trying to prevent, the Moderna and Pfizer injections contain synthetic RNA fragments encapsulated in a nanolipid carrier compound, the sole purpose of which is to lessen clinical symptoms associated with the S-1 spike protein, not the actual virus.”
If indeed Moderna and Pfizer corporations are misrepresenting their experimental gene therapies as bona fide vaccines, Dr. Martin states that:
“the legal ramifications of this deception are immense — from a legal view, both Moderna and Pfizer qualify as using illegal deceptive practices by making medical claims without clinic trial proof of immunity and transmission blocking. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S. Code, Section 41, outlaws such deceptive practices.”
During the presentation, various entities and individuals were identified as supporters of the above alleged deception, including the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, a professor of microbiology and immunology at the University of North Carolina, and other individuals.
Why call an experimental gene therapy product a “vaccine”? Dr. Martin believes that there are two basic reasons:
1) to circumvent liability for damages, and
2) if the products were called gene therapy or a similar label, most people would wisely refuse to use them.
Regarding avoiding liability for damages, as long as the U.S. is under a state of emergency, things like COVID-19 “vaccines” are allowed under emergency use authorization. As long as the emergency use authorization is in effect, the makers of these “vaccines” are not financially liable for any damages that comes from their use.
However, Dr Martin states that:
“there is no liability shield for a medical emergency countermeasure that is gene therapy.”
In fact, if the documentation Pfizer and Moderna provided the Federal Drug Administration for emergency use authorization can be proven fraudulent, then there is no legal protection.
Given the above, a multitude of multi-million-dollar lawsuits are possible, if not probable, against the two pharmaceutical companies by parties who have been “injured” in one way or another by Moderna and Pfizer inoculations. Depending on the evidence produced, criminal indictments may also be a possibility.
What needs to happen next? Dr. Martin urges citizens to contact their state attorney, governor, representatives, and anyone else who might be in a position to take action to address and correct what he calls a tremendous fraud on the American people. He hopes his presentation will be viewed and acted upon by officials with the authority to thoroughly investigate his findings.
He states:
“Defense contractors are violating FTC law, and gene therapy companies — not vaccine manufacturers — are conducting experimental trials under deceptive medical practices. They’re making claims of being ‘vaccines’ without clinical proof, and must be held accountable for their deceptive marketing and medical practices.”
The need for accountability extends to anyone who promoted the use of the Moderna and Pfizer products while having full knowledge that they were not bona fide vaccines as described herein.
Dr. Martin states:
“World governments and global and national health organizations are all complicit in this illegal deception and must be held accountable.”
In conclusion, Dr. Martin makes a most sobering comment:
“These injections are not vaccines. They do not prevent infection, they do not render you immune, and they do not prevent transmission of the disease. Instead, they alter your genetic coding.”
Given the above, perhaps it is time for several state attorneys general to band together and thoroughly investigate the activities of Moderna, Pfizer, and various individuals in this matter. This could develop into a similar cooperative multi-state effort reminiscent of the 1998 Big Tobacco lawsuit.
In this action, 52 state and territory attorneys general ultimately signed a Master Settlement Agreement with the four largest tobacco companies in the U.S. to settle dozens of state lawsuits brought to recover billions of dollars in health care costs associated with treating smoking-related illnesses.
See more here: americanthinker.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Terry Shipman
| #
Those of us who follow PSI regularly already knew these jabs weren’t legally vaccines. That is one reason I have consistently declined the jab. I did my due diligence and found out about the history of mRNA “vaccine” attempts. I believe that in the end PSI will be vindicated and will rightly be able to say, “We told you so.”
Reply
Emily
| #
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> https://www.worksful.com
Reply
Tom
| #
They are not vaccines, or even close. Come on, get your head in the game. The mRNA poisin injections do not fit any standard definition of a vaccine.
Reply
Charles Higley
| #
It’s clear these jabs are gene therapy and not vaccines. But, the question should be asked as to why they chose the most toxic of known coronavirus proteins, made it stiffer and even more toxic, and then built gene therapy based on the weaponized spike protein?
Clearly, the goal was not to improve one’s health. Rather, the goal is to damage and alter one’s genes and future health, either immediately or over time and through multiple applications of gene therapy. The health issues already apparent are only going to become more numerous over time.
Meanwhile, the evil ones are going to pretend that the upsurge of health issues and deaths are from other causes and NEVER suggest that these conditions and deaths were from the jabs.
For example, chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is caused by a person having a specific gene mutation and being infected by a specific virus, which is in 6 to 8% of the population and then a physiological insult from a vaccine. This is a huge secret that they do not want the public to know of because the virus was man-created in the process of developing a polio vaccines years ago. So, now, they are going to hide CFS under the cover of Covid-19, by claiming that Covid-19 causes “Long Covid” and CFS will disappear as a diagnosis. Renaming a condition is not new strategy in medicine.
Reply
Squidly
| #
Well, when the inventor of mRNA says it’s not a vaccine, it’s probably not a vaccine.
Reply
Mark Tapley
| #
It is clear that the fake virus blood toxin injection is not a vaccine. I believe that it is not a gene therapy either as claimed. First we know that there is no virus because none of any type has ever been isolated, purified nor identified. Never has any verified virus been extracted from any human or animal. Therefore since no viruses exist, then there are no variants. The microscopy photos used by the CDC are no different from the original pictures use by Enders in his contaminated tissue samples in 1953, nor the faulty samples also used today by fake virology to show evidence of viruses and spike proteins. Recently, Microbiologist Stephan Lanka duplicated the same tissue sample procedure making sure there was no exosome material (cellular debris and broken proteins) and came up with the exact same result. Virology is a phony science.
The argument about wether or not the fake virus injection is a “vaccine” or not is just more subterfuge to confuse the public with a bunch of technical jargon. Only two things are known for sure. First there is no virus and second the parasitic elite eugenicists are injuring and killing huge numbers of people with another fake vaccine blood toxin. So called “vaccines” have never worked as is documented in Suzanne Humphries MD book “Dissolving Illusions” which uses public records to show the real history of “vaccination.” Stephan Lanka has stated that the spike protein research has never been successful. He also has a reward of 1.5 million euros for anyone who can prove to the German Supreme Court the EXISTENCE OF ANY VIRUS. The objective of the insiders who have made hundreds of billions in taxpayers money on this fake virus medical control scam is to tie everything up in legal arguments that will never go any where. The real goal that needs to be set before us is to put the government in its proper constitutional role of securing the borders, protecting property rights and enforcing contracts. And nothing else. If that were the case, not only would the free market provide prosperity for all who were willing to work but the fake viruses and contrived conflicts would also disappear.
Reply