The Mystery of Transplanted Consciousness

When organ transplantation first became possible, doctors celebrated it as one of medicine’s greatest achievements—literally giving someone the gift of life through another’s ultimate sacrifice
But what nobody anticipated was that along with functional organs, something far more mysterious might also transfer: aspects of the donor’s consciousness, personality, memories, and even skills.
The evidence for this phenomenon has been accumulating for decades, yet mainstream medicine largely ignores it because it challenges fundamental assumptions about where consciousness comes from.
If memories and personality traits can be stored in organs rather than just the brain, this would completely revolutionize our understanding of human consciousness.
The Reality of Living with Transplants
While transplants are called “medical miracles,” they’re far from perfect. The failure rates tell a sobering story:
• Lung: 10.4% within a year, 72% within 10 years
• Heart: 7.8% within a year, 46% within 10 years
• Kidney: 5% within a year, 46.4% within 10 years
• Liver: 7.6% within a year, 32.5% within 10 years.
Given these risks, patients must follow incredibly strict regimens: taking immune-suppressing medications costing $10,000-30,000 annually, permanently avoiding alcohol and drugs, constant bloodwork monitoring, and doing everything possible to avoid infections.
The immune-suppressing medications have side effects ranging from mild tremors and headaches to serious infections, kidney damage, and metabolic disturbances. Corticosteroids used in transplant management have even more extensive side effects.
The vaccination requirements became controversial during COVID-19 when people were denied transplants for refusing COVID vaccines (and in some cases were severely injured when they finally submitted to vaccination).
What frustrated me most was that nobody mentioned the COVID vaccine could actually increase transplant rejection risk by provoking autoimmunity or that numerous publications have now corroborated this link.
Note: DMSO has been shown to prevent rejection of certain grafts like skin grafts and insulin producing cells, and likely would help transplanted organs, but this hasn’t been tested.
One reader for example shared:
I took care of a patient who had a kidney transplant nine years ago then got his Covid shot and had spontaneous organ rejection and needed the kidney removed. From what other nurses told me, it is happening more and more often.
But beyond these medical challenges, transplant patients face something even stranger—significant psychiatric changes that suggest something profound is being transferred along with the organs.
The Heart’s Secret Code
Dr. Benjamin Bunzel at the University Hospital in Vienna studied 47 heart transplant patients and found that while 79 percent claimed their personality hadn’t changed (though showed signs otherwise), six percent reported distinct personality changes they attributed directly to their new hearts.
These individuals felt compelled to accommodate what they sensed as their donor’s memories.
When studied more extensively, approximately 10 percent of heart transplant recipients reported experiencing emotions they believed came from their donor.
Claire Sylvia’s Transformation
The most documented case comes from Claire Sylvia’s memoir A Change of Heart. At 47, she received a heart and lung transplant and immediately started craving beer and chicken nuggets—foods she’d never liked.
Five months later, she dreamed about a young man named Tim whose surname began with L. In the dream, “we kiss, and as we do I inhale him into me…
I woke up knowing that Tim L was my donor and that some parts of his spirit and personality were now in me.”
She described feeling like “a second soul was sharing my body”—one that was stereotypically masculine, making her more aggressive and confident. Friends noticed she walked differently, and she found herself attracted to blonde women “as if some male energy in me was responding to them.”
When she finally traced her donor’s identity through an obituary, his name was indeed Tim L., and his family confirmed he’d been energetic with a love of chicken nuggets and beer—exactly the preferences she’d developed.
Note: Another woman who received a young man’s heart reported: “When we dance now, my husband says I always try to lead. I think it’s the macho male heart in me making me do that.”16
Paul Pearsall’s Groundbreaking Research
The most comprehensive study was done by neuropsychologist Paul Pearsall, who underwent bone marrow transplantation himself. For The Heart’s Code, he interviewed 73 heart transplant recipients, 67 other organ recipients, and families of 18 deceased donors.
As Pearsall reflected:
“When I listen to the tapes of my interviews with heart and heart-lung transplant recipients and the donor families, I am still taken aback by what they’ve shared with me.”
He identified consistent patterns:
Traumatic Memory Transfer: Recipients repeatedly recalled their donor’s death through dreams or physical sensations, despite knowing nothing about the donor.
Preference Changes: Dramatic shifts in food and music tastes matching the donor—vegetarians becoming carnivores and vice versa.
Sexual Orientation Changes: Including a lifelong lesbian becoming attracted to men and marrying one.
Note: One of my colleagues has a male patient who received a female heart, then became compelled to transition to becoming a woman—something never considered before the transplant. Likewise, a reader shared that after a man received a pig’s heart valve, “his wife found her husband had shifted from a normal sex life to wanting sex several times a day every day.”
Overwhelming Emotions: A Yale surgeon documented one recipient saying: “I can be sitting here feeling fine and all of a sudden something clicks and I get nervous… Something in my body changes, as if somebody pushed a button.”
The Most Extraordinary Cases
Pearsall documented several cases so remarkable they seem almost impossible. Given his meticulous citations and a published academic paper with independent verification, these deserve serious consideration:
The Murder Conviction: An eight-year-old who received a murdered ten-year-old’s heart began having nightmares about the killer. Using the child’s descriptions, police found and convicted the murderer based on completely accurate details about timing, weapon, location, and the victim’s final words.
The Artist’s Heart: The Daily Mail documented William Sheridan, whose drawing skills were “stuck at nursery level” until his heart transplant. Suddenly, he could produce beautiful drawings of wildlife and landscapes. His donor had been a keen artist.
The Copacetic Connection: A physician whose husband David died in a car crash later met a transplant recipient. She whispered to him, “I love you David. Everything is copacetic.” The recipient’s mother revealed: “My son uses that word ‘copacetic’ all the time now. He never used it before he got his new heart.” This had been the couple’s special signal.
The Violin Case: A 47-year-old foundry worker received a 17-year-old Black student’s heart and developed a fascination with classical music. Initially dismissing any connection (thinking his donor would prefer rap), he later learned the donor had died clutching his violin case on the way to violin lessons.
Complete Transformation: One recipient experienced multiple changes—feeling the donor’s fatal car accident in her chest, becoming vegetarian after being “McDonald’s biggest money-maker,” and changing from gay to straight:
“After my transplant, I’m not… I have absolutely no desire to be with a woman. I think I got a gender transplant.”
In rare cases, heart transplant recipients are able to meet their donors, due to a phenomenon known as “domino transplants” where a patient with failing lungs receives both a heart and lungs simultaneously and then donates their heart to someone else.
When Pearsall interviewed a heart transplant recipient (Fred) and his donor (Jim), both of their wives noted the husband had taken on personality traits of their heart donor (e.g., the depression and romanticism of Jim’s now deceased donor), and that Fred periodically subconsciously mistook his wife for Jim’s wife.
A longer list of some of the most compelling cases Pearsall came across can be found in the article he published. Many of the themes mentioned above are echoed within the article’s stories (e.g., the donor communicating to their family through the recipient, and the donor’s talents, fears or memories being transferred to the recipient).
Additionally, a brief documentary compiled on Pearsall’s work shows live testimonials of transplant recipients affirming these inexplicable transferences of consciousness do in fact happen.
See more here midwesterndoctor.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Howdy
| #
Medical types, as well as scientists, do not see. Everything has to be structured and viewed using some technological adjunct.
The body lives because of a symbiosis with another, so little doubt these traits can move across bodies.
Open your minds!
Reply