The Science of Conspiracy Theorization
The Establishment rolled out a campaign in 1967 to dissuade critical thinking and skepticism of government. The CIA created the term ‘conspiracy theory’ in the wake of the Warren Commission report, which large swaths of the U.S. public disbelieved.
But can a society survive that has abandoned pattern-recognition and critical thought?
A scientific approach is to recognise that those of us who identify and call out conspiracies are generally most adapt at pattern recognition; more attuned to connecting the dots. The precise dictionary definition of ‘conspiracy’ is contained in the screenshot graphic at the top of this article.
The largest group of professional conspiracy theorists are the police and criminal prosecutors who, daily, are identifying, investigating then prosecuting those who conspire to commit crimes. The rest of us are amateurs by comparison.
For the police and criminal prosecutors the task is to apply the legal definition, such as set out in a respected online legal dictionary, which states that:
“Conspiracy is a crime separate from the criminal act for which it is developed. For example, one who conspires with another to commit Burglary and in fact commits the burglary can be charged with both conspiracy to commit burglary and burglary. Conspiracy is an inchoate, or preparatory, crime.” [1]
The same legal dictionary then list a few cases in modern history where criminal conspiracies have been proven. At the time of writing, we still await criminal prosecutions of many grave crimes of international and historic significance such as the assassination of JFK, 9/11, the global banking fraud, man-made global warming, the COVID pandemic and associated ‘vaccine’ genocide.
A good introduction to the issue of conspiracy theorization is this video from New American Video.
https://youtu.be/BUgGEXQHkks
Good science is about pattern replication. Indeed, replication of a pattern is what scientists seek to discern in nature from which they can adduce repeatable behaviors. In the book, the Cybernetic Brain by Andrew Pickering, he says the very first thing scientist did when creating artificial intelligence (AI) in computers was to program in pattern recognition because it is one of the foundational pillars of intelligence.
However, the public is told the opposite. We are advised by the ‘powers that be’ that seeing the world as a random place is true intelligence and that the Universe is haphazard.
But in science if we can say something can be replicated (in pattern) we say it has been proven. If you discern a pattern over and over again, odds are, you are not wrong in surmising that what you are seeing is not spontaneous, but cunningly crafted constructs designed to keep you in a state of servitude to a force of psychopaths bent on ruling from behind the curtain.
The reason ancient humans were able to create a calendar was because they observed the change in seasons and saw a pattern. They built devices to measure and confirm such patterns and grew the ability to predict change, unlike other species.
From Stonehenge to sun dials and on to computers, pattern recognition is the key to discerning what lays behind otherwise random and complex behaviors, be it observing the natural world or discerning malevolent behavior by others.
[1] https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/conspiracy
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Mark Tapley
| #
From the contrived wars of the Hegelian dialectic, phony climate change from The Club of Rome, fake viruses from the Rockefeller founded CDC, 911 type events, fake riots, fake Floyd race baiting, banking cartel debt monetization for their insider buddies at Black Rock, there is an easy to trace sequence of events. These contrived contingencies lead to the final goal envisioned by the Zionist operative Karl Marx (Moses Mordecai Levy) in his ten point plank now repackaged as The Sustainable Development Initiative, Agenda 2030-21.
Now with the decades long coordinated implementation of the fake virus by all the countries of any consequence, even PSI readers should be able to follow the clearly visible path descending into a dystopian nightmare of permanent destitution and despair for all but those in the Zionist clique of total control. The following books will shed more light: Docherty’s “Hidden History, The Secret Origins of The First World War” and although written in the 1950’s (not published until the 70’s) by Britains foremost WW2 journalist Douglas Reed “The controversy of Zion” is still a good introduction to the conspiracy that now controls the puppet politicians with their fake events, academia, medicine, all MSM, “entertainment” the corporate world and governments.
Reply
Carlitos way
| #
It’s all spelled out in the 24 Protocols of Zion. The blueprint for hell on earth.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi John,
You wrote: “The largest group of professional conspiracy theorists are the police and criminal prosecutors who, daily, are identifying, investigating then prosecuting those who conspire to commit crimes. The rest of us are amateurs by comparison.” What is clearly false in your statement is “then prosecuting those who conspire to commit crimes.”
