COVID Fraud: Lawyers File Action Against Corrupt Australian Government
Principia Scientific International has received information from the Concerned Lawyer’s Network. This is the first part of their legal action explained. We will do a follow-up article on their actions and evidence.
TO: Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews,
Victorian Chief Health Officer Brett Sutton,
Prime Minister Scott Morrison,
Federal Chief Health Officer Paul Kelly
AND to others named in the schedule attached.
Signed on behalf of Concerned Lawyers Network:
Maria Rigoli B.A. LLB. (Melbourne University) Acc.Spec (Fam)
Jeff Tran B Science LLB (Melbourne)
Russell Sumner LLM GDipDisRes Post GradDLegal Practice (UK)(LLB) (HONS)
Shemarrah Davis LLB (Monash University)
Tony Nikolic LLB Criminology (Uni. Western Sydney) LLM (College of law)
Liesl Tziolis B.A, LLB, (Hons, Uni of Qld), MBA
Concerned Lawyers Network All “exhibits” referred to are found on: www.concernedlawyersnetwork.net
Re: Notice of Liability & Potential Claims
We, the undersigned on behalf of the Concerned Lawyers Network (on behalf of pending clients, victims, and those with legal standing and this lawyer network) write this open letter to request a review and wind back of measures taken by Victorian and Australian governments which were based on the premise of a Covid19 pandemic existing and/or continuing, leading to declared states of emergency, states of disaster and other related legal measures. We respectfully give you notice of potential liabilities, should there be continued reliance on this premise and subsequent overreach of powers, whilst there is overwhelming evidence against such a premise.
SUMMARY POINTS
1. Covid19 (if it can be isolated) may simply be another coronavirus such as the flu or common cold. Patents for Covid19 medical testing kits, however, were manufactured and sold many years ago to many countries including Australia.
- The WHO has falsely declared a pandemic in relation to Covid19.
- Covid19 death statistics in Australia as well as in other nations have been manipulated.
- Covid19 tests are unreliable to test any specific disease.
- There are global agendas behind the declaration of Covid19 pandemic, to benefit certain foreign individuals and companies financially and to gain control of populations including in Australia.
- There is no pandemic in Australia according to medical evidence-at most a seasonal flu type epidemic, nothing justifying declaring states of emergency or disaster. Covid19 has been found to be a type of flu (coronavirus) with an
estimated 99.9% survival rate across all age groups with the highest risk groups of over 65 estimated at 99.6%. - Confined steps can be taken to take care of elderly or immune-compromised people more likely to suffer from Covid19 as has been the case in the past with influenza, without restricting the freedoms of masses of healthy people.
- There are serious conflicts of interest between some representatives of government, appointed health officials and taskforces, and pharmaceutical corporations and global interests that prioritise their own profits and control,
instead of the health interests of Australians. - Australians have been exploited through fear, misinformation and obstruction of freedoms as a result of the continuation of the false statement that there is a Covid19 pandemic and the insistence that they must obey disproportional laws, rules and directions that curtail them physically, mentally and financially causing them much harm including in some cases death.
- Key decision-makers in Australian governments and the public service have enormous conflicts of interests relating to vaccine com panies and other medical manufacturers and suppliers, influencing their decisions. They are also being influenced by global players and global policy instead of the Australian people who elected them. Covid19 has been used as a cover to bring about police states and financially benefit vaccine companies as well as those who with vested interests in vaccine companies and controlling populations.
- All ministers and other persons to whom this letter is addressed are PUT ON NOTICE of Personal Civil And Criminal Liability potentially arising against them for any current or future intentional or reckless continuation of misrepresentation of information and misuse of power of of fice, causing direct loss and damage to Australians.
- All other officeholders to which this letter is copied to, are also put on notice of the evidence and potential civil and criminal liability arising out of future claims that may also possibly affect them arising out of their decision making or carrying out of decisions of their superiors should such actions violate citizens’ human rights.
