100% Diabetes Prevention Achieved With Natural Medicines

How a turmeric extract achieved what blockbuster drugs couldn’t, and why natural medicine holds the key to ending the type 2 diabetes epidemic
n 2012, a randomized controlled trial out of Thailand published in the American Diabetes Association’s own journal Diabetes Care1 delivered an astonishing result: not a single person in the curcumin-treated group progressed from prediabetes to diabetes over 9 months1.
The patients took a curcumin extract (derived from turmeric) and achieved a 100 percent prevention rate – whereas 16.4 percent of the placebo group did go on to develop type 2 diabetes1.
In other words, curcumin stopped the disease in its tracks for every participant in the treatment arm. Equally remarkable, those taking curcumin saw improvements in beta-cell function (insulin-producing cells) and reduced insulin resistance, with very minor adverse effects reported.2
Imagine if a pharmaceutical drug showed 100 percent efficacy in preventing a major chronic disease. It would make headline news worldwide and fast-track to standard care.
Yet, because curcumin is a natural compound (and not profitably patentable), this landmark study remains little-known outside integrative health circles, or long term readership of GreenMedInfo.com where it was first reported on in 2013.
This disparity underscores a central issue: when natural substances achieve something extraordinary, the mainstream medical system often responds with a shrug – or silence.
A Stark Contrast: Drugs, Risks, and Limitations
No conventional diabetes drug comes close to curcumin’s prevention power. For instance, metformin – the leading medication given to high-risk patients – only reduced progression to diabetes by 31 percent over three years in the famous Diabetes Prevention Program study3.
Even lifestyle changes (diet and exercise), while highly effective (~58 percent risk reduction3), did not reach anywhere near 100 percent. Moreover, metformin’s modest benefits come with frequent side effects (gastrointestinal upset, B12 deficiency, etc.), and it treats symptoms rather than the root causes of metabolic dysfunction.
Meanwhile, some widely used drugs may exacerbate the epidemic. Notably, cholesterol-lowering statin medications – taken by tens of millions – have been linked to increased incidence of type 2 diabetes (alongside 350+ additional potential side effects).
In one large analysis of postmenopausal women, statin use was associated with a 48 percent higher risk of developing diabetes4. Other research led the FDA to add warnings about blood sugar elevations and diabetes risk to statin drug labels.
This bitter irony has not been lost on critics: a drug marketed to protect health (by lowering LDL cholesterol) can inadvertently trigger a new chronic disease. Statins also carry side effects like muscle damage and liver stress, and yet they remain extremely profitable for the pharmaceutical industry.
By contrast, natural approaches like curcumin tend to reduce inflammation, balance multiple pathways, and often carry side benefits (such as improved lipid profiles or antioxidant status) rather than side effects.
Curcumin (one of the world’s most deeply researched and validated natural substances), for example, also showed benefits in the study patients’ insulin sensitivity and inflammatory markers1.
The spice accomplishes these effects holistically, modulating gene expression and metabolic function in ways drugs can’t easily emulate. And curcumin is just one example among many.
Nature’s Pharmacy: 2,600 Studies and Counting
It may surprise those who equate “natural” with “unproven,” but there is a vast scientific evidence base supporting nutritional and botanical approaches to diabetes.
GreenMedInfo, a public database of peer-reviewed research, has catalogued approximately 2,600 study abstracts on Type 2 Diabetes (T2DM), encompassing 608 distinct natural substances shown to have beneficial effects5.
From common vitamins and minerals to herbs used for centuries, this research spans everything from basic biochemical studies to clinical trials.
Equally important, the database tracks dozens of everyday problem substances that worsen metabolic health. There are at least 66 substances and exposures identified as promoting or exacerbating T2DM5.
It’s a rogue’s gallery of modern life: refined sugar and high-fructose corn syrup, BPA and phthalates (endocrine-disrupting chemicals in plastics), organophosphate pesticides, and even pharmaceutical agents like statin drugs themselves.
The very fact that “Statin Drugs” has its own entry under problem substances with 30 distinct modes of toxicity speaks volumes – a reminder that aggressive cholesterol lowering at all costs can backfire metabolically6.
On the flip side, the library of natural anti-diabetic solutions is extensive and credible. These aren’t fringe folk remedies; they are backed by peer-reviewed studies from around the world. Below we highlight just a few of the star players with high evidence counts:
Berberine – an alkaloid from plants like Berberis (barberry) – has shown extraordinary promise. Over 70 published studies indicate berberine can improve blood sugar regulation in type 2 diabetics.
In head-to-head clinical trials, berberine has matched the glucose-lowering efficacy of metformin, including a significant drop in HbA1c, but with fewer side effects7.
One recent randomized trial in prediabetics even found berberine slightly outperformed metformin in reducing fasting blood sugar, with 20 percent of berberine patients reporting minor GI upset vs 30 percent in the metformin group7,8.
Berberine’s multifaceted action – activating AMPK (a metabolic master switch), improving insulin sensitivity, and modulating the gut microbiome – exemplifies how a natural compound can tackle disease on multiple fronts simultaneously.
Vitamin D – the “sunshine vitamin” – plays a crucial role in metabolic health. 61 studies in the GreenMedInfo database link vitamin D status or supplementation to better outcomes in type 2 diabetes.
Deficiency in vitamin D is associated with higher diabetes risk, whereas repletion can improve glycemic control. A comprehensive 2019 meta-analysis of 37 trials found that vitamin D supplementation significantly improved fasting blood glucose and HbA1c levels in diabetics9.