NO!!! The clear efforts of many law enforcement personnel and members the judicial system is to only to prosecute those WHO HAVE COMMITTED CRIMES which have been clearly defined. Yes, mistakes are known to have happened and mistakes, which cannot be undone, have been corrected as much as possible after the fact of the mistake has been acknowledged.
Your statement defames every member of the law enforcement and the judicial community who, by your statement, attempt to do a thankless job.
Have a good day, Jerry
Reply
Howdy
| #
Can’t speak for your neck of the woods Jerry, but in these parts, the cops appear to be rottweilers, nannies, or self-serving, dependent on who you are, or what you represent. No respect for an organization that is working beyond it’s own reason to exist.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Howdy,
Not sure what your neck of the woods are and what your age might be. It seems you are suggesting that anarchy is your solution.
A question I put to you: Have you ever put your employment on the line by doing what you consider is right??? I gave a student a D for the semester because that is the grade she earned. I was accused of racial discrimination and sexual discrimination in US Federal District Court and when the Federal Judge threw this out, but his decision was appealed to the US Circuit Court of Appeals where it was again thrown out. But this factor could have been a reason my administration tried to dismiss me. Because this administration seemed not to care if students learned anything; the only thing that the administration wanted, at this time, was HAPPY students.
Law enforcement officers put their lives at risk many times because they never know when they will encounter someone with your attitude.
Have a good day, Jerry
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Howdy,
Not sure what your neck of the woods are and what your age might be. It seems you are suggesting that anarchy is your solution.
A question I put to you: Have you ever put your employment on the line by doing what you consider is right??? I gave a student a D for the semester because that is the grade she earned. I was accused of racial discrimination and sexual discrimination in US Federal District Court and when the Federal Judge threw this out, but his decision was appealed to the US Circuit Court of Appeals where it was again thrown out. But this factor could have been a reason my administration tried to dismiss me. Because this administration seemed not to care if students learned anything; the only thing that the administration wanted, at this time, was HAPPY students.
Law enforcement officers put their lives at risk many times because they never know when they will encounter someone with your attitude.
Have a good day, Jerry
Reply
Howdy
| #
I guess your police officers still respect the meaning of, “to serve and protect”. In the UK, anarchy allready rules. Only common decency of people holds it together despite the klaus-slob brigade wanting civil war.The wrong-think officers/above-the-law- officers/social workers/innocent-bystander-tormentors, are all that remain.
Picking an 80 year old lady up and carrying her spread eagle to a police van because she disagreed. You think that sort of action is worthy of any respect?
“they never know when they will encounter someone with your attitude”
Come off it! Am I a rioter or something because my own county’s officers couldn’t care less and I talk about It.
Not my job, but I have put other things on the line, yes.
Reply
jerry Krause
| #
Hi Howdy,
I believe we can agree that ThINGS are terrible!!! It is very hard to know who or what to believe.
I thought about referring to the anarchy which exists in Portland and Salem OR of which I am familiar. But I didn’t because problem is the what’s at the top more than what’s on our streets. But in the USA I am wanting for the big poll in November, if we make it until then.
I have faith that the general population have seen how bad things are and there is no doubt who has been in control at the top.
We, you and I, at times agree and at times seem to disagree. Right now it seems to me we are agreeing except I am certain that anarchy is not the solution.
I have asked for help to stop my double posting which I seem to have no control over. But no one has offered a possible solution to this problem.
Have a good day, Jerry
Squidly
| #
Hi Jerry,
Seems you are subscribing to the fallacy that we can vote our way out of this mess. I can only say, good luck with that!
Howdy
| #
Hi Jerry,
“I have faith that the general population have seen how bad things are and there is no doubt who has been in control at the top.”
I don’t think they have seen enough. In order to know the depth of depravity. evil, and lack of regard for life, one has to be subject to It, or at least witness It first hand, otherwise the effect is fleeting and soon forgotten. I believe more time is required.
“We, you and I, at times agree and at times seem to disagree. Right now it seems to me we are agreeing except I am certain that anarchy is not the solution.”
We bump heads a lot, yet still discuss. Sounds like we do things the ‘old fashioned’ way. That’s what discussion is about IMO.
