Claim to Finding Missing Part of Universe? Big Bang Baloney!
Scientists have long assumed that about 40 percent of the universe’s visible matter — the kind makes up everything we can see and touch — was missing, never having been detected.
Now, a team of researchers from France’s National Center of Scientific Research (CNRS) says it’s finally found it — hidden away in the diffuse filaments of the gigantic, galaxy-connecting cosmic web. The research, published Friday in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics, revealed the missing matter after scientists took a new look at a pile of 20-year-old data.
Hidden Web
The filaments of gas that make up the cosmic web are thought to connect networks of galaxies across vast voids of nothingness in the universe, according to a CNRS press release. Sometimes they also serve as a source of fresh material for nearby galaxies or black holes, making the web itself even more threadbare and faint.
The French researchers suggest that it’s because these cosmic web filaments are so diffuse, and the signals they give off are so weak, that they went undetected for 20 years even though all the data was in plain sight.
Fresh Eyes
To find the 40 percent of all the visible matter in the universe that they contain, the CNRS researchers took a look at the filaments’ x-ray emissions coupled with information on 15,000 filaments’ physical arrangement.
Through that x-ray analysis, the team was able to confirm that the filaments contained vast amounts of previously-overlooked hot gases — a huge fraction of the universe’s matter hiding in plain sight.
Read more Big Bang Baloney at futurism.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method
Trackback from your site.
Joseph Olson
| #
95% 9f the Universe is composed of math particles and hyperdense equations….or not
In a Dec 14, 1936 interview “Shift on Shift” in Time magazine, the father of big bang said it was a big hoax >
“Mysterious Dr X says, Universe is NOT Expanding” at CanadaFreePress(.)com
Reply
Charles Higley
| #
Several years ago a couple of graduate student astronomers excitedly reported that they had detected ted huge amounts of cold matter (emitting little radiation) in galaxies they looked at. They were told to sit down and shut up or get out. You are only allowed to see what they want you to see to be a successful astronomer. It’s very sad.
Over the years, I have always wondered how they could pretend that all matter is easily visible, which means that it must be hot. With Cold Real Matter, who needs Dark Matter? And with electromagnetism being 10^34 times stronger than gravity, it is easy to conjecture that gravity is a residual, London dispersion force effect between bodies. Note, you cannot have matter without charge, and the amount of charge is directly proportional to the amount of matter, but no one has ever shown that EM effects at scale do not exist.
We have been able to levitate object, neutral objects in strong magnetic field, with no damage to frogs and such. I want to see this shown not to be real before accepting Dark Matter and Dark Physics.
Reply
Dean Michael Jackson
| #
“Claim To Finding Missing Part Of Universe? Big Bang Baloney!”
Atheists self-identify whenever they object to the ‘Big Bang Theory’, and do so object for the simple reason that the so-called theory proves the existence of God’s creation of the universe from nothing.
In fact, ‘missing matter’ is far more numerous than currently known…matter is obstructed from view by matter itself — every star in the sky obstructs ‘missing’ matter, and that ‘missing’ matter itself obstructs ‘missing’ matter, and so on. Therefore we assess the universe as infinite, it has no boundaries, just as time and gravity have no boundaries.
“The physical realm cannot have a boundary, for to have a boundary negates the possibility of a physical realm.” — Dean Michael Jackson (2020)
At my blog, read the articles…
‘House of Cards: The Collapse of the ‘Collapse’ of the USSR’
‘Playing Hide And Seek In Yugoslavia’
Then read the article, ‘The Marxist Co-Option Of History And The Use Of The Scissors Strategy To Manipulate History Towards The Goal Of Marxist Liberation’
Solution
The West will form new political parties where candidates are vetted for Marxist ideology/blackmail, the use of the polygraph to be an important tool for such vetting. Then the West can finally liberate the globe of vanguard Communism.
My blog…
https://djdnotice.blogspot.com/2018/09/d-notice-articles-article-55-7418.html
Reply
JaKo
| #
Well, at least in my mind, this is an exceedingly difficult step: To create something out of nothing. If that is the criterion of me being godless — so be it. OTOH, there’s an inherent fallacy in this something out of nothing — if there is a God or gods, they can’t really hide in the process of creation and therefore, there is no process possible to isolate the God from Nothing. Here you go Mr. DMJ
I think there is a Universe, infinite and ever-lasting. Any “big or small bang” are all very localized phenomena and as much of all the forces — gravity may be the weakest of them all, is it ever present EVERYWHERE! BTW, from the original Newton’s formula — gravity is proportional to the acceleration of nothingness (simply analyse the units;-)
Cheers, JaKo.
Reply
Dean Michael Jackson
| #
” if there is a God or gods”
Three Empirical Proofs For God’s Existence
Proof One
PART I
(1) To discover means that which is discovered already existed; it was merely discovered by man, though it existed before its discovery; (2) true/fact means there is cognition; therefore (3a) since the makeup of the empirically known universe was discovered by man to be true/fact, therefore the makeup of the empirically known universe was also true/fact even before corporeal life existed; therefore we know (3b) there was a cognitive entity that knew the makeup of the universe was true/fact before corporeal life existed.
When man discovered the true/factual nature of the universe, that discovery was also true/factual before man made that discovery. So who knew the true/factual nature of the universe before even corporeal life knew it was true/factual?
PART II
The proof that this cognitive entity, that existed before corporeal life existed in the universe, is God:
Part I informs us that there exists a non-corporeal cognitive entity that always knew the infinite and complex quantum truths/facts underlying the universe. Since this cognitive entity has always been aware of the minute complex realities of the quantum universe without having to think about them, we therefore have discovered God.
Proof Two
The Law of Beginning
All things in the physical realm have a beginning, therefore the physical realm itself had a beginning, otherwise the physical realm’s existence is arbitrary, but the physical realm can’t be arbitrary, therefore our attention is directed to the beginning of the physical realm, a beginning that can only be the result of a cognitive entity existing outside the physical realm.
Proof Three
Let There Be Light
If the physical realm always existed, then the physical realm would now be a dark entity, therefore our attention is directed to the beginning of the physical realm, a beginning that can only be the result of a cognitive entity existing outside the physical realm.
Reply
Robert Beatty
| #
These findings seem to assume that gravity is constant throughout the universe, as defined by Newton’s universal constant for gravity G. The “missing baryon problem” is required to explain the gravitational patterns in space. This explanation shows the force of gravity needs to be a lot stronger than the universal constant shows.
However, if gravity is not constant throughout space the problem disappears, or at least changes significantly. IMO it would be very surprising if gravity is constant outside of the solar system. It may be much weaker than electromagnetism here on earth, but astronomical observations show it is much stronger in the region of black holes for example. Until we can determine how gravity varies in space, we will be unable to fully explain the motion of the galaxies.
Reply
Brian James
| #
Aug 15, 2019 Try Believing in Evolution After This!
Is evolution scientific? Can it be proven? This isn’t your typical dry treatise on the subject. It is flavored with lots of humor, beautiful photography, and good old fashioned common sense. Evolutionary believers themselves will show you how unintelligent this theory really is.
https://youtu.be/g1pVt623_6w
Reply