The Kafkaesque ordeal of a leading covid sceptic
When the 2020 coronavirus pandemic hit, thousands of doctors, scientists, academics, lawyers, economists, business leaders and journalists questioned the validity of unprecedented restrictions imposed on us globally
As an insight, and antidote to the fear, a legal expert filmed and recorded dissenting testimonies ignored by politicians.
The result is a vital historical record with experts questioning the science and expressing alternative views to unfolding events.
More than 500 respected contributors explained that PCR tests were fundamentally unreliable; that covid-19 was not a real pandemic and was being exaggerated for political and financial control purposes by the global elite; that covid vaccines could cause catastrophic injury; that we were being conned.
High-profile guests such as Dr Wolfgang Wodarg, a former German MP and doctor, and early pandemic and PCR critic, said lockdowns lacked scientific justification, Professor Dr Sucharit Bhakdi, a retired German microbiologist, explained why government response was disproportionate, and former Pfizer scientist Dr Mike Yeadon spoke candidly about mass testing, school closures and injurious vaccine ‘hot lots’.
We heard Dr Naomi Wolf, author of The Pfizer Papers: Pfizer’s Crimes Against Humanity, say that vaccine passports would be used for social control and surveillance, a digital ID gateway.
Robert F Kennedy Jr, later to be head of US health, said dissenting scientists had been suppressed, and criticised pharma’s influence on healthcare. Nobel prize winner, French virologist Professor Luc Montagnier, now deceased, argued that mass vaccination was driving covid variants and spoke about vaccine induced antibody-dependent enhancement that made covid-19 symptoms worse not better.
All presented their arguments backed by strong evidence.
In June 2021, as guest number 58, I was one of the journalists interviewed. It was not long after AstraZeneca’s vaccine rollout which killed Lucy Taberer, mother of a five-year-old boy. Her family were devastated.
The jab she so desperately wanted should have been her gateway to freedom, instead it took her life.
Our evidence – likened to the Nuremberg trials that exposed the leaders behind Nazi war crimes – was recorded by the Corona Investigative Committee (Corona-Ausschuss) (CIC). This was headed by consumer and litigation attorney Dr Reiner Fuellmich PhD (pictured), with fellow lawyer and co-founder Viviane Fischer.
They were joined by medical law specialists Justus P Hoffmann and Antonia Fischer (no relation to Viviane). Dr Wodarg acted as an adviser and ‘general wise old man’.
The CIC, funded solely by public donations, raised over two million euros so that the team could continue their important work.
In a gruesome twist, Fuellmich was later arrested for donation embezzlement and imprisoned after Viviane Fischer, Antonia Fischer, Hoffman, and associate lawyer Marcel Templin, filed criminal complaints alleging he had diverted €700,000 from the CIC into his personal bank account.
Accuser Viviane Fischer, who diverted €100,000 into her own account, has also been investigated and may face trial proceedings.
These were formally documented loans, signed and approved by Viviane Fischer and Fuellmich, taken, they said, to protect money from potential bank account freezes or seizures. (Canadian truckers lost millions in donations after the Canadian government pressurised fundraising platforms to return money to donors.)
Fuellmich intended to repay his loan after the sale of his €1.4million home but it was alleged the money was used for private purposes rather than being held for the CIC. A court agreed and Fuellmich was convicted of breach of trust.
He has been in prison for nearly three years, but not formally convicted according to German law as his case is pending appeal.
Appeal grounds focus on an alleged illegal arrest. Grounds claim he is a political prisoner not a criminal, that criminal charges were fabricated – a government dossier is cited as evidence.
Grounds also say the loan issue was an internal squabble that could have been resolved given the chance and they allege the judge arbitrarily decided that the legal loan agreements were a cover for illegal activity.
Was Fuellmich set up? We know the German government was worried that his activities were a ‘potential threat’ to Germany’s security. Their dossier says that his activities ‘represent a complex challenge for the security authorities requiring a co-ordinated and multifaceted response.
The initiation of criminal proceedings against Reiner Fuellmich based on the evidence collected must be prepared.
‘Any necessary constructions or legal frameworks should be evaluated, and suitable third-party actors should be recruited as appropriate. The recruitment and use of confidential informants from Reiner Fuellmich’s closest circle is recommended.’
So how did it get to this? In October 2023, Fuellmich, who had moved to Mexico for safety, flew to Tijuana airport where he and his wife Inka had an appointment with the German consul to renew lost passports.
They were met by armed immigration officers and taken to their offices. Fuellmich was told, ‘You have no problems here, but you have problems in Germany. Go back, sort them out then you’re welcome back here.’
He and Inka were separated; she was locked in a cell overnight and he was flown to Mexico City where he was locked in a cell. The following day, he was flown to Frankfurt where he was arrested.
With no extradition or deportation order, Fuellmich was then essentially abducted, his legal team claim, acting on orders from the German embassy, it is alleged.
For six months after his arrest, Fuellmich was held in solitary confinement, taken to court wearing hand and leg cuffs, highly unusual for a non-violent detainee. The reason given for solitary was to prevent him providing inmates with legal advice.
He was never offered bail, considered a flight risk, and authorities felt he would obstruct their investigation or collude with witnesses.
Compare his treatment with that of Uli Hoeness, former president of Bayern Munich football club, sentenced to three and a half years for a €28.5million tax fraud. Hoeness began his sentence on June 2, 2014.
After seven months, he was granted day release allowing him to work during the day and return to prison in the evening. After just 21 months, halfway through his sentence, he was freed. Most prisoners must serve two-thirds of their sentence before parole is considered.
Fuellmich describes solitary as a ‘dehumanising’ experience. In a recent interview he said:
‘They use pre-trial detention to break you, so that you can’t defend yourself. I’m strong and won’t be broken. My mother died while I’ve been in prison. I wasn’t allowed to go to her funeral or visit her while she was dying, but I refuse to cry.
I’m saving that for when I get out. It’s important not to show any weakness in here. I’m traumatised to a certain degree but I’m pretty resilient, so I will recover.’
He says that the hundreds of cards and letters he receives now his communication rights have been restored, and the efforts to raise awareness of his circumstances by others, have kept him strong. As have some ‘solid’ inmates with whom he can enjoy a laugh.
He said:
‘I feel that I am once again a real person because if you can’t communicate, you’re not really a real person.’
He has no regrets and says that the populace is in a ‘divide and conquer situation’ being ‘driven against each other’ as a way of control. He is confident this will not happen. ‘We will not step back,’ he said. ‘We will keep going. Nobody can keep us from getting out the whole truth.’
He describes the perpetrators of the ‘plandemic’ as ‘monsters who have no empathy’.
Fuellmich believes his appeal will be successful and he will soon be free. He has the support of the Trump administration and of Health and Human Services secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr.
Last month, he was visited by Leland Lehrman, a Trump administration representative from RFK Jr’s department. Fuellmich said if he is released, they will make sure he is flown to safety.
Summing up the feelings of all those who spoke to the CIC and those who feel something is just not right in the world he said:
‘There are millions of us questioning the narrative. We are the many not the few. Together we are strong and together we will get justice.’
See more here conservativewoman.co.uk
Header image: Medika Life