Gravy Train of NIH “Indirects” Gets Bull-DOGEd
I talked to someone today who has recently received a coveted NIH RO1 grant. Instead of being happy she said she is terrified.
Why? Recently, Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has trimmed back “indirects” universities and hospitals slap on top of the direct research funded projects. This rate has grown from 15% over decades to >50% at many prestigious medical centers. The current indirect rate at Harvard is 69%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4104c/4104c040a0b8fa6e1e47026941a3f6104d8f19c0" alt=""
Research administrative personnel costs have exponentially grown over time creating more bureaucracy with all the policies and procedures put in place to justify those positions, office space, and resources.
The new policy, currently blocked by a federal court, would limit NIH research funding for “indirect costs,” or overhead expenses, to 15%, which is far below what most institutions receive.
I think this is a healthy trim for government-funded research in the United States. The public deserves more dollars going to the research itself and less being siphoned off as indirect, poorly justified overhead costs which amount to administrative largess.
See more here Thefocalpoints.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Tom
| #
…”Research administrative personnel costs have exponentially grown over time creating more bureaucracy with all the policies and procedures put in place to justify those positions, office space, and resources.”…it’s the Olympus Mons of corruption and grift.
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
I just posted a short blog post (https://principia-scientific.com/gravy-train-of-nih-indirects-gets-bull-doged/). I hope the audience here will find it helpful as well.
Dear DOGE:
Please consider looking into the CDC, NIH, and FDA for their virus work. They claim to have been working for years/decades on the topic, spending billions of dollars on “scientific research.” However, nowhere is the virus to be found (i.e., viruses do not exist). There is an urgent need to audit their claims.
Having worked in the science/chemistry area for over 50 years, including 30 years with Health Canada as a research scientist, I have not encountered such fraudulent scientific claims and activities.
Physicians And Their “Science” Are Getting Exposed link
Viruses/Vaccines: Disaster Manufactured by Medical Experts link
Selling Of Medicines In The Future – Suggestions link
Few Dare To Announce Unwelcome Truth link
People Losing Trust In Medical Professionals; Why? link
What is science, and who are scientists? link
My training and expertise – people ask! link
Reply