President of World Academy of Bio Med Sciences: ‘COVID-19 is Bioweapon’
Professor Giuseppe Tritto (pictured), an international expert in biotechnology and nanotechnology who serves as president of the World Academy of Biomedical Sciences and Technologies (WABT), believes that COVID-19 was created in a laboratory as a bioweapon.
Prof. Tritto wrote in his new book, COVID 19: La Chimera che ha cambiato il Mondo (China COVID 19: The chimera that changed the world), that it is obvious COVID-19 was genetically engineered in the infamous Wuhan Institute of Virology’s P4 laboratory with help from France and the U.S. through the use of “reverse genetics.”
He also noted that program director Dr. Shi Zhengli was encouraged by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to create bioweapons. Prof. Tritto also explained how Dr. Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) subsidized the deadly research with grant money.
“Providing the matrix virus would have meant admitting that COVID-19 was created in the laboratory. In fact, the incomplete genome made available by China lacks some inserts of AIDS amino acids, which itself is a smoking gun,” Prof. Tritto wrote in his book.
He also noted that COVID-19 is rapidly mutating and finding a workable vaccine to stop the spread of the engineered virus will be difficult as a result.
“Given the many mutations of COVID-19, it is extremely unlikely that a single vaccine that blocks the virus will be found. At the moment 11 different strains have been identified: the A2a genetic line which developed in Europe and the B1 genetic line which took root in North America are more contagious than the 0 strain originating in Wuhan,” Prof. Tritto wrote.
“I therefore believe that, at the most, a multivalent vaccine can be found effective on 4-5 strains and thus able to cover 70-75% of the world’s population,” he added.
What makes Prof. Tritto’s allegations carry so much weight is his leadership role at the WABT, a globalist scientific body that works with the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO).
However, other high-profile individuals have made a similar assessment as Prof. Tritto regarding the origins of COVID-19, as Big League Politics has reported:
Sir Richard Dearlove, who was the former leader of the MI6 secret intelligence service in Britain, has said that he believes COVID-19 was created in a Chinese laboratory.
Dearlove told The Telegraph that he came to his informed conclusion after seeing an “important” new scientific report indicating that the virus was made by man and did not emerge naturally. The study he cited was undertaken by Professor Angus Dalgleish of St George’s Hospital, University of London, and Norwegian virologist Birger Sorensen.
These scientists discovered “inserted sections placed on the Sars-CoV-2 Spike surface,” which allows the virus to more easily invade cells. They also noted that the virus was “significantly different from any Sars we have studied” in their report. Although they stopped short of calling it a deliberate bioweapon, they came to the conclusion that the virus was in fact man made.
Dearlove, who led MI6 from from 1999 until 2004, believes that this news will eventually be used to compel China to pay “reparations” to nations across the world for the damage they have caused with their virus.
“I do not think that this started as an accident,” Dearlove said while appearing on the “Planet Normal” podcast.
“I think it will make every country in the world rethink how it treats its relationship with China,” he added.
The medical establishment, such as the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, does not want this crucial information to be widely understood by the public.
Read more at bigleaguepolitics.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Trackback from your site.
Richard Wakefield
| #
No it was not. The virus’s own genes prove it came from nature. Just shows some “experts” arnt.
https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/claim-by-nobel-laureate-luc-montagnier-that-the-novel-coronavirus-is-man-made-and-contains-genetic-material-from-hiv-is-inaccurate/?fbclid=IwAR2l9A-4EIlvp-W9iPKeOtAScDZyO1wPhRR4fbv96Ij37DX-bM7NaO_owww
Reply
Finn McCool
| #
Richard,
For once I tend to agree with you in that SARS-CoV2 is most likely zoonotic in origin.
That does not preclude the fact that it is possible to manufacture viruses such as this one fairly easily using CRISPR-Cas9. You can build any genetic sequence you like.
Reply
richard
| #
but it has been patented and you cannot patent something from nature- so which is it?
Reply
Richard Wakefield
| #
the virus has been isolated and sequenced in a large number of patients outside of China it’s entire genome is in GenBank.
Reply
chris
| #
Richard Wakefield, who isolated it? So far all asked has had to say that they haven’t isolated it.
Reply
MattH
| #
Here in New Zealand with failed overseas arrival isolation processes we have a resurgence of the virus.
Genetic sequencing is being used to track the source of new infections. One recent positive test was sequenced to identify to have come from the USA.
Most recent positive tests in the Auckland City centered resurgence are genetically sequenced to identify having come from the Australian/English variant.
The one American variant positive test allowed the boffins to identify that the only identifiable contact must have been the newly infected person had used a lift in an isolation facility shortly after a nurse who had had contact with an isolated person infected with the American variant.
Apparently there is a third variant of the virus in New Zealand isolation facilities and as this country went 100 days with zero community infection, only infection from people flying in from overseas, the boffins are using genetic sequencing to identify how infectious contact occurred in an attempt at community elimination of the virus.
It will be interesting in 2 1/2 years time to more clearly see if Sweden enacted the most prudent management regime.
Yo Later.
Reply
Tom O
| #
In many ways, I have come to wonder if “the virus” has mutated at all, or just the 100 and 1 symptoms applied to it has created that impression. Since I, unlike Wakefield, have yet to see where the virus has been isolated, I am guessing that with an incomplete genome, as stated in the article, there are 100s of other viruses that will match up, As for following “strains,” how do you do that if you haven’t got a complete virus to start with? sounds a bit difficult, but in today’s computer simulated world, I suppose anything is possible these days. And I suspect that this “virus,” assuming that there really is one and it isn’t an aberration of the 5G network that was started in Wuhan at same time as CV-19 appeared, and spreads throughout the heavily cell phoned portions of the world, but not so much in those areas where 4G and above don’t exist, didn’t “escape” from the lab there.
Reply
richard
| #
worth a watch of Plandemic . Make of it what you will but of particular note is who is fact checking?
this made me laugh –
posted on face book about Trump- https://www.facebook.com/boknowsthetruth/videos/743176406415604/
When you click on it it comes up with a fact check –
“False information
This post repeats information about COVID-19 that independent fact-checkers say is false”
and yet throughout the short film Covid -19 is not mentioned.
Fact checking is a pile of croc!!! Facebook full on stupid.
Reply