Anarchy is possibly not the true solution, but sometimes, the one people will most remember, particularly if taking part.
Court cases to provide a remedy have many escape routes and clauses, thus, they engender little trust, yet, were the judgements of sufficient ‘voracity’, It could kill two birds with one stone.
“I have asked for help to stop my double posting which I seem to have no control over. But no one has offered a possible solution to this problem.”
I presume It occurs only on PSI? Do your replies take time to be posted? In such case, are you perhaps clicking twice?
My problem is replies to posts sometimes end up as stand-alone replies.
Reply
Mark Tapley
| #
Hello Jerry, This is mainly a response to your post below. You (and me) have been around long enough so that you should know that the political process at the top is all planned out way in advance and Both the fake Republicans and fake Democrats are both controlled by the Zionist syndicate. You are just watching a staged event like the fake riots in Seattle and the totally asinine fake “capitol riot.”
The syndicate is now in the process of flipping the fake parties back over to the fake right wing after flipping it over to the fake left wing. This is so all the goyim can run out and vote, then hop up and down exclaiming “well we threw all those scoundrels out of powered now things will change.” They won’t. The Zionist program for the long planned Agenda 2030-21 will move on just as before. It will just have a right wing slant instead of a left wing slant. Zionist puppet Bill Clinton’s history professor CarrollQuigley summed it up a long time ago:
“The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies… is a foolish idea. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can throw the rascals out at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy. Then it should be possible to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party which will be none of these things but will still pursue, with new vigor, approximately the same basic policies.”
― Carroll Quigley
Reply
John O'Sullivan
| #
Jerry, The nuance is lost on you. The legal doctrine of ‘Innocent until proven guilty’ invalidates your simplistic claim that police/prosecutors pursue those who HAVE (instead, try: ‘maybe’) committed crime. Those ACCUSED can only HAVE committed a crime once found guilty upon trial. The police/prosecutor must first examine and weigh evidence and then compose a theory about an ALLEGED crime which they then put before a jury to determine. If you brazenly call ‘criminal’ on persons merely ACCUSED before the outcome of their trial, and they then are acquitted, you render yourself liable to a defamation lawsuit. Look up ‘Kyle Rittenhouse files defamation claims’ and understand.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi John,
The issue is with your word conspire: ‘make secret plans jointly to commit an unlawful or harmful act. (Oxford dictionary). The US legal system (enforcement and judicial), with which I am familiar, know they cannot prosecute (bring to trial) any one until a unlawful act has been committed. Once an unlawful act has been committed, the legal system must gather clear evidence as to whom committed the unlawful act that is being investigated by them. Without clear evidence our legal system does not try to go to trial because it is a waste of their resources. I have been grand jury juror to decide if the prosecutor had enough reasonable evidence to go to trial to protect the possible innocent.
So I do not accept any nuance has been lost on me. The problem is the word CONSPIRE which you used.
Have a good day, Jerry
Reply
Mark Tapley
| #
O’Sullivan you are correct. Everyone under what is supposed to be the U.S. Constitution has the presumption of innocence. The Rittenhouse circus however is not a good example because its is another fake trial, like many, going all the way back to the fake Manson trial. Real trials are not televised. The intention of this court scam is to do away with the presumption of innocence as well as to pump more money and power into law enforcement, especially at the federal level and remove what remains of the states 10th Amendment rights against federal intrusion. Here is information on the Rittenhouse fake. Begins on page 3:
http://mileswmathis.com/genup.pdf
I also include the Sharon Tate fake:
http://mileswmathis.com/tate.pdf
Reply
striketheroot
| #
Bullseye! Add the Jan 6th show trials, now ongoing.. But no one in the media seems to be aware of or interested in the rules governing REAL criminal trials.
