34 Reasons to Doubt the COVID19 Virus Even Existed
With the benefit of applying skepticism and strict adherence to the scientific method the empirical proofs are telling us that the so-called COVID19 virus never existed outside flawed computer models.
I am fortunate to have studied, interviewed and collaborated with some incredibly insightful and resolute applied scientists, doctors and researchers and to have stood beside them pushing back against mass deception and scientific fraud.
Below are a selection of published articles collated at Principia Scientific International over the past three years addressing a growing concern among critical thinkers. The posts are comprised of the analyses of some of the most eminent experts in their respective fields.
Not least among them is Dr Mike Yeadon, former chief scientist at Pfizer. Yeadon’s assessment accords with the findings detailed in our new book, ‘Slaying the Virus and Vaccine Dragon.‘
As Dr Yeadon now states:
“I’VE GROWN INCREASINGLY FRUSTRATED about the way debate is controlled around the topic of origins of the alleged novel virus, SARS-CoV-2, and I have come to disbelieve it’s ever been in circulation, causing massive scale illness and death. Concerningly, almost no one will entertain this possibility, despite the fact that molecular biology is the easiest discipline in which to cheat.
That’s because you really cannot do it without computers, and sequencing requires complex algorithms and, importantly, assumptions. Tweaking algorithms and assumptions, you can hugely alter the conclusions.”
Like my esteemed colleague Dr Saeed Qureshi and many others at Principia Scientific International (PSI), Dr Yeadon could see there was a smoke screen created around bioweapons and Wuhan and a possible lab escape. It is an issue my co-authors and I addressed in our new book, Slaying the Virus and Vaccine Dragon.’
For the open-minded, we urge you to consider the possibility that COVID19 may have been the Biggest Lie ever perpetrated by our governments, the media and Big Pharma upon a dumbed down, compliant global population. To assist our readers in thinking and deciding for themselves, we urge you to read any and all of the following articles:
1) Why I Don’t Believe There Ever Was A Covid Virus [1]
“You all know my friend, Mike Yeadon. His take on the COVID scamdemic is privileged and he is not afraid to express exactly what he thinks as being the most plausible explanation. I have total respect for that courage.
2) The ‘No Virus’ Doctors: Why Are We Doing This? [2]
For far too long, it’s been the “freedom community” with the “no-virus” stance, positioned against the “pro-virus” community. There have been endless videos, Instagram posts, tweets, name-calling, and “de-bunking”. It’s time that we – recognized leaders of the “no-virus” team – restate why we remain committed to this growing worldwide movement.
For us, the reason is straightforward…it’s to experience a new concept of life, biology, and health, that is rooted in truth and freedom.
3) CDC/FDA Confess They Had No Virus They Created The Test For [3]
Each of the 59 different PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 told different lies and concocted different fabrications about the genetic makeup of the virus—the virus we didn’t have. Obviously, then, these tests would give unreliable results.
4) Gain Of Function Research – As Fake As The Virus! [4]
Laboratories and experts do not show any tangible product from the research of any “altered” virus. It is hard to believe, but there is no evidence that scientific research on the GoF aspect related to the virus has ever been conducted.
The GoF research appears to be just another catchy phrase like the virus, virus-RNA, spike-protein, variant, isolation, sequencing, etc., without real-world evidence. One can argue that experts and authorities have thoroughly fooled the public and others and wasted public and private financial resources.
5) Video: 5,700 COVID Cases Show Blood Poisoning, No Virus [5]
More evidence emerging that the COVID-19 pandemic may be down to a blood vessel disease rather than a contagious virus.
In a new video interview Dr Zach Bush MD gives his expert analysis. Dr Bush has become a national voice in America speaking out against the misinformation and fear porn thrown at us during the COVID-19 pandemic.
6) Finally, Pfizer’s Former Top Scientist Agrees With PSI: “No ‘Covid’ Virus” [6]
Mike Yeadon, the molecular biologist and toxicologist, longtime leader of Pfizer’s respiratory research division, has become persona non grata to the lying mainstream media for daring to admit what Principia Scientific International researchers were first saying in the early stages of the pandemic – no lab and no government has ever provided a gold standard isolate of the ‘SARS-CoV-2’ or ‘covid virus.’
