New COVID at-home test dangerous and misleading
Recently, I’ve been writing fiction, satire, parody, to expose the insanity of the pandemic scam. This article is not that. This article is fact. Buckle up.
Since the beginning of the so-called pandemic, I’ve been attacking the value of the PCR diagnostic test from many angles. The primary angle, as my readers know, is: SARS-CoV-2 was never isolated, never proved to exist.
However, I’ve also ventured into the bubble world where a few billion people blindly accept the existence of the virus—and I’ve shown that even within that world, the internal contradictions and lies abound.
One again, now, I’m entering that bubble world, since the powers-that-be are widely promoting the use of an at-home test for the “virus.” This test is self-administered. No doctor, nurse, or technician is present. What could possibly go wrong, as millions of people perform the test on themselves?
Well, let’s lead off with DANGER.
The reference is an undated FDA document titled, “BinaxNOWTM COVID-19 Antigen Self TEST.” The Binax test kit is manufactured by Abbott.
Here is the key quote: “The Reagent Solution [included in the test kit] contains a harmful chemical (see table below). If the solution contacts the skin or eye, flush with copious amounts of water. If irritation persists, seek medical advice…”
Then the FDA document lists that harmful chemical: sodium azide.
Just how harmful is it?
For an answer, let’s look at a CDC document titled, “Facts About Sodium Azide.” We find this statement:
“Sodium azide is a rapidly acting, potentially deadly chemical that exists as an odorless white solid.”
Then there is this: “Sodium azide prevents the cells of the body from using oxygen. When this happens, the cells die. Sodium azide is more harmful to the heart and the brain than to other organs, because the heart and the brain use a lot of oxygen.”
Yes, as with all poisons, the degree of damage depends on the dosage, but you decide whether “potentially deadly,” as the CDC describes sodium azide, signifies a significant risk.
If you read the FDA document I referenced above, you’ll see that the reagent containing sodium azide is involved in the self-administered COVID test, and the whole test procedure is complex enough to allow fumbles and mistakes—such as a spill of the “deadly chemical.”
Don’t believe me? Try this FDA quote on for size:
“To perform the test, an anterior nasal swab specimen is collected by the patient, then 6 drops of extraction reagent from a dropper bottle are added to the top hole of the swab well. The patient sample is inserted into the test card through the bottom hole of the swab well, and firmly pushed upwards until the swab tip is visible through the top hole.
The swab is rotated 3 times clockwise and the card is closed, bringing the extracted sample into contact with the test strip. Test results are interpreted visually at 15 minutes based on the presence or absence of visually detectable pink/purple colored lines.”
See what I mean? Good luck.
Now let’s move on to the second problem with this at-home self-performed COVID test: it’s grossly misleading. The results are ambiguous.
The FDA document I’ve been quoting contains this gem: “The BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Self Test does not differentiate between SARS-CoV and SARS…CoV-2.”
BOOM. In other words, a positive test, indicating infection, could mean nothing more than infection with the 2003 “SARS virus”—and that “epidemic” was a dud. But wait, there’s more:
“Positive results do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease.”
Double trouble. The person who tests positive could simply be housing bacteria in his body, AND whatever germ the test is detecting may not even be causing disease.
Other than that, the at-home test is perfect.
This Abbott BinaxNow at-home COVID test is the market leader. About 75 percent of all retail test-kit sales in the US come from Abbott.
Back in the early spring of 2020, I told you the test was the key to faking the pandemic.
Now the government wants the population to perform the test-fakery on themselves.
With, of course, the added danger of exposing themselves to a highly destructive chemical in the process.
But don’t worry, be happy. On many days of every week, little Tony Fauci will appear on television and inform you that testing is necessary, and he’ll omit grisly details. Trust him.
And then march forward, secure in the knowledge that lies and omissions keep us safe.
See more here: nomorefakenews.com
Bold emphasis added
Header image: World Economic Forum
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Saeed Qureshi
| #
Scientifically speaking, a valid test CANNOT be developed for anything for which reference standard is not available, in this case, the virus. So, no matter how it is presented, there cannot be a valid virus test available. Period!
Reply
Tom
| #
Without standards no test is worth a hill of beans or a mountain of PCR tests. I am waiting for the printout that shows the results of these tests specifying covid or a variant from some other DNA remnant.
Reply
Alan
| #
Jon Rappoport continues with the argument that the virus has not been isolated by anybody. Where is the evidence for that? He must provide it.
He cannot ignore that more people have been dying from a respiratory illness that is apparently not flu. Does he also believe that the influenza virus has not been isolated? He is effectively accusing all the people involved in the development and manufacture of the Covid vaccines of lying. This is not credible.
Reply
Doug Harrison
| #
Again, Alan! You cannot prove a negative! Get it into your head! Your answer to Mr Rappaport would be to produce an isolated virus but ,of course you cannot so you keep putting up this straw man argument.
Reply
ЯΞ√ΩLUT↑☼N
| #
The CDC’s own report of July 2020 states “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA…“. The situation above hasn’t changed and I have 2 Aussie FOI replies from different states saying the same thing. THEY DON’T HAVE IT!! As you can clearly see, CDC had to fill in the blanks with other stuff. So what are they actually “testing” for? @Alan, you’ve been living under a rock of Bullshit-19 naïveté.
Reply
S Bailey
| #
BOOM? How is not being able to distinguish a virus that is no longer circulating a boom? Unless you’re distributing these tests to the technicians working on the next outbreak, it probably isn’t a big deal. The original SARS (leak) outbreak wasn’t a dud. It was much deadlier than v2.
Reply
ЯΞ√ΩLUT↑☼N
| #
If it was “much deadlier than v2”, how was it not a pandemic? How is it dead and gone in such a short time? Did it even exist?
Reply
S Bailey
| #
Higher fatality rate (7%), lower transmissibility. It mostly impacted Asia.
Reply
coronistan.blogspot.com
| #
Test for what? For a virus that does not exist? NEVER EVER!!!
This will stop when the people REALIZE an important fact: NO VIRUS! But then it’s probably already too late, and the global genocide will already have happened.
Break it down to the one single thing: show us the virus. And they can’t.
It’s more than ever necessary to debunk the criminal test procedure. These tests are not able to diagnose illness or an infection, as the infection theory was never proved, but much more important: THERE IS NO VIRUS AT ALL, so what do these tests test for?
There was never a pandemic, there is none, and there will be none. It’s all all giant hoax the enable things otherwise impossible, and they do it as always with Hegelian dialectic: create a problem (Co$hit), control the reaction (terror without end), implement the solution (Agenda 21/2030 WEF New Normal world wide slave system, transform humans into cyborgs).
All you need to know: THE ENTIRE VIROLOGY HAS BEEN REFUTED! There is no virus, no variant/mutation, and there was never a pandemic!
The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) and the Higher Regional Court (OLG) Stuttgart have made world history.
Here you can find the decision of the BGH, AZ.: I ZR 62-16 from 1.12.2016
The BGH and the Higher Regional Court Stuttgart have refuted all allegations about the suspected “measles virus”, the infection of measles and the measles vaccination.
Even more, it is now the case law of the highest court that the entire virology has been refuted.
You can find out why this is so in this text.
Here you can find the important judgment of the Higher Regional Court of Stuttgart, AZ.: 12 U 63/15 from 16.02.2016
https://wissenschafftplus.de
TRUST ULTRA TRUST NAOMI – https://www.bitchute.com/video/05OsGCekumz9/
Virology Debunks Corona – https://www.bitchute.com/video/YKktYdEGBRnP/
Blog: https://coronistan.blogspot.com
Reply