- On behalf of our clients, victims and other interested Victorians and Australians, and the lawyers network, we request an immediate wind back of lockdowns and other disproportionate measures made, and a full open up of the economy and society to the way it was prior those measures being put in place and enforced (pre-January 2020).
- In addition to potential claims based on future personal liability, we reserve our clients’ rights to take legal action against you with respect to past damage and losses incurred up to this point in time.
- We also request your response to specific questions in this letter addressed to you.
OPENING STATEMENT
As experienced lawyers, we are evidence based.
From expert and other evidence that is publicly available in Australia and worldwide, there appears to be strong evidence that there can no longer be a reliance on the premise that the Covid19 pandemic exists. Further, it appears evident that the state and federal governments have:
- failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians of sufficient relevant and independent evidence of a pandemic to justify the declarations of state of emergency and state of disaster; and
- failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians, (or take into account in their decision making relevant and independent evidence), of Covid19 being confirmed as an isolated virus or how effective the testing for it actually is; and
- failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians of, or take into account in their decision making, the evidence of effective treatment for Covid19 such as Invermectin and Hydroxychloroquine and any good reasons why such medications were banned all of a sudden. This is especially contradictory, since Hydroxychloroquine has been used for decades safely all around the world both as an oral vaccine and treatment to many diseases including Lupus and Malaria and doctors and evidence worldwide reveals reports of up to 100% cure rate for Covid19 when treated early; and
- failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians of, or take into account in their decision making relevant and independent evidence of the serious side effects of vaccines in general including death, and the need for years of successful research before releasing medications in general; and
- failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians of, or take into account in their decision making, financial or vested interests (of ministers, health officials and public services and subordinate bodies appointed by them), in vaccine production, and the legal protection granted to the vaccine companies in the event of injury or death from citizens taking vaccines; and
- failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians through health policy, on how we are best to increase our health and immune systems to resist infections; and
- failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians that Covid19 deaths reported are inaccurate in numbers and specific not random, and include comorbidity deaths. Focus has been instead shifted to fear of the deadliness of the disease, and away from the facts that most mortality affected the elderly or immune-compromised who are already susceptible due to preexisting conditions or comorbidity; and
- failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians of, or take into account in their decision making, the available relevant and independent medicine and science about viruses, exomes and the body’s natural defence systems and instead relied on a select few researchers many of which themselves have vested financial or other interests in foreign, global and transnational companies which are of or related to foreign pharmaceutical and vaccine corporations; and
- failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians of, or take into account in their decision making, the true nature of the covid19 tests being used, that they are not reliable, focusing instead on numbers of “positive cases” including false positives and undiagnosed positives when the tests are deemed by the governments own TGA standards not reliable and there has to date not been any credible isolation of Covid19 in any case; and
- failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians of, or take into account in their decision making, the fact that the covid19 tests being used were manufactured and distributed to countries around the world (with Australian purchasing great quantities) since at least 2017 over 3 years before the surprise outbreak of Covid19 in late 2019, and that patents specifically for the Covid19 test kits were already applied for in 2015 some 5 years ago which gives rise to suspicions of a planned pandemic; and
- failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians about, or take into account in their decision making, the ramifications of providing financial incentive to clinicians and hospitals whenever they register a death under Covid19; and
- failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians about, or take into account in their decision making, the ramifications of financial incentives and loans the Federal Government receives from the IMF and WHO and other foreign bodies or corporations, in exchange for following the directions on declaring a pandemic and how to manage it and what restrictions to place on business and freedom of movement
from these global bodies.
Further, most of the mainstream media on television and print, appears to have been influenced by state and federal governments in so far as such media has avoided challenging the government narrative about Covid19, and has therefore also failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians who are entitled to see all relevant unbiased evidence without censorship. In addition, much of the mainstream media has been disparaging of any person questioning the government narrative and science and legalities relied on, even when they are questioned by experienced doctors and lawyers. Many of us wonder if the government has itself
withheld relevant information and facts from the media, or whether the media are in fact complicit with the government in recklessly or intentionally failing to report relevant facts to the public, in an unbiased true journalistic basis.