7) No-Virus People Were Right About Fake ‘Virus Isolation’, Fake ‘Sequencing’ [7]
A document authored by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich was recently posted online, outlining a “covid” legal strategy In this article, Reiner referenced Dr. Mike Yeadon (who has moved on from the covid “virus” hypothesis altogether) and a presentation which Reiner considered “brilliant” and “scientific”, from a man who acts as science advisor to RFK Jr. and Children’s Health Defense, Jay Couey.
Reiner also included a summary of alleged covid-19 facts, based on Jay’s presentation. In this summary, the “SARS-COV-2” narrative has been dropped entirely, admitting that there was no such thing.
8) Pfizer Whistleblower: Covid Not A Virus, It’s A Parasitic Nano-Weapon [8]
New documents show that the ‘coronavirus’ and vaccines are biosynthetic parasites. That’s according to former Pfizer VP Karen Kingston, who provided proof that they are cleverly disguised bioweapons.
She explains how the “spike protein” is a magnetized lipid nanoparticle about 10 microns, so 1/100th the size a “virus” would be, but there was never any coronavirus involved. Kingston points out that this MPED (magnetized lipid nano-particle) contains CRISPR-Cas9 (CRISPR Associated Protein 9).
Cas9 is a 160-kilodalton protein that plays a vital role in the immunological defense of certain bacteria against DNA viruses and plasmids, and is heavily utilized in genetic engineering applications. Its main function is to cut DNA and thereby alter a cell’s genome.
9) CDC-Funded Study: COVID Shots Have No Effect On Virus Transmission [9]
People who are unvaccinated spread the COVID-19 delta variant virtually the same as the vaccinated, according to a study in a federal prison funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “In this investigation, we found no statistically significant difference in transmission potential between vaccinated persons and persons who were not fully vaccinated,” the researchers said.
10) HHS Documents Show CDC Has Not Isolated Any “Covid-19 Virus” [10]
….in short, common cold viruses and monkey virus fragments found in flu shots are being mislabeled “covid,” and there is a weaponized spike protein bioweapon that’s being distributed via vaccine injections. That’s all real. But there’s no such thing as a real, physical, isolated covid-19 virus that has been harvested from sick people and shown to infect other people and make them sick.
11) Top Govt Health Official Admits In Canada Court COVID19 Virus Not Proven [11]
Both in law and in science, the virus does NOT exist. Canada court hears top government health officer admit on the record that no isolated SARS-COV-2 virus exists. Alberta Judge upholds citizen defendant’s argument that health officials patently failed to submit scientific proof of COVID19.
12) Did The COVID Virus Actually Kill Anyone? [12]
Evidence to support the “fragile healthcare hypothesis” and genetic “vaccine” mediated incidence of infection and disease, without which there may have been no unusual excess death in Europe
13) Sequencing Of The Covid Virus – Never Been Done! [13]
It is generally accepted now that the virus SARS-COV-2 has not been isolated. But unfortunately, virologists and medical experts still believe in it and make false claims. Their view on virus existence and/or isolation is described as follows (from the Reuters Fact Check team – link):
“There are numerous examples of scientists isolating SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID -19, and sequencing its genome.
The argument about purification relates to 19th Century microbiological theory that does not apply to viruses.
The novel coronavirus has been proven to exist and has caused millions of deaths worldwide.”
If one reads the sentence carefully, “The argument about purification relates to 19th Century microbiological theory that does not apply to viruses,” it means they do not believe in standard (old fashion) purification of things and do not have the (purified) virus.
That is, there is no isolated virus available. Therefore, the non-existence of the virus has been accepted indirectly.
14) Max Igan: No Wuhan Virus Bioweapon, It Is All Pure Psyops! [14]
The Covid Scamdemic is now awakening so many people, enabling them to see the scientific fraud and lies Big Pharma, politicians and academia have foisted on the world’s population. Dr Bailey gives an excellent presentation on these topics. It may well impact your understanding of disease and how to stay healthy.
15) The Non-Existent Virus; And The Implications [15]
What are the implications? The COVID PCR and antibody tests are designed to detect a virus that isn’t there. The COVID case and death numbers—stemming from the virus—are meaningless.
The lockdowns, masks, distancing, the closure of businesses, the economic destruction—all based on stopping the virus—are unnecessary, meaningless, vastly criminal.
People who have been dying have been dying for various other reasons—but their deaths have been relabeled and repackaged as “caused by the virus.”
The vaccine is supposed to protect against…what? The virus that isn’t there.
