128 Research Studies Affirm Naturally Acquired Immunity to Covid-19
We should not force COVID vaccines on anyone when the evidence shows that naturally acquired immunity is equal to or more robust and superior to existing vaccines. Instead, we should respect the right of the bodily integrity of individuals to decide for themselves.
Public health officials and the medical establishment with the help of the politicized media are misleading the public with assertions that the COVID-19 shots provide greater protection than natural immunity.
CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, for example, was deceptive in her October 2020 published LANCET statement that “there is no evidence for lasting protective immunity to SARS-CoV-2 following natural infection” and that “the consequence of waning immunity would present a risk to vulnerable populations for the indefinite future.”
Immunology and virology 101 have taught us over a century that natural immunity confers protection against a respiratory virus’s outer coat proteins, and not just one, e.g. the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. There is even strong evidence for the persistence of antibodies. Even the CDC recognizes natural immunity for chicken-pox and measles, mumps, and rubella, but not for COVID-19.
The vaccinated are showing viral loads (very high) similar to the unvaccinated (Acharya et al. and Riemersma et al.), and the vaccinated are as infectious. Riemersma et al. also report Wisconsin data that corroborate how the vaccinated individuals who get infected with the Delta variant can potentially (and are) transmit(ting) SARS-CoV-2 to others (potentially to the vaccinated and unvaccinated).
This troubling situation of the vaccinated being infectious and transmitting the virus emerged in seminal nosocomial outbreak papers by Chau et al. (HCWs in Vietnam), the Finland hospital outbreak (spread among HCWs and patients), and the Israel hospital outbreak (spread among HCWs and patients). These studies also revealed that the PPE and masks were essentially ineffective in the healthcare setting.
Again, the Marek’s disease in chickens and the vaccination situation explains what we are potentially facing with these leaky vaccines (increased transmission, faster transmission, and more ‘hotter’ variants).
Moreover, existing immunity should be assessed before any vaccination, via an accurate, dependable, and reliable antibody test (or T cell immunity test) or be based on documentation of prior infection (a previous positive PCR or antigen test). Such would be evidence of immunity that is equal to that of vaccination and the immunity should be provided the same societal status as any vaccine-induced immunity.
This will function to mitigate the societal anxiety with these forced vaccine mandates and societal upheaval due to job loss, denial of societal privileges etc.
Tearing apart the vaccinated and the unvaccinated in a society, separating them, is not medically or scientifically supportable.
The Brownstone Institute previously documented 30 studies on natural immunity as it relates to Covid-19.
This follow-up chart is the most updated and comprehensive library list of 128 of the highest-quality, complete, most robust scientific studies and evidence reports/position statements on natural immunity as compared to the COVID-19 vaccine-induced immunity and allow you to draw your own conclusion.
I’ve benefited from the input of many to put this together, especially my co-authors:
- Dr. Harvey Risch, MD, PhD (Yale School of Public Health)
- Dr. Howard Tenenbaum, PhD ( Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto)
- Dr. Ramin Oskoui, MD (Foxhall Cardiology, Washington)
- Dr. Peter McCullough, MD (Truth for Health Foundation (TFH)), Texas
- Dr. Parvez Dara, MD (consultant, Medical Hematologist and Oncologist)
There follows a list and abstracts of the 128 studies on Evidence on natural immunity versus COVID-19 vaccine induced immunity.
To see them, click here: brownstone.org
Bold emphasis added
Header image: Getty Images
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Brian Quinn
| #
Somebody needs to send this to governor tard of Colorado
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
In my view, such studies and claims should not be promoted. Not only they are inaccurate but also promote a false narrative of COVID-19 or illness. So far there has not been any scientific evidence provided showing the existence of the virus which allegedly causes illness or COVID-19. Therefore, how could an immunity (with or without vaccine) be developed or measured against a virus or illness? It can’t be!
Statements, such as “The vaccinated are showing viral loads (very high) similar to the unvaccinated (Acharya et al. and Riemersma et al.), and the vaccinated are as infectious.” are simply false, because there is no method/test available at present which measures virus or virus load. This is not an opinion but a scientific fact.
https://bioanalyticx.com/some-questions-answers-about-the-virus-pcr-and-vaccines/
Reply
Charles Higley
| #
“This troubling situation of the vaccinated being infectious and transmitting the virus emerged in seminal nosocomial outbreak papers”
A “vaccine” that does not confer immunity and one that allows infection and transmission (which means the virus is indeed replicating in the vaxxed person) means that it IS NOT A VACCINE!
Then, they tell us the jabs are meant to lessen symptoms (despite the jabbed getting infected more easily, sicker, and dying more often, but who cares about that). Lessening symptoms is the definition of a therapeutic. They are clearly telling us that the jabs are therapeutics and there should be no EUA at all.
Reply
Allan Shelton
| #
Walensky is, in my view, a Sociopath.
Their behaviors must show a pattern of at least three of the following seven traits:
Lies, deceives others, uses false identities or nicknames, and uses others for personal
gain.
Doesn’t make any long-term plans. They also often behave without thinking of
consequences.
Shows aggressive or aggravated behavior. They consistently get into fights or physically
harm others.
Doesn’t consider their own safety or the safety of others.
Doesn’t follow up on personal or professional responsibilities. This can include
repeatedly being late to work or not paying bills on time.
Doesn’t feel guilt or remorse for having harmed or mistreated others.
Doesn’t respect social norms or laws. They consistently break laws or overstep social
boundaries.
Reply
PrimedPerspective
| #
So, this thing where you were peddling industrial pharma synthetic toxic ivermectin b ased on fraudulent basis…what’s that?
Perhaps I should remind you that ivermectin blocks essential natural function of proteolytic enzymes, which would be “dissolving” toxic, broken genetic material?
Proteolytic enzymes, such as serrapeptase, resulting in for instance a doubling of lung function in those with chronic airway disease…in a few weeks. While ivermectin, causes brain damage and blocks that function.
Now, I understand you likely won’t post this comment, but it’s something to consider if you’re legitimate.
So I’ll say this, since you’ve been peddling ivermectin and refusing to address the fraud of it, you will have to use ivermectin and NOT have access to proteolytic enzymes.
There isn’t anything I can’t destroy.
Reply
Doug Harrison
| #
“There isn’t anything I can’t destroy.” Classic sociopath statement as posted by Allan Shelton above.
Reply
Howdy
| #
Sounds like osiris….
Reply
Tom
| #
Billions of people already had resistance to fake covid if they were exposed to other coronaviruses.
Reply
Eric the Red
| #
Those unvaccinated who acquired natural immunity are important factors that are currently being ignored. But I’d also like to see some studies about unvaccinated asymptomatic people who have not yet been sick with Covid. That category of people seem to be the ones being used as murderous scapegoats for the vaxx tyrants. My contention is that asymptomatic unvaccinated people, either with or without natural immunity, are not contagious, since they don’t harbor the virus. If one of them does get sick, then obvious preventative measures would cause them to self-isolate and therefore not be any danger to anyone else.
I believe this issue is vitally important with respect to the political situation being enforced down our throats, but nobody is studying it. Until they do, we are headed into permanent tyranny without any ammunition to fight back.
Reply