Even CDC Now Admits No ‘Gold Standard’ of COVID19 Virus Isolate
Damning CDC document confirms Principia Scientific International claims that there has NEVER been any successful laboratory test to isolate and confirm the existence of the SARS-COV2 virus, alleged to have caused the COVID19 pandemic. In effect, the science tells us there is NO virus!
This week, former CBS Healthwatch reporter and author of The Matrix Revealed Jon Rappaport obtained the smoking gun from a telling document from the Center for Disease Control which admitted as much.
In one of their own documents they state quite clearly:
“Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA…”
As Rappoport says,
“Since that is the case, that there are no quantified virus isolates, how can one be sure of what is being determined as COVID-19 is, in fact, COVID-19?”
Principia Scientific International has led the way with this line of argument against the insane and unscientific lockdown policies which have effectively crippled the world economy.
Since the summer our own expert, Saeed Qureshi PhD published three damning articles (links below) exposing this missing key part of the science. Dr Qureshi, a leading laboratory standards and testing expert who worked for Health Canada for many years, consistently argued on this key issue.
Dr Qureshi‘s main point being that, if no one has isolated and proven the existence of any such novel coronavirus as a unique pathogen, how on earth can any pharmaceutical company provide a vaccine?
Or is it a mythical virus that needs a mythical (but expensive!) vaccine to destroy it?
As Voltaire once warned us:
“Those who can make you believe in absurdities can make you commit atrocities.”
Rappoport’s excellent article offering proof from the CDC that Dr Qureshi was correct all along, reads as follows:
“The CDC document is titled, “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel.” It is dated July 13, 2020.Buried deep in the document, on page 39, in a section titled, “Performance Characteristics,” we have this: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA…”
The key phrase there is: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available…”
Every object that exists can be quantified, which is to say, measured. The use of the term “quantified” in that phrase means: the CDC has no measurable amount of the virus, because it is unavailable. THE CDC HAS NO VIRUS.
A further tip-off is the use of the word ‘isolates.” This means NO ISOLATED VIRUS IS AVAILABLE.
Another way to put it:
NO ONE HAS AN ISOLATED SPECIMEN OF THE COVID-19 VIRUS.
NO ONE HAS ISOLATED THE COVID-19 VIRUS.
THEREFORE, NO ONE HAS PROVED THAT IT EXISTS.
As if this were not enough of a revelation to shock the world, the CDC goes on to say they are presenting a diagnostic PCR test to detect the virus-that-hasn’t-been-isolated…and the test is looking for RNA which is PRESUMED to come from the virus that hasn’t been proved to exist.
And using this test, the CDC and every other public health agency in the world are counting COVID cases and deaths…and governments have instituted lockdowns and economic devastation using those case and death numbers as justification.
If people believe “you have the virus but it is not available,” and you have the virus except it is buried within other material and hasn’t been extracted and purified and isolated, these people believe the moon is made of green cheese.
This is like saying. “We have the 20 trillion dollars, they are contained somewhere in our myriad accounts, we just don’t know where.” If you don’t know where, you don’t know you have the money.
“The car keys are somewhere in the house. We just don’t where.” Really? If you don’t know where, you don’t know the keys are in the house.
“The missing cruise missile is somewhere in the arsenal, we just don’t where.” No. If you don’t know where, you don’t know the missile is in the arsenal.
“The COVID-19 virus is somewhere in the material we have—we just haven’t removed it from that material. But we know what it is and we’ve identified it and we know its structure.” NO YOU DON’T. YOU ASSUME THAT.
Science is not assumptions.
“But…but…there is a study which says a few researchers in a lab isolated the virus…”
They say they did. But in July, the CDC is saying no virus is available. I guess that means trucks were not available to bring the virus from that lab to the CDC. The trucks were out of gas. It was raining. The bridge was washed out. The trucks were in the shop. Joe, the driver, couldn’t find his mask, and he didn’t want to leave home without it…
Science is not assumptions.The pandemic is a fraud, down to the root of the poisonous tree.”
We encourage readers to get a fuller insight into the monumental fraud played upon us from the expert scientific analysis provided by Saeed Qureshi in three excellent articles here:
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
About the author: John O’Sullivan John is CEO and co-founder (with Dr Tim Ball) of Principia Scientific International (PSI). John is a seasoned science writer and legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann in the ‘science trial of the century‘. O’Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘Slayers’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world’s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book.