LEGAL QUESTIONS
Regardless of whether one believes the Covid19 virus exists, does not exist, exists organically or exists man made/manufactured or otherwise, the questions to answer in light of available relevant and independent evidence are:
- What is a “pandemic” as opposed to an “epidemic”? Was there or is there still a “pandemic” in the true sense of the word?;
- Were the measures that were and some still are taken in response to the alleged pandemic by the Australian and state governments restricting its citizens – justified and proportionate and compatible with international law, human rights laws and the Australian Constitution?
- If there is no pandemic or the alleged pandemic has abated, or there was instead a seasonal epidemic or something less, can any of the measures taken by governments still be justified and if so up to what point in time?
- If there is no such justification and in light of available independent and relevant evidence, what are the legal liabilities and exposures of Australian decision makers in the chain of command? (taking into account, inter alia, the directly related losses and damages including inter alia suicides, increase in crime and domestic violence, mass mental health deterioration, curtailed freedoms to travel, unlawful arrests, unlawful detainment, unlawful testing, unlawful mass financial losses to businesses, employees, not for profit and other organisations and individuals, closed and bankrupted businesses, interference with landlord and tenant rights, interference with doctor and patient relationships, infringement on property use, mortgage foreclosures, failure to account for basis of decision making, misleading the people and a crashed economy).
These are not just scientific and medical questions, but questions of law.
FACTS & EVIDENCE
DEFINITION OF “PANDEMIC”
According to the World Health Organisation (WHO):
“A pandemic is defined as “an epidemic occurring worldwide, or over a very wide area, crossing international boundaries and usually affecting a large number of people”. The classical definition includes nothing about population immunity, virology or disease severity. By this definition, pandemics can be said to occur annually in each of the temperate southern and northern hemispheres, given that seasonal epidemics cross international boundaries and affect a large number of people. However, seasonal epidemics are not considered pandemics.”
The definition was changed by the WHO in 2020 and now appears to describe what is a regular seasonal epidemic of colds and flu. We do not believe this definition can legally or morally or ethically stand to influence health policy and modelling for nations around the world including Australia.
FALSE PANDEMICS OF THE PAST
A case study of the 2009 Swine Flu Pandemic reveals a European Parliamentary Inquiry determined that WHO manipulated information to fraudulently declare a pandemic, activating lucrative ‘sleeping contracts’ with pharmaceutical companies. It is also revealed that the Australian Department of Health misrepresented statistical data to alarm the public about swine flu, although this was alarm was unjustified. The government ordered vaccines prepared before there was any evidence that swine flu was more serious than other strains of flu (in the end, it wasn’t.) see page 120 and 154-159 HARRISON REPORT.
In the past the WHO has been found to have falsely declared a “pandemic” for example the Swine Flu. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2010-06-11/34926 see EXHIBIT RESEARCH REPORTS PANDEMIC
Modelling has been based on the WHO’s shifting goal posts of what a “pandemic” really means. The modelling used for international policy response is based on unpublished, unverified 13 year old code. (Some) Australian modellers have appear to have deep financial ties to pharmaceutical companies and conflicted global power structures such as the Gates Foundation and Gavi (Vaccine Alliance).
For the full document and the evidence please LINK HERE. We will add further sections of their research and case against the government in future articles.
Please DONATE to HELP support our ongoing battle to expose the COVID-19 FRAUD!
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method
Trackback from your site.
Dean Michael Jackson
| #
Firstly, PCR is an amplification tool, it can’t detect/identify. Period.
Cycle threshold (CT) is not only arbitrary, it’s meaningless, and an abuse of Kary Mullis’ amplification tool.
