Sign Up: ‘Question Everything’ Conference in Austin, Texas
Free-thinking citizens are cordially invited to sign up to partake in the 2020 ‘Question Everything’ Conference scheduled for Saturday/Sunday, November 7-8, 2020. The event is being hosted at the Hilton Garden Inn Austin Airport, 7610 John Glenn Way, Austin, Texas.
Among the guest speakers will be Joseph A Olson PE, co-founder of Principia Scientific International and co-author of the ground-breaking book, Slaying the Sky Dragon:Death of the Greenhouse Gas Theory.
This event will showcase multimedia presentations of researchers, college professors, and authors who question vitally important topics as is needed to maintain lawful government and moral society:
|
| After the completion of the Question Everything 2020 Conference those who bought a seat ticket will also be issued a comp password for free but limited access to the archived individual presentations and panel discussions. |
2. BUY LIVE STREAM & ARCHIVE TICKETS AT THE FOLLOWING LINK:
https://MixNstream.com/question-everything-ppv.html
| On the first of each month the price of the Live Stream Pay Per View tickets will go up $25 until August
where it will remain steady until the Conference:
|
3. RESERVE A ROOM AT HILTON GARDEN INN FOR THIS EVENT
AT THE FOLLOWING LINK:
To Reserve a Room
for the Question Everything 2020 Conference
at the Hilton Garden Inn
for the Guaranteed Group Rate of $119
click this LINK.
For full details, please visit the web page at mixnstream.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Trackback from your site.
Joseph Olson
| #
We live in a false paradigm reality, bounded by faux science, fake history, filtered news, financed by a fiat currency and directed by demonic warlords. Find and share Truth….it is your duty as an Earthling.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi John and Joe,
This comment will possibly not be popular but I am a scientist and am aware of its actual history. Which, SCIENCE, was first demonstrated by Galileo. While he questioned many generally accepted ideas, he made efforts to find the simple observations which refuted these wrong ideas so there is still no doubt that these previously accepted ideas were absolutely wrong ideas.
I have pointed to actual quality data being measured at William Finley Wildlife Reserve by the NOAA USCRN project which was posted by you (John) October 26, 2018. This data absolutely proves that their measured atmosphere temperature was not (and is not) by their measurement of the surface temperature, is a good proxy for the temperature of the radiating surface of the Earth.
However, neither you or Joe reinforced this observed fact with any comment. If this quality NOAA data does not convince you, who question everything, that the idea of greenhouse effect of atmospheric carbon dioxide, as proposed by Svante Arrhenius, is fundamentally and absolutely wrong, why should I spent any money to come to hear more of your endless and repeated arguments.
Science is based upon observation; not arguments.
Have a good day, Jerry
Reply
John O'Sullivan
| #
Jerry, We proudly provide a platform for scientists who dissent from the consensus and who rely on observed data, as per the empirical method extolled by Karl Popper. You have enjoyed free use of our online platform to share your worthy data analysis with hundreds of thousands of our readers. We have published many of your submissions putting our own valuable time and energy into their editing and presentation not requiring any payment from you. Whether you wish to partake in the conference is your choice but to infer you have somehow been harshly treated by us is galling.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi John,
You wrote: “We proudly provide a platform for scientists who dissent from the consensus and who rely on observed data, as per the empirical method extolled by Karl Popper.” This is true and why I recommend that everyone should visit PSI because you do not censure, to my knowledge, anyone who submits something to you to post. But you also scan and post many, many current reports for PSI reader to access at one website. A valuable service.
But when you and Joe seem to ignore this empirical data by not commenting ‘Amen!!! to it, what is a PSI reader, not familiar with this thing termed SCIENCE, to think? Could this Krause be another ignorant person who doesn’t understand that the knowledge of modern ‘SCIENCE’ is only established by using arguments about what has been learned from the observations of classical physicists.
Because as a chemist I claim to be a scientist I am sensitive to the fact I seldom read: You do not know your chemistry. While, I commonly read: “You do not know your physics.” It seems a forgotten fact that it was the empirical results of the. reproducible, quantitative results of the experiments of alchemists which convinced physicists that matter was composed of atoms. It seems a forgotten fact that a physicist, accidentally discovered some matter emitted something that could pass through opaque matter. And then it was discovered that the atoms of solid opaque gold atoms were mainly empty space. These observations force the development of a new modern physics which we term quantum mechanics (QM). Which physicists have a hard time understanding but chemists do not. For the reasoned results of QM explained the structures of matter which the chemists had already deduct from the empirical results of their experiments. Or even more simply, QM explains how it is that solid water (ice) floats on liquid water, which nearly everyone has observed without questioning how does this occur?
I have generally stopped submitting essays for you to consider because my best efforts have been basically ignored when you did post them. For which I continually thank you.
Galileo did not have my problem. Some people did not ignore his observations and his conclusions based upon these observation. Some people wanted to kill him and occurring to the history which I believe, he lied to save his life so he could write his well-known book. But seldom read book.
Have a good day, Jerry
Reply
John O'Sullivan
| #
Jerry, Please feel free to continue to post comments to help others understand your analysis. Try not to take it personally if others don’t actively acknowledge your writing. I can assure you hundreds of thousands of readers look at these posts every month so you have nothing to lose and everything to gain in persisting.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi John,
Thanks for the encouragement!!!
Have a good day, Jerry
Reply
judy
| #
I am definitely going to come to this conference. I am looking forward to actually meeting many of the familiar names who will be there. I would like to present my work too. It is on the easily provable corruption and faking of data by the Australian bureau of meteorology.
Reply