****
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Trackback from your site.
Dean Michael Jackson
| #
“Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA…”
Reply
Dean Michael Jackson
| #
“Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA…”
No, the RNA nucleotide sequences weren’t detected because no software program can ‘see’/detect anything, other than the green fluorescent dye used in the PCR non-test…
No software-based test can identify a sequence of DNA nucleotides…
https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/Nucleotide
…as belonging to any particular pathogen, as inadvertently admitted by software programs (FASTA and BLAST being two such widely used software programs)…
https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi
…that search for similarities…
https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi
…when running a Query and Database Sequence
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1734/
….searching for a match between a database of billions of nucleotide sequences with that of the target nucleotide sequence being amplified. Similarity[1] informs us the target nucleotide can’t be identified (‘seen’) by the software, otherwise there would be a precise match with the database nucleotide sequences.
What the PCR non-test is actually identifying are the numbers of nucleotide sequences amplified in green dye. When amplification is, let’s say, 20x the software gives a negative result because it can’t detect the green-dye. When amplification is increased to 35x the PCR non-test will give a positive result approximately 5% of the time because it can detect the green dye. At 50x amplification the PCR non-test will give an 75% positivity rate. When amplification is increased to 60x, the PCR non-test gives 100% positivity.
https://principia-scientific.com/ny-times-nine-out-of-ten-covid19-tests-are-wrong/
What the PCR non-test is actually identifying is the green dye(!):
“SYBR® Green I is a commonly used fluorescent dye that binds double-stranded DNA molecules by intercalating between the DNA bases. It is used in quantitative PCR because the fluorescence can be measured at the end of each amplification cycle to determine, relatively or absolutely, how much DNA has been amplified.”
https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/life-science/molecular-biology/pcr/quantitative-pcr/sybr-green-based-qpcr.html#:~:text=SYBR%C2%AE%20Green%20I%20is,much%20DNA%20has%20been%20amplified.
Without the green fluorescent dye, the PCR non-test is incapable of even ‘seeing’/detecting the billions of nucleotide sequences created, let alone ‘see’/detect a particular target nucleotide sequence to determine if similarities exist between the target nucleotide sequence and the databank nucleotide sequences. If the green fluorescent dye is removed from the PCR non-test, the result of the non-test will show 0% positivity 100% of the time!
At my blog, read the articles…
‘House of Cards: The Collapse of the ‘Collapse’ of the USSR’
‘Playing Hide And Seek In Yugoslavia’
Then read the article, ‘The Marxist Co-Option Of History And The Use Of The Scissors Strategy To Manipulate History Towards The Goal Of Marxist Liberation’
Solution
The West will form new political parties where candidates are vetted for Marxist ideology/blackmail, the use of the polygraph to be an important tool for such vetting. Then the West can finally liberate the globe of vanguard Communism.
My blog…
https://djdnotice.blogspot.com/2018/09/d-notice-articles-article-55-7418.html
[1] Imagine criminal forensic science requiring only similarities for fingerprint identification! Yeah, just as with the false positive laden PCR test, 100% of the nation would be guilty of a crime every time a fingerprint check was run! Or how about forensic DNA matching requiring only similarities! Imagine running a forensic ballistic test and only looking for similarities in bullet striations! Now one can fully appreciate the fraud behind the PCR non-test.
Reply
Joseph Olson
| #
“Operation Warp Speed using CIA Contractor to keep Covid-19 Vaccine Contracts Secret” by Whitney Webb at LastAmericanVagabond(.)com
No conflicts of interest, or insider trading investigations if Advanced Technology International front company can rinse funds and avoid all FOIA requests
Reply
Tom O
| #
This article tends to say something different from this article on RT whose headline says – “Money laundering time? Covid-19 can survive on CASH for 28 days, study claims.”
The article is from an Australian researcher that has found that SARS-CoV-2 can stay alive on bank notes and touch screen surfaces for up to 30 days. I chuckled when I read that knowing that since no one knows what SARS-CoV-2 is or even IF it is, HOW would they know? But I am sure that research will help the Australian governments continue to move their population back to their original colonial status.