Vitamin D also helps quell inflammation, which is a driver of insulin resistance10. Considering its low cost and excellent safety profile, vitamin D is a no-brainer in any diabetes prevention or treatment plan – yet how often do you hear endocrinologists emphasize it?
Probiotics – supplemental beneficial microbes – target the gut dimension of diabetes. Dozens of studies show that altering gut flora can improve metabolic parameters. For example, probiotic and prebiotic supplementation has been found to significantly decrease markers of oxidative stress and inflammation in diabetic patients11.
Another set of trials noted improved insulin resistance and lower HbA1c when high-quality probiotic formulas were added to diabetics’ regimens12. The gut microbiome profoundly influences blood sugar and inflammation; by healing the microbiome, probiotics address a root cause of metabolic dysfunction rather than simply forcing blood sugar down.
GreenMedInfo lists 59 studies specifically on probiotics’ benefits in T2DM13 – pointing to an emerging, holistic therapeutic avenue.
Bitter Melon – Momordica charantia, a fruit used in traditional Asian medicine and cuisine – is aptly named for its sharp taste, but its effects on blood sugar are sweet indeed.
Rich in insulin-mimicking compounds, bitter melon helps cells uptake glucose. In fact, a GreenMedInfo review notes that bitter melon proved superior to the drug rosiglitazone (Avandia) in clinical comparisons with type 2 diabetic patients14. (Avandia, a once-popular diabetes drug, was infamously found to carry serious cardiac risks.)
Bitter melon has been shown in multiple trials to significantly lower fasting glucose levels and improve glycemic control. It may even help regenerate pancreatic beta cells in animal studies.
This humble vegetable exemplifies the power of food as medicine – and raises the question, why isn’t every endocrinologist telling patients to try bitter melon extract before moving to expensive drugs?
Magnesium – a mineral often deficient in modern diets – is another unsung hero in metabolic health. Magnesium is required for proper insulin secretion and function; low magnesium correlates with higher risk of developing diabetes15,16.
It’s estimated that a majority of adults fail to get enough. Clinical studies have demonstrated that magnesium supplementation improves insulin sensitivity and lowers fasting glucose in both at-risk individuals and type 2 diabetics17.
One 2016 review of randomized trials concluded magnesium not only reduced blood sugar but also blood pressure in diabetics – addressing two problems at once18. Ensuring adequate magnesium (through diet or supplements) is a simple, inexpensive step with a high potential payoff.
(And that’s just a sample – other natural compounds with extensive evidence for blood sugar control include cinnamon, alpha-lipoic acid, chromium, resveratrol, quercetin, gymnema sylvestre, green tea extract, and more.
Even lifestyle practices like yoga and meditation have documented anti-diabetic effects via stress reduction and improved endocrine function.) The takeaway is clear: we are richly endowed with natural tools to prevent and treat type 2 diabetes.
Many are as effective as drugs, safer, and far more accessible to the public – if only people are made aware of the research.
Why Aren’t These Solutions Front Page News?
If you’re feeling a mix of hope and anger reading this, you’re not alone. On one hand, the notion that diabetes may be preventable and even reversible using natural means is empowering.
On the other, it’s deeply frustrating that such information remains marginalized. Type 2 diabetes continues to afflict over 400 million people worldwide (with millions more undiagnosed or in prediabetic states), generating enormous suffering and healthcare costs.
Standard treatment focuses heavily on medications and devices (glucose monitors, insulin injections) that manage the condition but do not cure it. What if a significant percentage of those cases could be prevented or better managed with dietary supplements, herbs, and lifestyle changes?
The potential savings in health and dollars are staggering – yet mainstream funding for research in nutraceuticals and lifestyle medicine pales in comparison to drug development.
The reasons are economic and regulatory, not scientific. Natural substances usually cannot be patented, meaning no exclusive profits for anyone.
The curcumin study, for example, was a rarity funded by academic/government grants; no pharmaceutical company would invest millions in trials for turmeric extract, knowing they couldn’t own the “drug” at the end.
Similarly, once a natural therapy shows promise, there is little commercial incentive to spend money on public awareness campaigns or physician education about it. In fact, such information can even be seen as a threat to industries whose revenue relies on lifelong pill prescriptions.
It’s sobering to realize that a cheap spice derivative outperformed the billion-dollar diabetes drug metformin – but you won’t see that in a TV ad or hospital leaflet.
Moreover, current regulations often suppress communication about natural remedies.
In the United States, the FDA and FTC forbid supplement makers from making disease treatment or prevention claims, even if those claims are supported by scientific evidence, unless they undergo the full drug approval process (which is prohibitively expensive for an unpatentable substance).
This means that whereas a drug company can advertise a new medication’s trial results, a supplement company is legally barred from saying “curcumin prevents diabetes” or “berberine improves glucose control” on a product label.
The end result: the public remains largely unaware of these options, and even many doctors never learn about them in standard medical training (which is heavily influenced by pharmaceutical paradigms).
See more here substack.com
Some bold emphasis added
Header image: examine.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.

Jerry Krause
| #
Hi PSI Editor,
Based upon my experience, Sayer Ji’s articles only began appearing here about two months ago. The topic of one of his first was the accepted heath benefits of daily walking long distances. And he reported the result of his efforts to explain the body’s response to this exercise was that there was tiny organ (my word) in the foot which activated the healthful flow of blood.
This comment is to ask you to find this article and provide PSI readers and me a link to this article. For without his article any of my planned future comments would not likely make much, if any, sense.
Have a good day
Reply