Reply
Mark Tapley
| #
Hello Striketheroot: We could add tons of psy ops to the non stop list. It’s as puppet (brought to Cal. by Chicago mob) Reagan’s CIA director stated: “We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.” What surprises me is that the big majority of goyim never learn. The Capital “riot” was so ridiculous it showed how sloppy the Zionists have become and yet it still works. Fake Floyd (I can’t breathe) was another in a long line of race baiting. Now we are getting another Hegelian dialectic problem, reaction, solution with the fake Ukrainian conflict, and even with more bio labs. Here is video on the Zionist who run both sides of the fake conflict, you may not have seen:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ALIAuFdaqf4/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/IAyREIWpk6tw/https://www.bitchute.com/video/tUcNddMzEzZL/
and here is the fake Jan 6th circus:http://mileswmathis.com/reffitt.pdf
I believe the fake virus medical fear campaign that has convinced many cucked idiots to not only forfeit their natural rights over an illusion of security but has even confined millions of them, against all common sense to line up for the graphene oxide poison injection.
Joseph Olson
| #
As a trained structural engineer, I never accepted the Twin Towers tale, and research led me to write “Unequivocal 9/11 Nukes”. When published at VeteransToday.com a reader suggested the Pommer Report, posted at VT as “Breathtaking: Solving Nuclear 9/11”. This report had 50 slides and three 90 minute videos, but missed important gamma ray absorbers. My “Exposing NIST Jenga Game” at Veterans Today completes the WTC vaporization analysis.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Joseph,
Have you ever considered that the Twin Towers naturally became a ????? (I forget the term but the Russians have recently been accused of using one) BOMB.
Have a good day, Jerry
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Joseph,
You haven’t replied (https://principia-scientific.com/what-is-a-thermobaric-weapon/). Go to this link and google and read about thermobaric weapons.
If you read about it and ponder a bit, I am sure you, an engineer, will see the answer the articles question. This , even though I did not read about a specific example what one could be. For one is so simple to make that no one wants to give a clue to evil people who might not be able to answer the question themselves. Which is the reason I do not answer the question for PSI readers.
Have a good day, Jerry
Reply
Mark Tapley
| #
Hello Olson: Several engineers and demolition experts have stated that the building failures of 911 were standard demolition, including Danny Jawenko who suffered a fatal “accident” shortly after the interview here:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6D4dla17aA
Even the squibs can be seen as the thermite is detonated floor by floor. It should also be noted that all the beams were cut in uniform lengths so they could be loaded quickly onto tractor trailers and barges to to carried through the recently dredged canals to the two waiting scrap yards and on the way to China.
Another aspect of your assertion is that you evidently do not think It strange that no country has used the alleged nuclear weapons for over 70 years, except in fake explosions. Article here:http://mileswmathis.com/trinity.pdf
The subject of the alleged Atomic weapons has been exhaustively researched by Michael Palmer MD in his book “Revisiting Hiroshima.” Also is the recent book by Akio Nakatani ” Death Object, Exploding the Nuclear Weapons Hoax.” He also has several photos near the center of the “blast” where flimsy window frames were still intact, lots of trees (that consequently budded out) and wooden poles were left intact. Of the 50 bridges in Hiroshima, only one was destroyed and within 48 hours, full train service resumed over undamaged track and trestles.
I notice you reference Veterans Today which is just a front for the government’s propaganda. They even published a photo of Sharon Tate (daughter of intelligence officer) on the cover, before that long running psy op.
Reply
James McGinn
| #
JO:
As a trained structural engineer, I never accepted the Twin Towers tale, and research led me to write “Unequivocal 9/11 Nukes”.
JMcG:
So, you had doubts about the standard narrative of 9/11. Yet the title of your “research” report indicates nuclear explosions (in the middle of NY city) and that it is “unequivocal?” Do you know what this word means? It means that evidence is so widespread and obvious that it can’t even be equivocated? This is exactly the kind of whacked out rhetoric we get from the worst of the Global Warming whackos.
What do you have to say for yourself here, Joe?
Proper Role of Water in the Atmosphere
https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/episodes/Proper-Role-of-Water-in-the-Atmosphere-e1cs87g
James McGinn / Genius
Reply
RockyTSquirrel
| #
Reading this article and the comments that followed,
Reminds me of the kids game “Barrel of Monkeys”..
You start with one monkey, then begin lifting it up and see how many other monkey’s hang on..
If the monkey’s are agreeable, and you twist them slowly as you lift, you might just be able to get them all..
From the outside look in, you sometimes feel like your just part of the game..?.