Reply
Dean Michael Jackson
| #
No software-based test can identify a sequence of DNA nucleotides…
https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/Nucleotide
…as belonging to any particular pathogen, as inadvertently admitted by software programs (FASTA and BLAST being two such widely used software programs)…
https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi
…that search for similarities…
https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi
…when running a Query and Database Sequence
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1734/
….searching for a match between a database of billions of nucleotide sequences with that of the target nucleotide sequence being amplified. Similarity[1] informs us the target nucleotide can’t be identified (‘seen’) by the software, otherwise there would be a precise match with the database nucleotide sequences.
What the PCR non-test is actually identifying are the numbers of nucleotide sequences amplified in green dye. When amplification is, let’s say, 20x the software gives a negative result because it can’t detect the green-dye. When amplification is increased to 35x the PCR non-test will give a positive result approximately 5% of the time because it can detect the green dye. At 50x amplification the PCR non-test will give an 75% positivity rate. When amplification is increased to 60x, the PCR non-test gives 100% positivity.
https://principia-scientific.com/ny-times-nine-out-of-ten-covid19-tests-are-wrong/
What the PCR non-test is actually identifying is the green dye(!):
“SYBR® Green I is a commonly used fluorescent dye that binds double-stranded DNA molecules by intercalating between the DNA bases. It is used in quantitative PCR because the fluorescence can be measured at the end of each amplification cycle to determine, relatively or absolutely, how much DNA has been amplified.”
https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/life-science/molecular-biology/pcr/quantitative-pcr/sybr-green-based-qpcr.html#:~:text=SYBR%C2%AE%20Green%20I%20is,much%20DNA%20has%20been%20amplified.
Without the green fluorescent dye, the PCR non-test is incapable of even ‘seeing’/detecting the billions of nucleotide sequences created, let alone ‘see’/detect a particular target nucleotide sequence to determine if similarities exist between the target nucleotide sequence and the databank nucleotide sequences. If the green fluorescent dye is removed from the PCR non-test, the result of the non-test will show 0% positivity 100% of the time!
At my blog, read the articles…
‘House of Cards: The Collapse of the ‘Collapse’ of the USSR’
‘Playing Hide And Seek In Yugoslavia’
Then read the article, ‘The Marxist Co-Option Of History And The Use Of The Scissors Strategy To Manipulate History Towards The Goal Of Marxist Liberation’
Solution
The West will form new political parties where candidates are vetted for Marxist ideology/blackmail, the use of the polygraph to be an important tool for such vetting. Then the West can finally liberate the globe of vanguard Communism.
My blog…
https://djdnotice.blogspot.com/2018/09/d-notice-articles-article-55-7418.html
[1] Imagine criminal forensic science requiring only similarities for fingerprint identification! Yeah, just as with the false positive laden PCR test, 100% of the nation would be guilty of a crime every time a fingerprint check was run! Or how about forensic DNA matching requiring only similarities! Imagine running a forensic ballistic test and only looking for similarities in bullet striations! Now one can fully appreciate the fraud behind the PCR non-test.
Reply
Andy Rowlands
| #
Excellent article John. The mainstream media will totally ignore it, and social media will call it false information.
Reply
Tom
| #
Just found this article, can someone comment please.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/coronavirus-covid-19-virus-isolate-canada-scientists-mutations-strains-a9399226.html
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
The article appears more like a news article than a scientific one. What it appears to describe, based on described assumptions and perceptions, how viruses are being studied. People should try to understand that declaring and/or monitoring pandemic requires monitoring and measuring of the specific virus (in this case, SARS-COV2) in healthy and sick people. This is purely an analytical chemistry subject and not that of medical, virology and/or epidemiology which are the users of the testing or the science of analytical chemistry.
The science of analytical chemistry dictates that the method must be validated for measuring the virus. To develop a valid method one requires a sample of the virus, in sufficient quantities, which at present is not available; hence one cannot have a valid virus test. Therefore, claims of testing for virus at present are simply scientifically invalid. Hope this answer the question. Let me know if you require further detail.
Reply
Dr. John H
| #
Just wondering if any viruses have ever been isolated? Or is it just SARS-COV-2 that hasn’t been isolated?
Reply
Amanda
| #
Here’s a must watch video with German-American lawyer, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, who outlines the scientific fraud involved with covid testing and outlines the crimes against humanity.
