Another Convert to the Fact there is NO Greenhouse Gas Effect
This video is the first in a series which will outline the scientific reasons why a new null hypothesis of climate change is needed, and what is wrong with the current one, which assumes a 33c surface enhancement from the so-called “Greenhouse Effect” of “Greenhouse Gases”.
[Editor’s note: Robert Holmes PhD was once a self-confessed ‘warmist’ then a ‘lukewarmist’ and now regarded as a ‘Slayer’ of the consensus science radiative greenhouse gas effect. We have pleasure in promoting his excellent short video to better expose this gross error in climate science]
It will be shown that there is another cause of this surface thermal enhancement, and that the so-called “Greenhouse Gases” cannot be responsible for it.
To those who are confused about the conclusions of my papers; (Firstly: The Ideal Gas Law and it’s derivative the molar mass version are correct). They show that for a GHE to occur in an atmosphere, an anomalous change amounting to a factor of 10 more than expected must happen in the gas density, pressure or both.
No anomalous changes have been seen in any planetary atmospheres. This is not really a surprise, since anomalous changes are actually forbidden by the ideal gas law and its derivatives like the molar mass version. To provide more detail; Different concentrations of gases at the same or at different times can provide the same temperature or different temperatures; BUT – the same concentrations of gases cannot provide different temperatures at different times. The formula T = P M / R ρ forbids it.
This fact disproves the greenhouse gas hypothesis, as it is presented by the IPCC – because the IPCC speaks of a 33c thermal enhancement, and also speaks of a long time delay in the warming effect of CO2, i.e. TCR and ECS.
Read more by Robert Holmes PhD at www.researchgate.net
Trackback from your site.
FauxScienceSlayer
| #
“No Loophole for Your Soul” > first use of the term WARMIST following the fake Lindsen-North debates in Houston, Jan 2010
“Non Science Nonsense” > first use of term LUKEWARMIST following fake Mann-Curry debate in Discover magazine, April 2010
The continued hyperbolic hysteria of the Warmists has forced replacement of this polite nickname with the more appropriate term, ALARMISTS. This Chicken Little dogma and it’s related Jack in the Beanstalk “green energy” solutions are exposed, soon to be universally rejected.
Find and share Truth….it is your duty as an Earthling
Reply
Atmospheric Physicist
| #
There is absolutely no warming effect by carbon dioxide or water vapor. Gravity makes the surface temperature what it is, not radiation from the cold atmosphere supposedly causing heat into the already-warmer surface. Greenhouse gases cool the surface according to correct, long-established physics. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT1iFhGKOI8&feature=youtu.be
Reply