CT is merely an arbitrary number of amplifications above an equally arbitrary lower number of amplifications referred to as “background level”…
https://www.wvdl.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/WVDL.Info_.PCR_Ct_Values1.pdf
The PCR amplifies nucleotide sequences exponentially…
https://www.khanacademy.org/science/ap-biology/gene-expression-and-regulation/biotechnology/a/polymerase-chain-reaction-pcr
…up to approximately 40 amplifications,[1] therefore any differences between the CT level and background level are meaningless. A CT of 21x merely means there were 21 amplifications. A CT of 30 has 30 amplifications. A CT of 21x simply means the nucleotide sequence was amplified 21 times, not that there is “strong positive reactions indicative of abundant target nucleic acid”…
https://www.wvdl.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/WVDL.Info_.PCR_Ct_Values1.pdf
Secondly, a person who is asymptomatic cannot spread a disease, since a disease requires one to be sick, showing symptoms, and asymptomatic carriers (and presymptomatic) do not show symptoms.
Thirdly, only those who are sick and cough or sneeze can spread a viral pathogen, not by merely talking or breathing…
“We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to Covid-19 as face-to-face contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic Covid-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes). The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.”
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2006372
At my blog, read the articles…
‘House of Cards: The Collapse of the ‘Collapse’ of the USSR’
‘Playing Hide And Seek In Yugoslavia’
Then read the article, ‘The Marxist Co-Option Of History And The Use Of The Scissors Strategy To Manipulate History Towards The Goal Of Marxist Liberation’
Solution
The West will form new political parties where candidates are vetted for Marxist ideology/blackmail, the use of the polygraph to be an important tool for such vetting. Then the West can finally liberate the globe of vanguard Communism.
My blog…
https://djdnotice.blogspot.com/2018/09/d-notice-articles-article-55-7418.html
[1] Thereafter amplification growth is less than exponential.
Reply
Michael McDougall
| #
The rush for a vaccine to broadly disperse amongst the community is ridiculous. Is the ability to critical think been list somehow? If this virus was man made, then released not only from a lab but from an entire country with the aide of the very organisation that is charged to prevent such an occurrence it seems pointless to take an untried and normally tested “anything”. Shutting the gate after the horse has bolted. The ability for COVID 19 to become COVID 20 or something nastier seems all too possible to worry about a vaccine for something that technically isn’t even a pandemic. Where’s my ebola vaccine?
Reply
Fred B
| #
It being a lab virus I am told that it is unstable and unlikely to mutate or survive past the first round. I argued in comments last July that if we were to get a second wave, it would likely be another more lethal lab virus, but two in row “escaping” likely would end up in wide-spread establishment dissent and be more deadly for our governments, and they would refrain. Yet, if they are capable of doing what they are doing now, they could do anything. What I thought back then to be most disturbing was all of the evidence of the planning, not just with the long-term pandemic planning of the Rockefeller and Gates Foundations, but with our governments. In February, relying on the WHO and modeling with data from the Diamond Princess, together with far less sensational stats from South Korea, the US authorities cleared out hospital wards and ER’s in March in preparation for the “deadly virus” which they expected to kill millions, or up to 1% of those infected. . Clearly the numbers when they came in were far less than expected. Few hospitals were deluged, if any, and in fact there were many wards set aside for the expected pandemic entirely empty, not only in the US but all over. Now, one would think that with such results with only the nearly dead dying, which any flu could have been their last straw, that our governments would have rejoiced, opened up the hospitals to everyone and done away with the public restrictions. But no, they were clearly disappointed. Things obviously did not go according to the plans of the central planners controlling our governments and holding the purse strings. Not only no rejoicing that so few had actually died, but they went the other way and started paying US hospitals to characterize any death they could as a Covid one. Fake news gave the impression thousands were dying, hospital wards were filled, and our health care workers were such heroes. This went on all over North America.
