Fatally Flawed COVID Vaccines Falling Like Dominoes

Written by Pierre Gosselin on . Posted in Current News

 

Taiwan halts Biontech Covid vaccines after European countries pause Moderna, Johnson & Johnson and Astra Zeneca. Governments are being extremely naïve to think a normally years-long process could be winged in a matter of weeks.

Over 95 percent effective and safe, so insisted vaccine manufacturers, government agencies and mainstream media. Everyone should get out and take the jabs so life could get back to normal.

Those who expressed doubts and warnings were immediately branded crackpots and banned by social media.

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla even said that people who spread disinformation about (against) coronavirus vaccines were “criminals.”

But while the US and much of the media continue to pretend that the vaccines are safe, more and more countries across Europe are advising or even banning the use of certain types for certain age groups due to “cardiovascular side effects”, which have been occurring at an unusual frequency.

Denmark halted use of AZ last April

Already last April there were concerns over safety as Denmark halted the use of the AstraZeneca vaccine after a number of recipients had developed “a rare” but serious blood-clotting disorder. The authorities opted to use Pfizer and Moderna instead, deeming them safe.

Scandinavia then pauses Moderna

But then by early October, Denmark also decided that Moderna was also no longer safe enough for use and, along with Sweden, paused its use for all young adults and children after studies uncovered cardiovascular side effects, as reported by Reuters.

Finland, Iceland, France follow

Finland then followed and paused the use of the Moderna for younger males, again because of cardiovascular issues, foremost myocarditis. Even though it was clear the cardiovascular side effects were occurring in many countries, the media and authorities still continued to call them “rare”.

Iceland also followed, as well as France. Though officials still call the side effects rare, they are obviously frequent enough to prompt their stoppage.

Johnson & Johnson “insufficient”

In early October, Germany’s Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) deemed the protection offered by the Johnson & Johnson shot to be “insufficient” and that anyone vaccinated with Johnson & Johnson “should receive a supplementary vaccination with an mRNA vaccine in the future”, The STIKO recommended boosters from the Moderna or Biontech vaccine.

Suddenly those vaccinated with J&J were no longer deemed fully vaccinated.

Germany now says “nein” to Moderna as well

As of today, also Moderna is no longer considered an adequate vaccine in Germany. The STIKO again has revised its recommendation: now advising “people under 30 years of age should only be vaccinated with ‘Comirnaty’ from Biontech (Pfizer) and no longer with ‘Spikevax’ from Moderna,” reports the Berliner Morgenpost.

Myocarditis and pericarditis

The reasons given for Germany’s Moderna halt were results of data from the Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI) and other international sources that showed myocarditis and pericarditis being observed too frequently in boys, girls, young men and women under 30.

Suddenly, Germany’s COVID vaccine options are now down to just one: Biontech (Pfizer). But that may change as well.

Taiwan halts Biontech…”concerns of myocarditis”

The issue of cardiovascular side effects now seems to be catching up to Biontech (Pfizer) as well. Taiwan has halted the 2nd dose of the Biontech vaccine for ages 12-17 “amid concerns of myocarditis,” according to the Taiwan News today. “According to U.S. statistics, the risk of youths experiencing myocarditis after receiving the second BNT dose is 10 times higher than after the first dose, CNA reported.”

Huge disappointment

 Increasingly it’s emerging that the COVID vaccines are neither as effective nor as safe as the public was earlier led to believe. Should this be a surprise? Not really if history is used as a guide.

Overly optimistic dreams of a rapid vaccine crumbling

Traditionally, developing, testing and getting vaccines to market was a long process that took many years. There were good reason for that – like safety. Governments were naïve to think it all could be done in just few months and that the whole process could just be shortcut and winged.

Today the vaccines are increasingly unsafe and ineffective, and the pandemic is spreading as fast as it ever has.

See more here: notrickszone.com

Bold emphasis added

Header image: Reuters/ Dado Ruvic

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Share via

Trackback from your site.

Comments (9)

  • Avatar

    very old white guy

    |

    One does not need to be much of a scientist to see that there really are no “vaccines” and that the experimental shots are killing tens of thousands and seriously injuring hundreds of thousands. The most amazing fraud in the history of the planet has been perpetrated.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Eileen bailey

      |

      What pandemic? The so called covid virus is a scam…it was never isolated….was only ever a string of computer code…..so how a PCR test could they if you had this non existent virus ? Empire new clothes people!!
      The vaccine was never a vaccine but an experimental gene therapy changing people into genetically modified organisms for life ..like GMO corn!
      All this contrary to nuremburg codes that human.bei g cannot be experimented on without their informed consent….nothing that could happen as the inserts in the drug box was left intentionally blank…..so neither the medic giving the jab or the person getting it had any idea what the jab contained and in most cases even who was the manufacturer of the experimental gene therapy.
      I don’t know what vested interests the writer of above article has but to talk about a pandemic is ridiculous.