16) Top Lab Test Expert: COVID-19 Virus ‘Does NOT Exist’ [16]
Dr Qureshi writes on his blog www.drug-dissolution-testing.com the following analysis to clear up the lies and confusion on this issue:
During a discussion on LinkedIn with one of the microbiologists, I came to know how they described virus isolation, which is as follows:
“A virus isolate is a virus isolated from an infected host. The process is called “isolation,” which separates viruses from the hosts.”
It means that for microbiologists and virologists, taking a swab sample, which separates virus from the host, is considered as “virus isolation.”
This interpretation does not reflect the correct meaning and understanding of the subject of isolation. But, they imply and promote the true meaning of the process of isolation, i.e., to obtain something by extraction, purification, and identification, reflected by well-known pretty pictures of the DNA/RNA, proteins, and viruses such as a spherical body with spikes (aka coronavirus).
The virologists’ version of the definition is incorrect and causing the problem. Wherever one looks for the virus, one always finds a suffix with it, e.g., “virus isolate,” “virus culture,” “virus lysate,” etc., (which are soups, mixtures or gunks), never “virus” alone; however, it is presented and promoted as pure “virus.”
The Made-Up Definition Of “Virus-Isolation” Makes The Story Of The SARS-CoV-2 Virus, Its Infection, And Pandemic Very Clear, I.E., Nothing Is Real About Them, But All Are Fake. No One Has Seen The Virus, Found It, Or Isolated It As Claimed. It Is All Bogus.
17) COVID19 Diagnosis Is Medical Fraud [17]
An infectious disease cannot be diagnosed by identifying a virus because having the virus does not always lead to disease or even serious disease. An infection without symptoms produces immunity and this is how herd immunity is established in populations. Frank McFarlane Burnet won the Nobel Prize for this science in 1960.
In 2020 a new infectious disease appeared called ‘COVID19’, yet it can only be diagnosed with a test. If you don’t take the test the symptoms are the same as many other “flu-like illnesses” caused by hundreds of different viruses, bacteria, medications, and vaccines.
In fact, since 2020 you don’t need any symptoms at all to be classified as a “case of COVID19 disease”.
18) Health Canada Has No Record Of ‘COVID-19 Virus’ Isolation [18]
(And yes, we are aware of the many publications wherein authors claim to have “isolated the virus”. We’ve looked at numerous such studies and have yet to see one where they actually did so. Claiming to have done something and actually doing it are sometimes 2 different things, even in peer-reviewed science. And yes we are aware of the many published alleged “SARS-COV-2 genomes” – these were in fact manufactured, not discovered. And yes we are aware that EM photos have been published, allegedly of “the virus”, however a photo of something does not tell you what the thing is, where it came from or what it does. One has to scrutinize the Methods used to “isolate the virus” / obtain said photos / obtain alleged genomes, and that is when absolutely everything falls apart with “COVID-19”.)
19) COVID Re-Infection ‘Confirmed’ – More Evidence Virus Has Not Been Isolated [19]
As always, take the information discussed in the video and research it for yourself, and come to your own conclusions. Anyone telling you what the truth is, or claiming they have the answer, is likely leading you astray, for one reason or another. Stay Vigilant.
20) UKs Govt Office For Science Admits No Proof Of Isolated ‘COVID-19 Virus’ [20]
A colleague in New Zealand and I have been submitting Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to various institutions in Canada, NZ, Australia, Germany, the U.K., England, Ireland and the U.S., seeking any records that describe the isolation of a “COVID-19 virus” aka “SARS-COV-2” from an unadulterated sample taken from a diseased human patient.
Our requests have not been limited to records of isolation performed by the respective institutions, or limited to records authored by the respective institutions, rather they have been open to any records held by the institutions describing “COVID-19 virus” isolation performed by anyone, anywhere, any time.
21) Even CDC Now Admits No ‘Gold Standard’ Of COVID19 Virus Isolate [21]
Damning CDC document confirms Principia Scientific International claims that there has NEVER been any successful laboratory test to isolate and confirm the existence of the SARS-COV2 virus, alleged to have caused the COVID19 pandemic. In effect, the science tells us there is NO virus!