Video: “Crimes Against Humanity”: The German Corona Investigation. “The PCR Pandemic”
Full Transcript – https://www.globalresearch.ca/video-crimes-against-humanity-the-german-corona-investigation/5725795
Their conclusions are the following:
The corona crisis must be renamed the “Corona Scandal”
It is:
The biggest tort case ever
The greatest crime against humanity ever committed
Those responsible must be:
Criminally prosecuted for crimes against humanity
Sued for civil damages
Deaths
There is no excess mortality in any country
Corona virus mortality equals seasonal flu
94% of deaths in Bergamo were caused by transferring sick patients to nursing homes where they infected old people with weak immune systems
Doctors and hospitals worldwide were paid to declare deceased victims of Covid-19
Autopsies showed:
Fatalities almost all caused by serious pre-existing conditions
Almost all deaths were very old people
Sweden (no lockdown) and Britain (strict lockdown) have comparable disease and mortality statistics
US states with and without lockdowns have comparable disease and mortality statistics
Health
Hospitals remain empty and some face bankruptcy
Populations have T-cell immunity from previous influenza waves
Herd immunity needs only 15-25% population infection and is already achieved
Only when a person has symptoms can an infection be contagious
Tests:
Many scientists call this a PCR-test pandemic, not a corona pandemic
Very healthy and non-infectious people may test positive
Likelihood of false-positives is 89-94% or near certainty
Prof. Drosten developed his PCR test from an old SARS virus without ever having seen the real Wuhan virus from China
The PCR test is not based on scientific facts with respect to infections
PCR tests are useless for the detection of infections
A positive PCR test does not mean an infection is present or that an intact virus has been found
Amplification of samples over 35 cycles is unreliable but WHO recommended 45 cycles
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
Considering today’s traffic on my blog, this posting appears to have generated significant increase in interest of my views. However, unfortunately, this may have triggered LinkedIn’s today’s action of blocking my account. Therefore, I will only be contributing through my blog http://www.drug-dissolution-testing.com. Please visit the blog often for current and accurate scientific information on the subject. Please send your queries as usual to [email protected]. Thanks
Reply
John O'Sullivan
| #
Saeed, Sorry to read you’ve also been banned from LinkedIn for exposing the truth. We wear these bans as a badge of honor for playing our part in the growing digital army fighting to save science and medicine from the psychopaths who run the world’s major institutions.
Reply
Dipl. Biol. Wolfgang Seidel-Guyenot
| #
Could it possibly have been the Bacterium Sterptococcus pneumoniae, which had been detected by the test? I know that there had been always unspecific hybridizations with genetic material from that Bacterium all the time in the Corman-Drosten qRT-PCR-test.
Reply
MattH
| #
Presumption being “streptococcus ” is the blighter being referred to?
Reply
Shane
| #
Can you provide a source for the detection of Streptococcus as a false positive for C ov19 ?
Reply
Heather
| #
I’m not a scientist, so what does this part mean?
“…assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA…”
What are “characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA”? What is this RNA from? Thank you.
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
I am a chemist with a Ph.D. degree in chemistry and worked for 30 years in pharmaceutical science area as a research scientist. To me, it seems like they are trying to describe/explain a chemical reaction/process (polymerization) with a poor background/training in chemistry.
However, from the way it is explained one thing is for sure, it (the explanation or the process) cannot be linked to the virus (SARS-Cov2) and its infection/disease (COVID-19). Science (chemistry) dictates that working for virus and/or disease requires a virus itself, isolated, characterized, validated and quantified independently which has NOT been done yet. Hence everything in this regard, becomes a story.
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
The testing for the “cases” should immediately be stopped and a need for better and relevant science and scientists for the future (http://www.drug-dissolution-testing.com/?p=3519)
Reply
Leijona
| #
I don’t know much about it, but I would like to ask, if the virus has not been isolated then what about these articles?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045880/
https://mra.asm.org/content/9/11/e00169-20/
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
There are differences in terminology which is causing confusion.
The term isolate is used to describe some sort of mixture or soup of inoculated cell culture with nasal swab ASSUMING that swab contains virus (SARS-CoV2) further ASSUMING patient which provided the swab has COVID. Following pretty extensive chemical manipulation with the culture somehow sequence of some components is determined and related to sequence available in gene data base (not of actual SARS-COV2) and ASSUMED that ISOLATE has or contains the VIRUS.
