Fully Vaccinated are suffering far higher rates of infection

IT’S OFFICIAL: Most of the UK’s vaccinated population are suffering far higher rates of infection than the unvaccinated, and it is getting worse by the day.

The UK’s Health Security Agency publishes detailed Covid statistics, which, for the last 7 weeks, have been tabulated by age-group and vaccination status. This now allows important questions to be answered.

The Agency says most vaccinated suffer substantially higher rates of infection, and their latest chart provides a snap-shot:

All of the UK’s 30-and-over vaccinated now endure far higher rates of infection than their unvaccinated counterparts. But as a snap-shot, this tells us nothing of how this arose, or how it may yet develop. Here we re-present the agency’s data in a time-series, to promote better understanding of the trends and implications.

The UK has vaccinated its population mostly in age order, from oldest to youngest, and very recently began vaccinating its under-18-year-old cohort. Being the UK’s most freshly vaccinated, they exhibit a very high degree of resistance to Covid infection: –

This very recently vaccinated cohort benefits from a 90 percent improvement in their infection rates, meaning their case incidence is 10 times better than that of their unvaccinated counterparts. This is impressive, and leads us to ask how long this high degree of protection might last?

The answer, unfortunately, seems to be not very long:

The previous UK age-group to be vaccinated was the 18–29-year-old cohort, of which half was fully vaccinated by some 9 weeks ago.

While still doing better than the unvaccinated of their age, they have nevertheless lost the greater part of their relative resistance to infection.

If they continue their trajectory, week 12 will see that benefit completely gone.

The earlier vaccinated age-group was the 30–39 cohort. Half was fully vaccinated around week 27, and by week 39 (again some 12 weeks later) had lost their enhanced infection resistance.

For at least for these two cohorts, it would seem their vaccine induced resistance reduced to zero in under three months.

Unfortunately, it does not stop there; Following the data shows the vaccinated descend well into negative territory, which may prompt us to ask how all earlier vaccinated cohorts are now doing?

In terms of vulnerability to infection, the answer is not so well:

The entire 40-79 vaccinated cohort is deeply negative, now below minus 50 percent, meaning they suffer more than double the infection rate of their unvaccinated counterparts, and there is no obvious end in sight; Given the consistent and strongly negative continuing trend for all adult cohorts, it is impossible to guess where or when these trajectories might bottom out.

But does the trend result from increased vulnerability amongst the vaccinated, or is improved resistance developing amongst the unvaccinated? The answer appears to be both:

Unvaccinated adults are enjoying significantly lowered infection rates, but the vaccinated are very clearly headed in the opposite direction:

This begs the question: Why should the vaccinated suffer mounting infection rates, while case-rates of the unvaccinated both declined and are lower? Surely, we should expect the vaccinated to do better – certainly no worse?

Yet, for all but one adult cohort, the exact opposite is true, and even for them, it seems likely for not much longer:

It has been suggested infection amongst the unvaccinated has induced robust natural immunity leading towards their herd-immunity. That may well be a factor, but, as we have seen, the vaccinated have similarly been infected, and at least for the 40-79 cohort, at much higher rates. Why should this not benefit the vaccinated as well?

Are we to understand infection after vaccination may not produce similar broad immunity?

Vaccination is intended to alter subsequent immune response to infection, which is, of course, the whole point; It is conceivable this altered response may mute the development of broad long-lasting immunity that otherwise typically results from natural infection.

That might then leave the vaccinated more open to re-infection, and might help explain these results. But this remains speculation, we simply do not know today.

What we do know from the UK data, is that anyone vaccinated more than few months ago is at greatly higher risk of Covid infection, and is therefore greatly more likely to be infected than their unvaccinated counterparts.

Much has been said and written to show the vaccinated are equally capable of transmitting Covid.

But because their symptoms are often muted, they are also more likely to be out and about; add this to escalating infection rates, and there can be little doubt the vaccinated now constitute by far the greatest Covid transmission risk.

In light of this, vaccine passports are clearly senseless; They are nothing more than an invitation to infection, for which no justification can now possibly remain.

See more here: theexpose.uk

Bold emphasis added

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (13)

  • Avatar

    richard

    |

    ADVERSE EFFECTS OF MESSENGER RNAVACCINESAn Evidence Reviewfrom the Penn Medicine Center for Evidence-based PracticeDecember2020Project director:……………………..Nikhil K. Mull, MD (CEP)Lead analyst: ………………………..Matthew D. Mitchell, PhD (CEP)Clinical review:………………………Patrick J. Brennan, MD. (CMO)Keywords: COVID-19, vaccine, messenger RNA, adverse effectsEVIDENCE SUMMARYThere are no specific guidelines for use of messenger RNA (mRNA)vaccines or contraindications to mRNA vaccines.No large trials of any mRNA vaccine have been completed yet.The only evidence on safety of mRNA vaccines comes from small phase I and phase II trials of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, with follow-up typically less than two months.Systemic adverse events such as fatigue, muscle aches, headache, and chills are common.Severe systemic adverse events were reported by 5 to 10 percent of trial subjects. Localized adverse events such as pain at the injection side are common.Both systemic and localadverse events usually are resolved within one or two days.The rate and severity of adverse events appears to be higher for the second dose of vaccine than for the first.Higher vaccine doses appear to increase the rate and severity of adverse events.Larger trials of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are in progress, with results expected in mid-2021.There is not sufficient evidence to support any conclusions on the comparative safety of different mRNA vaccines.Direct evidence on the comparative safety of mRNA vaccines and other vaccines is lacking.https://www.uphs.upenn.edu/cep/COVID/mRNA%20vaccine%20review%20final.pdf