      Reply

      • Avatar

        Michael Mazur

        |

        It would be good if every person vaxxed asked for the empty vial as souvenir.
        In time, before or after death, the serial numbers could be deciphered to reveal exactly what was there.

        Reply

    • Avatar

      Tom

      |

      Exactly. The corruption and deception is unbelievable.

      Reply

  • Avatar

    Charles Higley

    |

    Getting to the heart of the Scamdemic, we have to go back to 2009 when the WHO redefined “pandemic” as NOT the worldwide spread of a deadly disease, but the worldwide spread of any disease, that making the cold and flu season and its summer (in the Northern Hemisphere) background levels of infection into an ongoing pandemic. Just because they redefined “pandemic” it does not mean that their pandemic is deadly, although that is the definition we were raised to understand. This is why so many intelligent people are ready to assume Covid-19 is deadly, they were tight that way.

    However, Covid-19, or the wide-ranging salad of symptoms one could call Covid-19, need not exist, as half of people are diagnosed from symptoms and the other half by a PCR test that is demonstrably nonspecific and basically detects the flu season salad of viruses, including rhinovirus, influenza, and common coronaviruses. It’s like pretending a wolf is at your door by taking its temperature.

    The WHO and CDC have also redefined vaccines and vaccination to leave out the fact of natural immunity and canceling the idea that vaccines are meant to produce immunity, now it’s just “protection,” whatever that is.

    This entire Scamdemic is a psyop on the world and it’s a shame that people do not dig deeper to see how they have been gaslighted into being injected with some thing that, at best, has not effect or, at worst, can kill you. There are also a wonderful range of nonlethal effects that will plague people for decades. Bill Gates is all about thinning the herd and this is his gig.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Richard Noakes

