WHO Health Regulations Become Legally Binding Today
The World Health Organisation‘s International Health Regulations have today become legally binding to any member of the United Nations that did not formally reject them in writing
These insidious regulations give the WHO the power to overrule the governments of the 194 members of the UN, and impose legally binding instructions which, unless that country has specifically rejected them, they must obey.
The purpose of these regulations, according to the WHO themselves, is to strengthen responses to potential future pandemics, in light of the ‘haphazard’ responses to the ‘Covid’ ‘pandemic’, so that every UN-member nation responds in the same way.
It might sound innocuous enough, but the regulations allow the WHO to impose lockdowns, restrictions on freedom of movement, compulsory, though I prefer the word forced, ‘vaccinations’ and vaccine ‘passports’, regardless of whether that member state thinks they are neccessary or not, confering “legislative and executive powers” to the WHO, overriding each member country’s national sovereignty in health matters.
As of yesterday, just six UN-member states had rejected these regulations; Slovakia, New Zealand, Iran, the Netherlands, South Africa and the USA. All the other member states are now legally bound by these regulations, including the UK.
It is especially interesting that New Zealand has rejected these regulations, as that country was actually a founding member of the UN, having joined on June 26, 1945. New Zealand was actively involved in the 1945 United Nations Conference on International Organization in San Francisco, where the UN Charter was drafted.
South Africa rejoined the UN General Assembly as a fully participating member in June 1994, after the end of apartheid. It had previously been suspended from participation due to its apartheid policies.
This is seen by mamny commentators as the latest effort by the globalists to extend their overreach further and further into our lives. The UN has stated for some years it thinks there should be a single government to rule the world, and nominates itself for that role.
What do men with power crave more than anything else? More power.
These ‘health’ regulations would allow the UN to impose open-ended draconian restrictions at the very sniff of anything that could pose a threat to public health or safety, and some astute commentators have already observed this could be used to impose ‘climate lockdowns’ to ‘save the planet’ from the ‘climate emergency’ that never existed.
In reality, these people are like James Bond megalomaniacs, bent on world domination, and by inventing an ‘existential crisis’ like ‘climate change’ and future pandemics that Biden said ARE coming, they get people to give up their rights and freedoms, which allows the gradual imposition of totalitarian dictatorships, where you either obey the state, or are forcibly put into prison, potentially permanently, or disappear one night and are never seen again.
This is the reailty that now confronts the 187 nations that accepted these regulations.
In a surprise move, this very afternoon, Italy also registered their rejection of these new regulations.
Header image: orfonline.org
About the author: Andy Rowlands is a British university graduate in space science and Principia Scientific International researcher, writer and editor who co-edited the 2019 climate science book ‘The Sky Dragon Slayers: Victory Lap‘
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
VOWG
| #
I did not vote for it, it is not binding.
Reply
Michael Abbott
| #
I always thought that the Covid scare was engineered to see how far they could control the public and use that information in the Climate Change restrictions to come which in itself will be the blueprint for World control.
Reply
Andy Rowlands
| #
That’s exactly it Michael.
Reply
JohnF
| #
You make it sound like it’s a democracy, where you get a vote.
Reply
Aaron
| #
until you realize a vote is only to legitimize the puppets of government
the pres is actually ‘elected’ by the electoral college, did you know only two states have to cast their vote as the people ‘voted’
The people have no say and will ‘get the government they deserve’, as oboma said
Government is a scam and a sham and is only detrimental to all living things on earth. laws are only laws because they say so, kinda like when kids ask parents why and are told ‘because I said so’
Just as you will never really own anything like a house, car, property ect….
“They” own it all because they say so
Judges, courts, politicians, enforcement, schools and on and on
We the People own NOTHING already
How does that make any sense
Reply
Tom
| #
Piss on that. No way is this binding on ANY human.
Reply
Michael Abbott
| #
It’s binding on Governments and Governments control what you can and cannot do. You might have the luxury of refusing vaccination Tom but, if the unvaccinated are restricted to home living, where is your freedom then?
Reply
Andy Rowlands
| #
Oh yes it is. If your government did not explicitly reject these regulations, they become legally binding on that government, and then on you.
Reply
VOWG
| #
Good luck on them forcing people. Many of us have had enough meddling with our lives we will not take anymore.
Reply
Dave
| #
The WHO and the UN failed to understand in the U.S. we have a thing called the Second Amendment.
Reply
Aaron
| #
so what line has to be crossed ?
Reply
Carbon Bigfoot
| #
My fucking property line!!
Reply
Aaron
| #
May be a bit late by that time
Reply
Frank S.
| #
“Legally Binding”? Not to me they aren’t!
Reply
Carbon Bigfoot
| #
Secretary’s Kennedy and Rubio just issued a joint statement that the United States will not be participating in the WHO’s revisions.
Reply
Len Winokur
| #
In the below video I noticed among the comments that “…it is still possible to withdraw from the WHO even after signing the ratification treaty. As the WHO Constitution allows for withdrawal with one year’s notice, and this right is generally recognised under international law.”.
Reply
Len Winokur
| #
The video URL I meant to include with my above comment: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHrK8LjqqZ8
Reply
Seriously
| #
Nothing in msm….anyone else? So, if the people don’t know this is happening, did it? Looks like things can change with the next administration….needs an amendment- one that doesnt’ expire’ after a certain number of years…
Reply
Aaron
| #
Yup left/right left/right
stomp stomp stomp stomp
no matter which master you ‘vote’ for, its the same game
Reply