22) COVID-19: Vaccine ‘Not Possible’ For A Virus Not Yet Quantifiable [22]
In most cases (in fact, in almost all cases) the presence/absence of the virus is established by indirect testing. These indirect tests are commonly known as PCR and antibody tests. Without going into technical details, one may consider that these tests monitor specific types of proteins or related chemicals which are produced by the presence of viruses, not only by SARS-CoV2 or COVID-19, but by all pathogenic viruses as a defence mechanism to get rid of the viruses and/or to protect our bodies from their ill effects.
23) What If COVID Had Nothing To Do With A Virus? [23]
What if COVID-19 has nothing at all to do with a virus? Has this fake pandemic capitalized on people’s ignorance of the true nature of acidosis, disease, viruses and terrain theory? Below we examine the medical opinion of Dr. Robert Young which ties in with Antoine Bechamp‘s terrain theory.
24) Top Pathologist: ‘NO ONE Has Died From The Coronavirus!’ [24]
A high-profile European pathologist is reporting that he and his colleagues across Europe have not found any evidence of any deaths from the novel coronavirus on that continent. Dr. Stoian Alexov called the World Health Organization (WHO) a “criminal medical organization” for creating worldwide fear and chaos without providing objectively verifiable proof of a pandemic.
Another stunning revelation from Bulgarian Pathology Association (BPA) president Dr. Alexov is that he believes it’s currently “impossible” to create a vaccine against the virus.
He also revealed that European pathologists haven’t identified any antibodies that are specific for SARS-CoV-2
25) Denis Rancourt: There Was No Pandemic [25]
“…the excess mortality was not caused by any particularly virulent new pathogen. COVID so-called response in-effect was a massive multi-pronged state and iatrogenic attack against populations, and against societal support structures, which caused all the excess mortality, in every jurisdiction.”
26) NIH Spends $1 Billion Studying ‘Long Covid’–Produces Nothing [26]
Many people who’ve received COVID-19 shots report long COVID-like symptoms,17 such as memory problems, headaches, blurred vision, loss of smell, nerve pain, heart rate fluctuations, dramatic blood pressure swings, and muscle weakness.
27) Dr. Saeed Qureshi On Slaying The Virus & Vaccine Dragon – Part 2 [27]
Dr. Qureshi is a specialist in analytical chemistry and covers the science of substances, isolation, identification, characterization, purification, test developments, validation, and their uses. During his 30 years of employment at Health Canada, he recognized something that should have quickly altered testing in the pharmaceutical industry. The test results, from the drug dissolution testing protocol used worldwide in the pharmaceutical industry, were all invalid.
28) Over 300 Covid Papers Withdrawn For Not Meeting Standards Of Scientific Soundness [28]
An investigation by Monash University reported that even after papers were retracted, they continued to be cited.
“Among the more than 270,000 COVID-19 papers that have been lodged online since the start of the pandemic, 212 retracted papers investigated were cited 2,697 times, a median of seven times per paper,” the university said in Oct. 2022.
29) COVID-19 Vaccines Had No Effect On Overall Mortality [29]
Overall mortality spiked in a number of highly vaccinated countries after the vaccines were rolled out, including the United States.
30) Interview: Slaying The Virus & Vaccine Dragon (Part 1) [30]
Slaying the Virus and Vaccine Dragon identifies that modern democracies commonly suffer from a fatal weakness, in that they rely on politicians and government scientists to maintain high ethical standards, indefinitely.’
31) Mind Viruses And Their Vectors [31]
…the Noble Lie is a concept attributed to Socrates and discussed in Book III of Plato’s “The Republic”, which holds that the use of noble lies by the ruling caste is necessary to uphold social cohesion within an ideal society (The Republic). In many ways, this is the root of the internal justification employed by the various bureaucrat/administrative state actors that have authorized and funded (using taxpayer funds) the fearporn and pro-vax propaganda campaigns.
32) Lancet Finally Acknowledges Natural Immunity Superior To Covid Vaxxes [32]
“The Lancet is finally acknowledging what doctors and scientists have been gaslit for saying for years — that natural immunity provides superior protection to experimental vaccines,” said Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., chairman and chief litigation counsel for Children’s Health Defense.
33) Mass Exodus Of Scientists Leaving CDC, FDA: ‘Not Following The Science’ [33]
“There’s been a large amount of turnover. Morale is low,” one high-level official at the CDC told us. “Things have become so political, so what are we there for?” Another CDC scientist told us: “I used to be proud to tell people I work at the CDC. Now I’m embarrassed.”
34) Virus Skeptics Vs Believers Showdown: Settling The Debate With Blind Experiments [34]
Dr. Tim Cowan, who has been practicing medicine for 37 years, suggests that having a political or scientific debate regarding the existence of disease-causing viruses would be a waste of time. He suggests doing different kinds of experiments to show that virus particles don’t cause disease.
He also says the virologists won’t even debate or ‘waste their time’ debating what they consider settled science (you’ve heard that before).
Dr. Cowan says that to prove the viral particle exists, you first need to find the particle in the tissues or fluids in a sick person or animal, purify it, characterize the proteins, characterize the genetic material, prove that all the proteins are coded for and by the genetic material, and show pictures of this isolated, purified particle.
Once that’s done, you then show this ‘isolated, purified particle causes the same illness or similar illness in a laboratory animal.’
But virologists insist you can’t find this particle in any fluid or sick person as it’s not part of the virology repertoire; therefore, they won’t do the experiment.
References:
John O’Sullivan is CEO and co-founder (with Joe Olson and Dr Tim Ball) of Principia Scientific International (PSI) and hosts the weekly Sky Dragon Slaying science show on TNT Radio. John is a seasoned science writer and legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann in the ‘science trial of the century‘. O’Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘Slayers’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world’s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory , follow-up book on CO2 and Slaying the Virus and Vaccine Dragon.
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Trackback from your site.
Saeed Qureshi
| #
Great work, John. Thank you!
Reply
John O'Sullivan
| #
Saeed, my thanks to you for all you have been doing to defend the traditional scientific method and expose the fallacies in virology that the establishment refuses to address.
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
Thank you, John.
Reply
Ogmios
| #
That’s a well put forward case on which I am not competent to judge. I can understand the advantages for Western elites, China and most of the remainder of the world going along with a hoax being insufficient strong enough to challenge the narrative. I don’t understand why Russia and Iran would accept a hoax, what do they gain? Both have experts in the field who are more than competent.
I would be greatly interested in studies from either country which I would view as being far more independent given they are hardly friends of the United States of Blackrock. (I stole that one).
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
Ogmios:
I understand your frustration. However, a non-US/European medical institution (or any other not under their influence) would not be able to correct the situation or address the issues.
Because the issue is of science (or lack thereof), modern medical experts worldwide never studied the science or taught to do any experimental studies. However, given the authority to develop diseases (e.g., COVID-19, AIDS) and their treatment (e.g., vaccine), they claim to be doing “science” when they have not learned/done any science.
So, the only solution is that the medical and pharmaceutical experts have to return to their traditional role, for which they got the training, i.e., act like tradespersons to diagnose (well-established diseases) and suggest their pre-established treatments. One would immediately start to see the disappearance of diseases, pandemics, and “new” medicines.
They have to stop promoting themselves as scientists or science researchers. It is a false description of their trade and training, causing the problems.
Reply
Tom
| #
Just wait…we had CoV-1 and Cov-2 and on standby, CoV-3 which was mentioned by Chinese virologists in 2007 in the Clinical Journal of Microbiology. It’s gonna be another new fake virus on a whole other level. People will be dying to get the murder injections of even deadlier mRNA psycho-spike-nanonized particles.
Reply
Chris
| #
it is not good to cite ONLY one source of all references, in my opinion.
I’d add also this fact. Official NIH data LISTED the entire sequence of the Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 isolate Wuhan-Hu-1, complete genome RefSeq: NC_045512.2
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/datasets/taxonomy/2697049/
all the way at the begin of 2020. That one I used to do lot of bioinformatics analysis evers since then. That was EXTREMELY useful, despite of other fact, that a worldwide data base of biological 3D structures never listed the SARS-CoV-2 virus, BUT instead, the Spike protein with by now hundreds if not thousands of 3D structural data, showing all sorts of interactions within countless complexes.
NONE of those structures represent the ENTIRE virus… BUT, what they show is the Spike, the ingredient of every single covid ‘vaccine’ out there. The analysis of that Spike alone, shows enough CRIME perpetuated by the scientists, one does not even need the entire virus, which is not even listed anywhere with its 3D coordinates…
Reply
cn
| #
Principa Scientific is just the aggregator the sources come from many different locations .
NEVER EVER trust the CDC or the NIH , the WHO or the FDA they’re the ones who have been lying about everything.
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
Chris:
I do not know how knowledgeable you are in the science/chemistry behind isolating things (including viruses). Your comment shows you are not well-versed in the area because you buy the CDC lie as truth or science. I am sorry; please reconsider your thoughts and thinking to know the reality and the false science sold to you. For example, your comment;
“I’d add also this fact. Official NIH data LISTED the entire sequence of the Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 isolate Wuhan-Hu-1, complete genome RefSeq: NC_045512.2https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/datasets/taxonomy/2697049/”
In the link you provided, please look for the file “genomic.fna” that describes the genomic data. However, read the title or first line of the file; it says
Note the word, isolate, which is NOT the virus or isolated virus. However, using the word “isolate” is misleading and fooling people (including you) that this is from the virus and the virus has been isolated. This is not from the virus. (https://bioanalyticx.com/buyer-beware/).
Technically, sequencing can only be done with (isolated) virus’s RNA/DNA, not with isolate, which is gunk, and no one knows what is in it. (https://bioanalyticx.com/sequencing-of-the-virus-never-been-done/).
So, stating the virus has been isolated, and the genome has been sequenced, based on the isolate, is an extreme example of incompetence and ignorance about science and deceiving people. Sorry!
Reply
Colin Edge
| #
Face Book circulation
Extract: Rise of the Shill – (Society in a Centrifuge)
Author: Colin Edge © 2023
Retired UK Police Inspector
The Fraud of Virology (key points primer)
1) Not a single controlled experiment by the hands of humans has ever demonstrated the spread of disease and contagion by an ANY virus. This has been tried multiple times throughout history and has failed in this quest. This includes the Spanish flu pandemic of 1918.
Milton J. Rosenau, MD:
“We used some billions of these organisms , according to our estimated counts, on each one of the volunteers, but none of them took sick,” said Milton J. Rosenau
“ The volunteers were led up to the bedside of the patient; he was introduced. He sat alongside the bed of the patient. They shook hands, and by instructions, he got as close as he conveniently could, and they talked for five minutes. At the end of five minutes, the patient breathed out as hard as he could, while the volunteer, muzzle to muzzle (in accordance with his instructions, about 2 inches between the two), received this expired breath, and at the same time was breathing in as the patient breathed out. This they repeated five times. The volunteers were watched carefully for seven days, but alas, “none of them took sick in any way.”
Disease ridden patients donated blood. These samples were injected into healthy volunteers. Not a single participant got sick.
Further experiments have been repeated through history with ‘alleged’ corona viruses. None have them have proved transmission or contagion. These exploits will be discussed closely in the main chapters.
Computer generated animations showing air droplets cascading to another do not demonstrate contagion. Viruses and contagion have never been demonstrated in ANY controlled experiment.
Understanding the Cytopathic Effect:
In vitro experiments are those that take place in a lab (desktop exploits that try to demonstrate the existence of viruses). These experiments are external to a host and have no reference to the actual physical responses that would occur within that host (animal or human). The ONE AND ONLY way that virologists state that a virus exists is utilising the cytopathic effect.
Modern virologists state ‘the cytopathogenic effect (abbreviated CPE) refers to structural changes in host cells that are caused by the viral invasion. The infecting virus causes lysis of the host cell or when the cell dies without lysis due to the inability to reproduce.
In order to demonstrate the cytopathic effect the following procedure is adopted. Lung fluid from an allegedly ‘infected’ person is mixed with a toxic mix of chemicals and other animal DNA (monkey kidney cells, fetal calf serum). They also add powerful cyto and nephrotoxins, antibiotics and antifungal drugs to the tissue culture. No virus is ever ‘isolated.’ Special resins are applied to the culture so that the sample can be cut into wafer thin cross sections and placed under an electron microscope. The cytopathic effect is observed at this point. Spikey ball like objects appear. Some are elongated, others are not. This is what virologists call viruses. Virologists don’t complete ANY controlled experiments. They just accept what they see and say that what they are witnessing are viruses.
Remember, these are desktop experiments that have no reference to a host. The cytopathic effect is accepted by virology as the presence of viruses.
A number of experts have completed ‘controlled experiments’ in recent years. A controlled experiment is where the same procedure is undertaken but does not include the ‘alleged’ infected mucous of a sick person. All the chemicals, DNA and resins are used and the same stringent protocols are executed. The cytopathic effect is observed. Spikey balls – some elongated – others not. These are consequences of the desktop (in vitro) experiment. This proves that viruses were NOT being witnessed in the primary experiment. What is being witnessed is an artifact of the experiment itself.
In order to boost their claims of cytopathic effect, virologists use a source of RNA. It is a matrix substance, not an ordinary yeast. It is added because when lung fluid is placed in the cell culture it results in a large amount of nucleic acids. With the help of RNA they try to mimic human sputum. This neutral substance is not pathogenic.
By stringing fragments of nucleic acid strands together and saying this is what the virus looks like is an absurdity, abhorrent and utter disgrace to anyone with an ounce of integrity. No virus has ever been isolated.
Here is a quote from a journal entitled ‘Viruses’ in 2020: (THE ROLE OF EXTRACELLULAR VESICLES (EVs) AS ALLIES OF HIV, HCV AND SARS VIRUS):
“Nowadays, it is an almost impossible mission to separate EV’s and viruses by means of canonical vesicle isolation methods, such as differential ultracentrifugation, because they are frequently co-pelleted due to their similar dimension. To overcome the problem, different studies have proposed the separation of EVs from virus particle by exploiting their different migration velocity in a density gradient or using the presence of specific markers that distinguish viruses from EVs. However, to date, a reliable method that can actually guarantee a complete separation DOES NOT EXIST.”
Author’s explanation = NO VIRUS HAS EVER BEEN ISOLATED. This is demonstrated by the controlled ‘cytopathic’ effect experiment.
Dr Stefan Lanka (PHD) a German microbiologist: states that nobody has ever isolated any alleged pathogenic virus. Isolating means separating it from other genetic material. No virus has even been seen in blood samples, saliva samples or tissue. Dr Lanka states that electron microscopes have never seen a virus in any body fluid sample. In contrast, bacteria has been isolated, observed and categorised. The belief remains that if a patient has believed infectious disease and bacteria cannot be observed, then a virus must be the poison.
The internet provides a myriad of documents that can be found claiming isolation of viruses with supporting electron microscopy images. They have been used by such propogandists as Reuters Fact Check and Factcheck.org. Titles such as: MORPHOMETRY OF SARS-COV-2 PARTICLES IN ULTRATHIN SECTIONS OF INFECTED VERO CELL CULTURES is a typical grandiosity. Controlled cytopathic effect experiments negate all these findings.
Louis Pasteur, hailed as the father of virology, never proved the existence of a virus. His primary interest was in the fermentation of wines and how spores could influence growth and death in plants. One of the greatest plagiarists in human history – he stole his ideas from a colleague – Professor Pierre Bechamp. Louis Pasteur theorised that an airborne virus may exist – but never proved it. His theory caught on and was further weaponised by John Enders (Rockefeller Institute) in the 1950s. The Rockefellers had a vast amount of unused petroleum product and infiltrated medical schools with funding that allowed the theory of contagion to spread. Their goal was to use the petroleum in vaccines.
What is a virus genome sequence or viral sequencing?
Virologists state the following:
‘The genome sequence of a virus is the sequence or order of bases or letters that makes up a virus’s genetic material, or its genome. If you were to write down the genome sequence of a particular coronavirus, it would be a series of about 30,000 letters. The key is to get them in just the right order that you find them in a particular virus.
In the case of RNA, scientists use the letters A, C, G, and U, which stand for each of the four RNA bases: adenine, cytosine, guanine, and uracil. It’s the same for DNA, except it’s a T for thymine in place of uracil. The process scientists use to figure out the right order of letters in a certain sample of virus is called genome sequencing.’
Authors note: NO VIRUS HAS EVER BEEN ISOLATED. To ‘isolate’ means separating it from other material. This has NEVER been done. Extravesicular vesicles (EVs) are indistinguishable from an ‘alleged’ virus because they are the same entity. This is observed in a controlled ‘cytopathic effect’ experiment. Therefore ANY ‘alleged’ genome composition is pure science fiction. Variants DO NOT exist for the same reason. These are computer modelling constructs that have nothing to do with an ‘isolated virus.’ Virus structure is unknown because viruses have never been isolated and categorised. Spike protein is NOT obtained from ANY virus. Studies show that they do NOT get this protein from the virus. They use a ‘recombinant protein’ in the laboratory using computer-generated genetic sequences. This is not a real spike protein from a virus.