What this fakery does is to destroy the excuse of justifiable error based on the false expectations from the faulty modeling, and puts our governments the same bed as the central planners who actually must have wanted more people to die, but could not predict how the virus would actually spread outside of controlled lab conditions when actually released in the public. The awkward and see-through inflation of the death numbers was obviously not very well planned. Had say 10 million in the world actually died, the nudity of our emperors would not be so apparent. What this should show is not just fraud but the fact that the people running things and clearing the way for things like the Great Reset are all sociopaths, and that our governments in doing their bidding are not any better.
Reply
Brian James
| #
These doctors are speaking truth and are not bought off!
Oct 6, 2020 Reaching Immunity | A Private Summit of Epidemiologists Against Lockdowns
On October 3, 2020, in the living room of the Stone House of the American Institute for Economic Research, top epidemiologists, economists, and journalists gathered to discuss the global emergency created by the unprecedented use of state compulsion in the management of the Covid-19 pandemic.
https://youtu.be/jtiInz1DWuA
Reply
Nichola Meehan
| #
Thank you for your fine efforts to expose this hideous assault on human freedom and dignity. Do you have a similar group of legal minds representing the people of New Zealand, whose government is equally misrepresenting this ‘flu’? This misrepresentation and fear mongering has created and continues to create a disproportionate fear of an unknown unidentified virus and division between individuals and groups within our population, not to mention unbelievable social and financial distress through misinformation and manipulation. I would be extremely relieved to know that similar action is being taken against similar corruption in New Zealand.
With extreme gratitude. Nichola Meehan
Reply
Vic
| #
This is great news, for me, im 79 and i will never taje the vaccination,
If they come near me with it whoever holds the needle will be putting his or hef life at risk as i will kill if its necesary to protect my Constitutional right to abstain from medical procedures.evety politician in Australia are sitting in treason and sll must face charges of treason against the people, the Constitution aknow d the Crown. We have the evidence in hard copy of the whole dorry traitorous mess
Reply
Michaelnc58
| #
Agree whole heartedly.
Completely politicised public health emergency.
Deaths numbers in UK are ANY death within 28 days of testing +ve for Covid – guranteed over-reporting (look up UK website)
Large financial incentives for Covid illness and death for hospitals are a fact, that are guranteed to inflate numbers.
Massive profits for Covid vaccine, rushed through with zero liability – ca’t make this stuff up.
Corporations making huge money and politicians freightening the population so they can ‘save the world’ without worrying about elections and opposing voices.
The media and governments are no longer trustworthy and the process seems corrupted beyond redemption.
But,
The brief seems over-broad and conspiratorial for a serious letter (even if it may be true)
“Patents for Covid19 medical testing kits, however, were manufactured and sold many years ago” – Really? First time I heard this. Extraordinary claims need extra-ordinary proof.
” falsely declared a pandemic” – how do you prove this semantic, and what is the utility.
“… to benefit certain foreign individuals and companies financially and to gain control of populations including in Australia.” – may be true, but good luck proving this vague accusation.
I would have though a tight clear keystone accusation that’s provable in a court of law would be the way to go.
Reply
Heather
| #
Thrilled to see this happening! Great work, keep it up!
Reply
Mary Mulraney
| #
How come us every day people can see what is going on and our governments can’t or choose to be part of this sicking game of depopulation. They should all be charged with Treason. Think that means a firing squad?
Reply
Leon Alberts
| #
By planning, implementing and executing the intended Covid-19 assault on health has turned out to be an assault on the economy and basic human rights.
We applaud the Concerned Lawyer’s Network – it surely takes a massive amount of time, energy and fortitude to launch such a campaign but inevitably has to be done – if not the sheeple of this world will be led to slaughter.
Reply
Jason Stephenson
| #
Thank you very much for the work you are doing.
Reply
Jim McConnell
| #
Thanks for your effort to show up the traitors in our governments and the media. Keep up the great work!!!!
Reply