Net Zero is a Far-Left Tyrannical Death Star
Some friends have asked me to write more articles on the political and sociological impact of Net Zero. In addition, another contact put forward the suggestion that Net Zero is an attack on freedom. That idea has been turning over in my mind and I have concluded he was right and effectively, Net Zero is just a cloak for far-left tyranny.
The Political Compass
The Political Compass is a widely used tool to differentiate between different political ideas, philosophies and ideologies.
It is typically drawn with the x-axis representing left and right opinions along the economic dimension. The left represents a desire for the economy to be run by cooperative collective agency with substantial state intervention and the political right represents a desire for the economy to be left to the devices of competing individuals and organisations, otherwise known as free markets.
The y-axis represents the social dimension, with the top representing authoritarianism and the bottom representing libertarianism. For shorthand, we can shorten this to tyranny versus freedom.
Net Zero Is Far-Left Tyranny
We can characterise Net Zero along both axes of the political compass. Starting with energy policy, we can see that there are Government mandated subsidies for renewables which cost a fortune. Plus, intermittent renewables can bid low into the market and be dispatched onto the grid despite the full cost of renewables being much higher than the market clearing price. Then there’s extra subsidies for the Capacity Market to provide backup to intermittent renewables. In addition, there are even more subsidies for industry to compensate them for the resulting high electricity prices. There are extra subsidies for biofuels, green gas, green hydrogen and carbon capture and storage. On top of that, Miliband’s plan for Clean Power by 2030 sounds like a Soviet-era five-year plan for tractor production.
The Government and the Climate Change Committee are also intent on forcing landlords to install insulation measures, many of which have payback times measured in centuries. We also have subsidies for heat pumps and company EV drivers pay less tax than for petrol cars.
On the supply side, new drilling for both onshore and offshore oil and gas resources is effectively banned and the assets that remain are being taxed to oblivion with 78% marginal tax rates. Using gas to produce electricity attracts carbon taxes through the Emissions Trading Scheme amounting to about 20% of wholesale prices.
All of this takes energy policy as far away from free markets as it is possible to imagine. Net Zero is a far-left project that would not have been out of place in the USSR.
Turning to the vertical axis we can see that many of the proposed measures to achieve Net Zero can be described as tyrannical. First, the Climate Change Committee (CCC) is effectively beyond the control of Parliament and the people, because as former chair Lord Deben put it, Parliament has to seek the permission of the CCC to change the Carbon Budgets. To achieve the targets, the Government and their advisors want to interfere in our lives to an unprecedented extent. They are interfering in markets to mandate targets for heat pumps and EVs to change how we heat our homes and the type of car we drive. The Energy Act 2023 gives the authority for draconian powers to take control of EV chargers, batteries, home heating, washing machines, fridges and dishwashers. The Act even gives authority for powers of entry to check our smart appliances are compliant. Now the Government is planning to force pension schemes to merge into mega-funds and force them to invest in clean energy projects.
The CCC has recommended we cut our meat consumption by a third and cut the number of livestock by almost half. Of course, they also want us to eat “alternative proteins” which is code for things like insects.
Some of the advisors to Government are even more tyrannical. We have the Behavioural Insights Team (also known as the Nudge Unit) calling for regulation of advertising and for TV drama and news to promote upbeat stories about Net Zero. They also want to influence the physical, social, economic and digital environment to alter what is offered to consumers and change perceptions of what is socially acceptable.
They recommended that Government intervenes across vast swathes of the economy to align businesses, markets and institutions with Net Zero. These measures include a meat tax, making flights more expensive, defaulting us onto renewable energy tariffs and making heat pumps look cheaper than gas-boilers.
The National Energy System Operator (NESO) is planning to halve per capita energy consumption. They also want to “optimise” demand by introducing penal charges at peak times through Time of Use Tariffs (TOUTs). In other words, consumers need to organise their lives around the grid rather than the grid being designed to meet the needs of its customers.
The Government-funded UKFIRES project was even more extreme. They want all airports except Heathrow, Glasgow and Belfast to close by 2030 and all remaining airports as well as shipping to be eliminated by 2050. Road use must be cut by 40% by 2050. UKFIRES also calls for beef and lamb to be phased out by 2050, along with the production of cement, new steel and plastics. According to them, all conventional mortar and concrete should be phased out by 2050, meaning construction work will be limited to retrofit and adaptation of existing buildings. They are signalling they want to take us back to an agrarian society when lives were brutal and short.
These measures put Net Zero right at the top of the tyranny scale. In fact, if we substitute “Net Zero” for “the State” in Mussolini’s famous quote, we get close to describing the totalitarian Net Zero agenda: “Everything within Net Zero, nothing outside Net Zero, nothing against Net Zero”. The impact of centrally planned, expensive and scarce electricity, imposed by a tyrannical regime could well be as proportionately damaging as Mao’s Great Leap Forward, because there are no rich countries with low energy consumption and poorer people tend to live shorter lives.
If we translate this into film metaphors, Net Zero becomes the dark-side Death Star of far-left tyranny.
See more here Substack
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Tom
| #
With net zero, the lefties die off too. How dumb can these idiots be? Usually these cowards are too afraid of death.
Reply