It Seems ‘Saving The Planet’ Requires Silencing Dissent
Today marks the start of the COP31 United Nations’ climate summit. Delegates from nearly 200 nations will gather in Antalya, Turkey, for two weeks, to decide how to ‘save the planet’. Again
It also raises the unstated issue of how much national sovereignty member countries are expected to give up.
Robbing Wealthy Nations
The main business in Antalya is money. At COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan, in 2024, nations adopted the “New Collective Quantified Goal,” calling for developed countries to “take the lead” in mobilizing at least $300 billion a year for developing nations by 2035.
The agreement also calls for total climate financing for developing countries to reach $1.3 trillion a year by 2035, from all public and private sources.
COP31 is expected to press for delivery on that goal, along with stronger national emissions pledges under the Paris Agreement.
For taxpayers in wealthy nations, this is an open-ended commitment.
Decisions made by international negotiators would shape domestic spending and energy policy, and elected legislatures would then be asked to pay for promises they did not make.
Can Washington Stay Out?
The United States will be largely absent from that bargaining. The Trump administration formally left the Paris Agreement in January 2026.
That same month, it announced withdrawal from the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), as well as 65 other international bodies.
The exit takes effect February 27, 2027, which would make the United States the first country ever to leave the convention. Washington has also stopped funding the UNFCCC, and sent no delegates to COP30 in Brazil.
Supporters see this as Washington reasserting its right to set its own energy policy. Legal experts are less certain about what comes next.
The Senate ratified the convention unanimously in 1992; if a future president wants to rejoin, it isn’t known whether that would need a new two-thirds Senate vote.
Turkey Squelches Opposition
COP31’s hosting agreement gives attendees a “duty” to not interfere in Turkey’s internal affairs, which certain groups worry will suppress criticism of the host’s human-rights record.
(A similar clause appeared in the agreements for the UAE and Azerbaijan summits, but was dropped for Brazil’s. Amnesty International called this “extremely disappointing” and warned of a “chilling effect” on free expression.)
Turkey has some strident critics. The Times of Israel reports that on October 14, police raided the Istanbul headquarters of Halk TV, one of the country’s few opposition-aligned news channels.
They halted broadcasts, detained 11 people, and installed a government trustee to run the station. Prosecutors cited a corruption probe into the channel’s chairman.
The raid came hours before defense arguments began in the trial of jailed Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu, President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s chief rival.
Additionally, a Human Rights Watch report released October 13 documents arrests, fines, and prosecutions of people protesting mining and deforestation.
In one case, 26-year-old Esra Işık was sentenced to more than two years for “resisting” officials at a protest.
And ahead of the NATO summit in Ankara this past July, Turkish authorities banned protests for 13 days and ordered 225 arrests.
COP31 asks free nations to accept binding financial obligations negotiated abroad, at a conference held by a government that jails activists and seizes newsrooms.
Delegates will talk about ‘saving the planet’ in Antalya, but little is likely to be said about saving free speech.
See more here climatechangedispatch
Header image: Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership