40 Trump-Appointed Science Advisors Purged; Media Silent
Michael Regan (pictured), the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, has been in office for less than a month but is already under fire for allegedly “politicizing” the policymaking process. Mr. Regan, who was narrowly confirmed by the Senate for his post earlier this month, surprised many this week by announcing the purge of more than 40 outside science consultants from two high-profile EPA advisory panels.
The dismissals specifically targeted Trump-era appointees to the Science Advisory Board and the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee.
In announcing the move, Mr. Regan described the decision as an agency-wide “reset” meant to restore “scientific integrity” after four years of the Trump administration.
“Today, we return to a time-tested, fair, and transparent process for soliciting membership to these critically important advisory bodies,” the EPA administrator said.
The Science Advisory Board, created by federal law in 1978, is tasked with reviewing the “scientific and technical information being used by the EPA” for the purpose of “regulations.” It is also responsible for reviewing EPA research programs that receive federal funding.
Similarly, the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee reviews all the scientific information and data used by the EPA when promulgating regulations on air quality and pollution.
Given the influence both panels have on policymaking, Mr. Regan’s dismissal of Trump-era appointees has sparked accusations of political meddling.
James Taylor, the interim president of the conservative Heartland Institute, told The Washington Times that the dismissals represented a “sad day for science, transparency, and representative government.”
“Michael Regan’s purge of EPA scientists and policy experts who may offer critical thinking in response to the Biden agenda is a complete politicization of science within our federal government,” Mr. Taylor said. “This shows that the Biden EPA cares nothing about science, the scientific method, or critical thinking.”
Mr. Regan has done little to calm such critiques. In fact, when announcing the dismissals, the EPA administrators repudiated former President Donald Trump for barring “academics and non-government officials who received EPA research grants” from serving on the committees.
Governmental watchdog groups, however, praise the Trump-era initiatives for expanding transparency within two powerful advisory bodies that hold significant sway over environmental regulations.
Mr. Regan and the White House defended the decision to dismiss the appointees Wednesday, alleging that Mr. Trump stacked the committees with energy executives, rather than scientists during his tenure.
The American Chemistry Council, the largest trade association representing chemical companies, pushed back on that characterization. The group noted that the Trump-era committees approved strong regulations and guidelines on air pollution and fracking.
See more here: climatechangedispatch.com
PSI editor’s note: One of those purged was Alabama State Climatologist John Christy, who works with Dr Roy Spencer at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, where they produce monthly charts of lower troposphere temperatures, which is where the signature of ‘climate change’ is supposed to appear.
Their latest chart, released two days ago, shows a significant drop in lower troposphere temperature, which is almost certainly caused by the solar minimum we are in.
Image: Dr Roy Spencer / UAH
John Christy said that this purge will allow the EPA under the Biden Administration to start with an advisory board that was “100percent compliant” with its views.
Hardly ‘balanced’ then.
Alabama News commented on it here: al.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Andy
| #
This is no surprise, but it is very concerning. Biden is surrounding himself with ‘Yes’ men, those who share the belief of ‘greenhouse warming’ and the mythical AGW.
Reply
Roger Higgs
| #
This is presumably what people who voted for puppet Biden want. However, most people didn’t vote for Biden.
Re. mythical AGW …
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348689944_Global_Warming_By_Surging_Sun_Not_CO2_5_Slides_5_Minutes
Reply
Joseph Olson
| #
“Only an Airhead Can Save Us from Air” > principia-scientific.org
NO gas molecule can capture, store, redirect or amplify radiant energy photons moving at the speed of light. Climaclownology is modern alchemy, and just as defective.
Reply
Artelia
| #
Solar radiation management when AlSO4 is sprayed into the air from aircraft, is pretty good at making it colder than it would otherwise be, when it is done during the day. I wish these aircraft would all be shot down and the operatives who man those which are drones.
Reply