NASA ‘Pollution’ Tracking Satellite ‘Lost In Space’
NASA has lost contact with an $88 million satellite, partly funded by Jeff Bezos, designed to track methane emissions
The BBC reported on this a few days ago in its usual alarmist way:
An $88m (£65m) satellite designed to detect releases of the planet-warming gas methane from oil and gas production has been lost in space in a major setback for climate efforts.
The MethaneSat satellite, which had backing from Google and billionaire Jeff Bezos, was launched only last year aboard an Elon Musk SpaceX rocket.
It was meant to collect data for five years on sources of the powerful greenhouse gas, which is responsible for nearly a third of human-induced warming, to help curtail the worst offenders.
The Environment Defense Fund, the NGO which oversees the satellite, said that communication was lost ten days ago and is currently undertaking an investigation into what happened.
Methane is the most potent of the greenhouse gases, and although it does not hang around in the atmosphere as long as carbon dioxide, it is 28 times stronger over a 100-year period.
Despite an international commitment to reduce methane levels by 30 percent by 2030, year-on-year it continues to rise with the target unlikely to be met, according to the European Space Agency.
The main sources of methane are from oil and gas production, farming and food decomposition in landfill.
But many of the current satellites that monitor it are operated privately, reducing transparency of who the worst offenders for methane release are.
MethaneSat came after years of development by the NGO Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) and once launched made much of its data publicly available, allowing scrutiny by governments and scientists.
It was backed by a consortium of tech giants including Google and billionaire Jeff Bezos, which together contributed $88m to the project.
The instruments used by the satellite are some of the most sensitive in the world, able to pick up much smaller sources of methane as well as “super-emitters”.
Improving the sensitivity is important for detecting releases from agriculture which are often much more diffuse than from oil and gas production.
‘Likely not recoverable’
Google said when it was launched it hoped its project would “fill gaps between existing tools”.
The company was using its artificial intelligence tools to process the data and generate a global methane map.
But after just a year in orbit, in what was meant to be a five-year programme, communication was lost with MethaneSat.
The team at EDF suspect that the satellite has lost power and said in a statement “that it is likely not recoverable.”
It went on to say that some of the software could be re-used but said it was too early to comment on whether a new satellite would be launched.
“To solve the climate challenge requires bold action and risk-taking and this satellite was at the leading edge of science, technology and advocacy,” it added.
One of the other major publicly-available sources of methane data is hosted by CarbonMapper. One of its sources of data is the TROPOMI instrument aboard the European Space Agency’s Sentinel-5P satellite. Although it continues to send back data its seven-year programme was meant to finish in October.
It is unclear how much longer it can continue to collect information, further limiting global efforts to track the greenhouse gas.
This is all complete nonsense of course. There is but one ‘greenhouse gas’; water vapour.
It is interesting to note that most alarmists claim methane is 21 times as potent as CO2, but now the BBC say 28 times, presumably to up the fearmongering.
Even if methane was 28 times as potent as CO2, there is a hundred times less of it in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide; 0.00017 percent compared to 0.04 percent.
In medical terms, this would be called ‘negative efficacy’, yet organisations like the BBC want you to believe these trace gasses, present in minute amounts, control our temperature.
Planetary temperature is controlled by the Sun, water vapour and air pressure.
See the BBC article here bbc.co.uk
Header image: Offshore Technology Focus
About the author: Andy Rowlands is a British university graduate in space science and Principia Scientific International researcher, writer and editor who co-edited the 2019 climate science book ‘The Sky Dragon Slayers: Victory Lap‘
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
John V
| #
The last sentence in this says it all. If only we could get this out to the masses of non critical thinkers and overly emotionally controlled people.
Reply
Aaron
| #
Not A Space Agency says it so it must be true
Talk about a money pit
We do get some cool cartoons and stories for our money though
Reply
crackpot
| #
I’m guessing the satellite’s eco-friendly windmill didn’t work as well as expected in space.
And what is it with people wanting to hold on to this stupid superstitious fear at all costs? Water vapor is not the one and only ‘greenhouse gas’ because there’s no such thing as a ‘greenhouse gas effect’ at all.
Reply