On the other hand, in reality what is needed (and is fact often incorrectly described) that virus has been isolated. Note the wordings and their difference i.e. virus isolate vs isolated virus. For studying the virus and/or its associated disease, one requires isolated virus – physical sample of well characterized and quantifiable which is not available. Hope this will help.
Reply
Don Westrope
| #
Cannot find the actual CDC article. Can you offer a citation? thnx
Reply
Dean Michael Jackson
| #
Real-time PCR handbook
For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures.
https://www.gene-quantification.de/real-time-pcr-handbook-life-technologies-update-flr.pdf
“DNA polymerase
PCR performance is often related to the thermostable DNA
polymerase, so enzyme selection is critical to success.
One of the main factors affecting PCR specificity is the
fact that Taq DNA polymerase has residual activity at low
temperatures. Primers can anneal nonspecifically to
DNA, allowing the polymerase to synthesize nonspecific
product. The problem of nonspecific products resulting
from mis-priming can be minimized by using a “hot-start”
enzyme. Using a hot-start enzyme ensures that no active
DNA polymerase is active during reaction setup and the
initial DNA denaturation step.”
Hmm…I’m sure the patient will be glad to hear that his/her diagnosis was arrived at with “minimized” error, instead of 100% error free when a blood culture is taken and analyzed through an electron microscope!
Oh…and what’s this:
“5′ nuclease assay specificity
Assay specificity is the degree that the assay includes
signal from the target and excludes signal from non-target
in the results. Specificity is arguably the most important
aspect of any assay. The greatest threat to assay specificity
for 5′ nuclease assays is homologs. Homologs are genes
similar in sequence to that of the target, but they are not
the intended target of the assay. Homologs are extremely
common within species and across related species.”
Similar? You mean I’ll be misdiagnosed and possibly murdered by my doctor?! That’s right; any physician that uses the PCR to intentionally misdiagnose wants to kill you, obviously!
“5′ nuclease assays offer two tools for specificity: primers
and probes. For maximal impact on specificity by primers,
a mismatch between the target and homolog must be
positioned at the 3′ -most base of the primer. A mismatch
further away from the 3’ end may have little to no impact
on specificity. In contrast, mismatches across most of the
length of a MGB probe, which is shorter than a TaqMan®
probe, can have a strong impact on specificity—TaqMan®
MGB probes are stronger tools for specificity than primers.
For example, a one- or two-base random mismatch in
the primer binding site will very likely allow the DNA
polymerase to extend the primer bound to the homolog
with high efficiency. A one or two base extension by DNA
polymerase will stabilize the primer bound to the homolog,
so it is just as stably bound as primer bound to the intended,
fully complementary target. At that point, there is nothing
to prevent the DNA polymerase from continuing synthesis
to produce a copy of the homolog.”
You’re dead, ladies and gentlemen!
Obviously our institutions were long ago co-opted by Satanists (who use deluded Marxists as foot soldiers), and they’ve done us the favor of self-identification, due to the panic caused by this researcher:
“Trust but VERIFY” – President Ronald Reagan’s watch phrase when dealing with the USSR…
(1) The West conspired to not VERIFY the ‘collapse’ of the USSR, even though the survival of the West depended on verification should the ‘collapse’ be a ruse, which proves (1) there was no ‘collapse’ of the USSR, because if there had been a ‘collapse’ the West would have immediately VERIFIED the ‘collapse’; and (2) the West’s institutions were co-opted by Marxists, explaining the West’s enabling of the fake ‘collapse’ of the USSR…quod erat demonstrandum.
(2) Throughout the 1980s the West conspired to regurgitate Soviet Bloc under counting of communist party membership numbers in order to facilitate the canard of imploding Soviet Bloc political establishments, explaining the West’s enabling of the fake ‘collapse’ of the USSR…quod erat demonstrandum.
(3) Before any religious sectarian strife in Yugoslavia (1991 – 2001) first there would have been massive reprisals against the reviled Communists who implemented draconian discriminatory policies to wipe out religion in Yugoslavia. LCY anti-religious discriminatory policies were so effective that within fifty years those who were without a religion increased by an astronomical 3,100%! The fact that no reprisals took place against LCY members proves that the ‘religious strife’ and ‘breakup’ of Yugoslavia was manufactured and controlled by the Communists.