    Reply

  • Avatar

    T. C. Clark

    |

    The Johns-Hopkins site has graphs and the UK seems to be currently having a problem because the spike in cases does not seem to want to recede…the recent USA spike is receding….However, according to Dr. David Martin there is no virus so he should prove it by exposing himself to as many patients as possible who are ill….of course he may have already had it and is mostly immune. One of the most remarkable graphs is India which seemed to be avoiding the virus…then a huge spike…now the spike is gone. Russia seems to have a problem with a spike still climbing.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Stevet

      |

      Your point? You have covered several topics.
      You haven’t been clear in your comment what it is you are saying.

      Reply

    • Avatar

      ЯΞ√ΩLUT↑☼N

      |

      In the case of India and its “spikes”, they started using Ivermectin which reduced infection and deaths markedly, then they canned it and went to the quackxines, driving another spike.

      Reply

      • Avatar

        T. C. Clark

        |

        There is only one huge spike for India shown on the Johns-Hopkins site….many countries have different patterns. Ivermectin was not used readily throughout India at once when the spike began. It is possible that India had so little contact with China that the virus was initially avoided…then when it hit it spread rapidly due to the crowded cities and the contagiousness. The UK and the Netherlands don’t seem to be getting rid of the virus. Russia and some eastern European countries are increasing in numbers but not all countries report the same or use the same vaccines. China simply lies. I expect this thing to be mostly over by the end of the year.

        Reply

        • Avatar

          Squidly

          |

          “Ivermectin was not used readily throughout India”

          WRONG .. I know first hand from friends and coworkers who live in various places in India, including Bangalore, Deli, etc. That is not what they report at all. One can venture into any common corner drug store and purchase a “survival” pack that includes Ivermectin, HCQ and a few other things for about the equivalent of $2 US. India has been widely promoting this for a while now. Current COVID numbers show virtually a non-existence of “COVID” throughout most of India. I speak to these people in India every single day. One of my best friends lives in Bangalore.

          Reply

          • Avatar

            T. C. Clark

            |

            Squid, you apparently deliberately cut my quote short….”Ivermectin was not used readily throughout India when the spike began” If Ivermectin had been used widely, there would not have been the huge spike in cases. Ivermectin was not known in the beginning and even now is still disputed by some.

          • Avatar

            Herb Rose

            |

            T.C.
            India, being tropical, was using Ivermectin and HCQ to fight parasites and malaria long before Covid arrived on the scene. It had a very low incidence of COVID until the minister of health discourages its use and went towards the vaccine. This brought about the India or as it’s own the Delta variant. The minister of health died of a heart attack after getting the vaccine and the use of Ivermectin, HCQ, zinc, Vitamin D, and antibiotics was promoted and COVID disappeared. Subsequently the Indian Department of Justice charged the WHO official that discouraged the use of Ivermectin with murder.
            Herb

  • Avatar

    Moffin

    |

    There is a strong possibility that mutations caused by the so called vaccines will manifest, especially with booster shots, and these will be recorded as covid 19 cases. Hence more covid shots.

    This tragic opera is about to progress past the opening orchestrations.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Squidly

      |

      It is going to get very real and very ugly in just a couple of months. I encourage people to brace and prepare themselves. It’s going to get very bad.

      Reply

    • Avatar

      Jerry Krause

      |

      Hi Moffin and PSI Readers,

      Relative to the mutations to which you and others commonly refer, here is a bit of history, which (history) I consider is quite important because my experience is that historical facts are REAL and cannot be debated.

      It is a historical fact there was this chemical (molecule I believe) known as DDT. It really does not matter what DDT was, what matters is what DDT did. It killed certain insects when it began to be used to kill barn (and house) flies and mosquitoes of various kinds.

      But after the first year of use on our farm, it didn’t much kill barn flies the second year of its use. And it is understood that this did not occur because the barn flies mutated after the first year. What was understood (reasoned) was that there were two DIFFERENT KINDS OF BARN FLIES which couldn’t be previously distinguished from each other.

      Now, people are pretending viruses mutate within a year.

      However, DDT also killed the insect generally known as mosquitoes. Which we know can cause human diseases. But we can distinguished one kind of a misquote from another and know that only one kind of misquote causes malaria. But we also know that DDT kills all kinds of misquotes and still does. We understand that this is because there were no kinds of mosquitoes which ever were immune to the effects of DDT.

      Just some simple historical facts for you and PSI Readers to ponder.

      Have a good day, Jerry

      Reply

  • Avatar

    Dale Horst

    |

    Funny how this seems to be happening in countries where the government took guns away from it’s citizens. I take criticism well. Go for it.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via