    |

    Former Pfizer VP: 0.84% ‘Clear evidence of fraud’ in Pfizer study claiming 95% efficacy
    posted by Mordechai Sones September 30, 2021 10:58 am
    America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) Chief Science Officer Dr. Michael Yeadon yesterday said there is “clear evidence of fraud” in the Pfizer study that purports to claim 95% efficacy in their COVID-19 “vaccine”.
    Yeadon was commenting on an article appearing in The Lancet and critiquing a documentary that scrutinized a Pfizer efficacy study, calling the distinction raised therein between relative risk reduction and absolute risk reduction “accurate”.
    The Lancet article, entitled COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and effectiveness—the elephant (not) in the room, says that although attention has focused on vaccine efficacy and comparing the reduction of the number of symptomatic cases, “fully understanding the efficacy and effectiveness of vaccines is less straightforward than it might seem. Depending on how the effect size is expressed, a quite different picture might emerge.”
    The article continues: “Vaccine efficacy is generally reported as a relative risk reduction (RRR). It uses the relative risk (RR)—ie, the ratio of attack rates with and without a vaccine—which is expressed as 1–RR. Ranking by reported efficacy gives relative risk reductions of 95% for the Pfizer–BioNTech, 94% for the Moderna–NIH, 91% for the Gamaleya, 67% for the J&J, and 67% for the AstraZeneca–Oxford vaccines.
    “However, RRR should be seen against the background risk of being infected and becoming ill with COVID-19, which varies between populations and over time. Although the RRR considers only participants who could benefit from the vaccine, the absolute risk reduction (ARR), which is the difference between attack rates with and without a vaccine, considers the whole population. ARRs tend to be ignored because they give a much less impressive effect size than RRRs: 1·3% for the AstraZeneca–Oxford, 1·2% for the Moderna–NIH, 1·2% for the J&J, 0·93% for the Gamaleya, and 0·84% for the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccines.”
    “Pfizer reported that its vaccine showed a 95% efficacy,” explained the documentary, entitled COVID Shot or Not? “That sounds like it protects you 95% of the time. But that’s not actually what that number means.
    “That 95% refers to the ‘relative risk reduction’ (RRR), but it doesn’t tell you how much your overall risk is reduced by vaccination. For that, we need ‘absolute risk reduction’ (ARR).
    “In the Pfizer trial, 8 out of 18,198 people who were given the vaccine developed COVID-19. In the unvaccinated placebo group, 162 people out of 18,325 got it, which means that even without the vaccine, the risk of contracting COVID-19 was extremely low, at 0.88%, which the vaccine then reduced to 0.04%.
    “So the net benefit, the absolute risk reduction, that you are being offered in the Pfizer vaccine in 0.84%
    “That 95% number? That refers to the relative difference between the 0.88% and 0.04%. That’s what they call ‘95% relative risk reduction’. And relative risk reduction is well-known to be a misleading number, which is why the FDA recommends using absolute risk reduction instead. Which begs the question: How many people would have chosen to take the COVID-19 vaccines, had they understood that they offered less than 1% benefit?”
    In response, Dr. Yeadon said: “It’s worse, actually. In the Pfizer study from which the 95% claim comes, there’s clear evidence of fraud.
    “Why do I say that? Well, a study which is properly blinded means neither the subject, the study director, nor any other actor knows what each patient has received.
    “Patients in clinical trials are obligated to follow ‘the protocol’, which specifies must-dos & prohibitions.
    “If it’s blind to the end, how could one group end up with five times as many subjects having their data pulled prior to statistical analysis in the test group compared with the control group?”
    Yeadon expanded: “The story of how a large state within India solved its COVID-19 crisis is no surprise to those of us who’ve known since spring 2020 that our governments, media, and tech titans have been acting against our interests, both health as well as democratic.
    “We’ve known, for example, that highly qualified physicians and scientists are well able to treat and save most people infected by SARS-CoV-2.
    “The methodology is simple: Attack the virus and the inflammatory and ultimately thrombotic disease phases rationally by administering targeted, multi drug treatments.
    “These include Vitamin C and Vitamin D but in particular, Ivermectin, zinc and a zinc ionophore such as one of several old antibiotics like azithromycin.
    “Used in sequence depending on the presentation, in excess of 80% of patients avoid hospitalization anddeath, including in cohorts we regard as at high risk.
    “Peter McCullough and colleagues have put themselves in harm’s way professionally in pressing home these simple messages.
    “Two remarkable meta-analyses (the highest level of medical evidence, a review of randomized, controlled clinical trials), authored by Tess Laurie and Pierre Kory, show conclusively that if you could choose only one medical treatment, it would be ivermectin. It’s safe, we’ll-tolerated, off patent and cheap to make, yet HIGHLY effective as a treatment for COVID-19. Reviews by Tess Lawrie and Pierre Kory are in the most read papers this year.
    “Yet not one major media channel has bothered to tell us this. Instead, they’ve lied about ‘horse deworming’ drugs and made false claims about safety.
    “This is what Uttar Pradesh used in a few short weeks to crush soaring COVID-19 deaths in this large Indian state. They didn’t do much vaccination.
    “Vaccination has, separately, been shown by Steve Kirsch’s team, to have resulted in a median estimate of 150,000 deaths shortly after vaccination in the U.S.A. alone.
    “They made these calculations solely based on the publicly accessible database which collects adverse event reports, VAERS.
    “Additionally, they used mechanistically plausible assessments of the most common, serious adverse events, finding for example that pulmonary embolism occurs at over 400 TIMES the rate observed after any other vaccine types since the database began operations a few decades ago.
    “These novel technology gene-based agents cause our bodies to manufacture coronavirus spike proteins, and these alone are responsible for a substantial proportion of the adverse effects of being infected by the virus.
    “What have our governments, media, and technology titans been doing in the meantime?
    “Rubbishing the experts, attacking the publications, suppressing information everywhere, and banning accounts that persist in telling the truth.”
    Echoing remarks by Zelenko Protocol discoverer Dr. Vladimir Ze’ev Zelenko, Yeadon continued: “Having done this for well over a year, I’m confident that their actions comprise deliberate mass murder. Their objective appears to be to keep people as fearful as possible and receptive to vaccination. All of these claims are supported by plentiful public sources.
    “But the scandal of depriving people of effective treatments while coercing them into submission to dangerous vaccination is the worst thing that’s happened in the world for decades, arguably forever.”
    Dr. Yeadon concluded, urging people to “see the true scale of the lie before injecting their children.”
     The Lancet Study
    Doctors for COVID Ethics
    On The accompanying chart:
    Pfizer/BioNtech RRR 95.03% ARR From Jab 0.84%
    Moderna (NIH) RRR 94.08% ARR 1.24% From Jab
    Janssen RRR 66.62% ARR 1.19% From Jab
    Astrazeneca/ Oxford RRR 66.84% ARR 1.28% From Jab
    The Lancet

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Tom

    |

    Hey bourla…you, not us, are the biggest teller of lies and disinformation in the history of mankind. I am never taking any of your drug poisons.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via