RTS
Reply
Steven J. Blue
| #
From my Presentation: “The Fall – The Man Who Fell to Earth – Is Still Falling”:
Starting from the CIA (originally 1950’s): “Operation Mockingbird.
Again from the CIA: in 1981 William Casey says, “We’ll know our ‘disinformation campaign’ is Complete, when everything the American public believes is “false.”
< http://humansarefree.com/2019/10/operation-mockingbird-third-of-cia.html >
“The Church Committee’s conclusion accurately reflects the problems associated with Operation Mockingbird:
“In examining the CIA’s past and present use of the U.S. media, the Committee finds two reasons for concern. The first is the potential, inherent in covert media operations, for manipulating or incidentally misleading the American public. The second is the damage to the credibility and independence of a free press which may be caused by covert relationships with the U.S. journalists and media organizations.” 266
While it is deplorable for citizens of other countries to be subjected to a state-owned media, at least they can be aware of the biases and filter information accordingly.
We have been taught a lie from birth that the U.S. press is free from government meddling. In a situation where the manipulation is completely covert, the American public has been left unaware of the propaganda they have been ingesting for decades.
Rolling Stone Magazine, “The CIA and the Media,” October 20, 1977”
See: < https://www.coreysdigs.com/the-file-drawer/ >.
Enjoy,
Dr. Steven Bluè
Reply
clarence
| #
Spot on. For me main stream “news” is nauseating. So fake and full of hype and lies it is just plain pathetic. Yet sure seems like a lot of folks steadfastly believe.
Reply
striketheroot
| #
…which is why the PTB set up bot farms and Langley teams to infiltrate and torque the “free for all media” of the internet. If they ever pull off a False Flag internet shut down as has been talked about, the first victims will be those pesky sites that have resisted infiltration – national security doncha know …
Reply
Delta Maxx
| #
Conspiracy theorist. The mention of this term sends most folks running away because that is what they have been trained to do. It’s a CIA term designed to ridicule and defame anyone who dares question the narrative. Seeker of truth is a much better term and more likely to open up a lively conversation about what is really happening in the world.
Reply
Kevin Doyle
| #
Delta Maxx,
Thank you for being the only person to actually thoughtfully respond to the content of the essay.
The rest of the commenters appear to be psychologically damaged goods.
Cheers,
Kevin
Reply
Shinlee Shagowitz
| #
This website at times seems to have just a few “approved” theories that most authors and commenters come together on. Seems like the Covid hoax and Global warming fraud are mostly agreed upon. When Evolution comes up it starts to be more like 50 / 50. Then it appears to drop off pretty rapidly after that.
Don’t read much on JFK, 9/11, or the central banking fraud here but it appears the author is aware.
In my opinion there is so much more that few folks care to even ponder. Here are a few:
Dinosaurs. The more you look into this the faker it appears.
Nukes. Other than a few cheap historical films, no real proof that they exist. A tool of fear and control.
Chem trails. Certainly not the same as contrails.
History. One giant obfuscated lie written by the victors.
Weather manipulation. Wild fires, hurricanes, tornadoes in winter. Really?? HAARP?
The shape of the earth. Look into this and you might just go flat.
Space. Is it all just made in a Hollywood basement?
All mass shootings. Fake as can be.
Presidential elections. Always two goons. Dumb and Dumber. All puppets.
Individual country sovereignty. Possible that the world is already under a one world rule. Just hidden.
Protocols of Zion. Fit the world back in 1890. Fit the world like a glove today.
Moon landings. More holes than swiss cheese.
Cancer, disease, viruses. The medical industry lies through it’s teeth.
Free energy. May have existed and was free to all before the world was reset into the current system.
Carbon dating. Is it even real? If not how do they know how old anything is? They do lie.
Look into all of these and more just like you have Covid and Global warming and you just might question all of them.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Howdy,
I have checked the timing of duplicate posting and they are identical to the minute. And I noticed that sometimes it happens to others. So I am pretty sure that it is a PSI problem. But I ask for help so readers might consider that it my problem. For I make plenty of my own mistakes.
Yes discussions are essential. Here are couple of essays I wrote in 2018.
https://principia-scientific.com/the-problem-argumentation/
https://principia-scientific.com/the-solution-discussion/
Have a good day
Reply