(4) The World War I Allies never did immediately send a naval expedition to Petrograd to easily topple Lenin & Bolshevik’s November 7, 1917 coup, thereby promptly returning Russia to the war, Russia’s involvement in the war being a critical variable for the Allies’ victory strategy against the Central Powers, proving (a) that the Allies knew they were going to win the war; (b) that the war was set up to (i) weaken the West’s influence in the world; (ii) weaken the West’s people’s confidence in their institutions and what those institutions stood for; and (c) one objective of the war was to settle into power the first above board Marxist state, with more to follow. In fact, there already was an anti-Marxist force in Russia at the time that if ordered would have conquered all of Bolshevik Russia during this period when the Bolsheviks were very weak. The unit was the 60,000 strong Czechoslovak Legion (soon to be 100,000 strong) but instead of sending the legion 700 miles north to Petrograd, the Allies sent it on a 6,000 mile odyssey across Russia to Vladivostok for evacuation to Europe(!), once again proving the Allies knew they were going to win the war…that the war was a Marxist operation.[1]
(5) “On the initiative of the KGB, an army of Soviet vigilantes five million strong, the so-called ‘druzhiny’, was recruited from among the Komsomol activists. Their units were led by retired Chekists. They have been patrolling and policing the streets of all the Soviet cities. Their primary task has been to prepare the Soviet people to ‘behave’ during the forthcoming ‘liberalisation’.” – KGB defector Major Anatoliy Golitsyn, ‘The Perestroika Deception‘, March 1989, pp. 14-15.
(6) Leningrad Oblast (Province) is still named Leningrad Oblast! Engels City is still named Engels City! Engels Air Force Base is still named Engels Air Force Base! Russian military personnel still refer to each other as “Comrade”! Kaliningrad Oblast is still named Kaliningrad Oblast! The State Emblem of the Soviet Union is atop the Duma building, and illuminated at night for clear viewing! Soviet Red Stars are still attached to the bows of Russian naval ships! The Hammer & Sickle logo is still on Aeroflot commercial aircraft! Not one statue to Lenin has been destroyed in Russia, where out of the 3,000 still standing throughout Russia, only a handful have been carefully taken down (in locations where tourists frequent) and hidden away in parks and museums, the remainder of these monstrosities to Russian nationalism/Russian Orthodox Church rubbing historical salt into still open wounds of Russian nationalists! The Russian ‘electorate’ are only ‘electing’ for president Soviet era communist party member Quislings, who persecuted the 85% of the religious population held captive by the Communist Party during the ‘Soviet era’!
At my blog, read the articles…
‘House of Cards: The Collapse of the ‘Collapse’ of the USSR’
‘Playing Hide And Seek In Yugoslavia’
Then read the article, ‘The Marxist Co-Option Of History And The Use Of The Scissors Strategy To Manipulate History Towards The Goal Of Marxist Liberation’
Solution
The West will form new political parties where candidates are vetted for Marxist ideology/blackmail, the use of the polygraph to be an important tool for such vetting. Then the West can finally liberate the globe of vanguard Communism.
My blog…
https://djdnotice.blogspot.com/2018/09/d-notice-articles-article-55-7418.html
[1] Even more telling is neutral Denmark’s laying mines off its coastal waters in international waterways in August, 1914 [thereby violating the 1857 treaty opening the Danish Straits to all shipping, where, “No ship of any kind may, under any pretext whatsoever, be subjected to detention or obstruction at the passage of the Sound or the Belts”] at the prompting of Germany (Germany too lays mines in the Danish Straits) and Great Britain does nothing! Not a word from the Allies (and the usual deafening silence from the Marxist co-opted press), in fact, even though access to the Baltic Sea is critical for the Allies to roll up Germany quickly by (a) closing the Baltic Sea to all German surface/subsurface vessels; (b) denying German access to trade with Sweden; (c) bringing the Royal Navy and the Imperial Russian Navy together; (d) forcing Germany to relocate critically needed infantry divisions and heavy armaments away from the Western Front for the new Baltic Front; (e) allowing British and Russian troop landings across the Baltic coasts, preventing German forces from moving eastwards towards Russia; thereby (f) knocking Germany out of the war before one shot is fired.
Reply