Calls To Make Meat and Car Use ‘prohibitively expensive’

A report produced by Cambridge University academics has called for foods with so-called high carbon footprints, such as dairy and meat, to be made more expensive in order to ‘save the planet’.

The Cambridge University-led study published by the British Medical Journal (BMJ) says that “education” alone on changing diets towards more plant-based habits and abandoning car ownership is not enough.

The report, “Changing Behaviour for Net Zero 2050” instead suggests there be “rapid, radical changes” to pricing in order to make normal food consumption and travel prohibitively expensive.

Interventions that decrease the affordability of unhealthy unsustainable options and increase the affordability of healthier sustainable options would also help change public behavior,” the report said, including “using taxes and other price-based mechanisms to reflect the emissions associated with different products and activities”.

Increase prices of carbon-intense foods, including processed and red meat, dairy products and ultra-processed foods” and “reduce prices of low-processed and plant-based foods”, the report advised, while saying that package sizes and portions for meat, dairy, and other “energy-dense foods” should also be reduced.

Subsidies for livestock farming should also be cut, they said.

The report also claimed that even if public support for taxing meat off their plates was low now, they would accept it once the interventions are implemented, comparing it to the acceptance in large cities of the introduction of congestion charges, “reflecting both changes in attitudes and acceptance of the status quo”.

In forcing people to abandon their cars, the scientists suggest increasing prices of fossil fuels and charging private car owners for road use, including “congestion zone charging and increased parking costs”.

Restricting availability and attractiveness of car use — eg, car-free zones, limited parking, traffic calming measures, and low-speed limits” was also recommended.

This is not the first time a body has recommended certain foods be taxed. In July, a review by the National Food Strategy group commissioned by the government said salt and sugar used to produce foods or in catering to be taxed.

The NFS stopped short of calling for a meat tax but said that Britons should eat one-third less meat in order for the UK to reach the net-zero carbon emissions target by 2050.

Millions in taxpayers’ money should go into the development of “alternative proteins” such as lab-grown meat, according to the review, which also recommended fruits and vegetables be prescribed on the NHS.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s initial response to the report was that he did not feel “attracted to the idea of extra taxes on hard-working people, let me just signal that”.

However, the government’s existing environmental and public health proposals could already hurt poorer Britons, according to a report from the Food and Drink Federation from July.

See more here: climatechangedispatch

Header image: World Scholarship Forum

Bold emphasis added

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (8)

  • Avatar

    very old white guy

    |

    The goal is not to save the planet, the goal is to kill people.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Stephen

      |

      I was going to say their is seemingly no end to these ‘learned’ and highly compromised idiots.

      Reply

      • Avatar

        Stephen

        |

        I was going to say there is seemingly no end to these ‘learned’ and highly compromised idiots

        Reply

  • Avatar

    Geraint Hughes

    |

    Cambridge is no longer a university. It is a centre of indoctrination. It teaches magic to acolytes whom believe their fables and fallacies to be science and reality. Its quite mad really.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Alan

      |

      Unfortunately, it is not just Cambridge. At one time we could rely on universities to bring rational debate to issues, but not anymore. The madness is set to continue for a long time and there cannot be a good ending. We now have Kamikaze Johnson doing his best to destroy everything that gives us a high standard of living.

      Reply

  • Avatar

    Tom

    |

    Academics are useless for anything. They spout theories and ideas that are never tested in the real world. Failures, one and all. Arrogant and overbearing believing they are somehow intelligent…hardly.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Artelia

    |

    Organic meat is already very expensive.
    How will this affect organic meat and dairy?

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Kevin Doyle

    |

    The Romans believed the Empire was more important than the individual.
    The Chinese Communists believe the communist State is more important than the individual, as did the Russian Communists.
    The Germans believed the Third Reich was more important than the individual.
    Today’s ‘Eco-Warriors’, motivated by a false Theory, believe they and the State are more important than the individual…

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via