In my next primer I will be giving key points on nitric oxide and interstitial lung disease. A cascade of events in the body – initially impacting mitochondria (energy cells).
The primary signs and symptoms of interstitial lung disease are:
• Shortness of breath at rest or aggravated by exertion
• Dry cough
Source:
Nitric Oxide and Peroxynitrite in Health and Disease. National Institute of Health (NIH)
‘The truth will be hidden in their face so closely they will be unable to focus upon it until it is too late.’
J.D. Rockefellers’ Secret Covenant
Author: Colin Edge
18/06/2023
Reply
Colin Edge
| #
Face Book circulation
Extract: Rise of the Shill – (Society in a Centrifuge)
Author: Colin Edge © 2023
Retired UK Police Inspector
The Fraud of Virology (key points primer)
1) Not a single controlled experiment by the hands of humans has ever demonstrated the spread of disease and contagion by an ANY virus. This has been tried multiple times throughout history and has failed in this quest. This includes the Spanish flu pandemic of 1918.
Milton J. Rosenau, MD:
“We used some billions of these organisms , according to our estimated counts, on each one of the volunteers, but none of them took sick,” said Milton J. Rosenau
“ The volunteers were led up to the bedside of the patient; he was introduced. He sat alongside the bed of the patient. They shook hands, and by instructions, he got as close as he conveniently could, and they talked for five minutes. At the end of five minutes, the patient breathed out as hard as he could, while the volunteer, muzzle to muzzle (in accordance with his instructions, about 2 inches between the two), received this expired breath, and at the same time was breathing in as the patient breathed out. This they repeated five times. The volunteers were watched carefully for seven days, but alas, “none of them took sick in any way.”
Disease ridden patients donated blood. These samples were injected into healthy volunteers. Not a single participant got sick.
Further experiments have been repeated through history with ‘alleged’ corona viruses. None have them have proved transmission or contagion. These exploits will be discussed closely in the main chapters.
Computer generated animations showing air droplets cascading to another do not demonstrate contagion. Viruses and contagion have never been demonstrated in ANY controlled experiment.
Understanding the Cytopathic Effect:
In vitro experiments are those that take place in a lab (desktop exploits that try to demonstrate the existence of viruses). These experiments are external to a host and have no reference to the actual physical responses that would occur within that host (animal or human). The ONE AND ONLY way that virologists state that a virus exists is utilising the cytopathic effect.
Modern virologists state ‘the cytopathogenic effect (abbreviated CPE) refers to structural changes in host cells that are caused by the viral invasion. The infecting virus causes lysis of the host cell or when the cell dies without lysis due to the inability to reproduce.
In order to demonstrate the cytopathic effect the following procedure is adopted. Lung fluid from an allegedly ‘infected’ person is mixed with a toxic mix of chemicals and other animal DNA (monkey kidney cells, fetal calf serum). They also add powerful cyto and nephrotoxins, antibiotics and antifungal drugs to the tissue culture. No virus is ever ‘isolated.’ Special resins are applied to the culture so that the sample can be cut into wafer thin cross sections and placed under an electron microscope. The cytopathic effect is observed at this point. Spikey ball like objects appear. Some are elongated, others are not. This is what virologists call viruses. Virologists don’t complete ANY controlled experiments. They just accept what they see and say that what they are witnessing are viruses.
Remember, these are desktop experiments that have no reference to a host. The cytopathic effect is accepted by virology as the presence of viruses.
A number of experts have completed ‘controlled experiments’ in recent years. A controlled experiment is where the same procedure is undertaken but does not include the ‘alleged’ infected mucous of a sick person. All the chemicals, DNA and resins are used and the same stringent protocols are executed. The cytopathic effect is observed. Spikey balls – some elongated – others not. These are consequences of the desktop (in vitro) experiment. This proves that viruses were NOT being witnessed in the primary experiment. What is being witnessed is an artifact of the experiment itself.
In order to boost their claims of cytopathic effect, virologists use a source of RNA. It is a matrix substance, not an ordinary yeast. It is added because when lung fluid is placed in the cell culture it results in a large amount of nucleic acids. With the help of RNA they try to mimic human sputum. This neutral substance is not pathogenic.
By stringing fragments of nucleic acid strands together and saying this is what the virus looks like is an absurdity, abhorrent and utter disgrace to anyone with an ounce of integrity. No virus has ever been isolated.
Here is a quote from a journal entitled ‘Viruses’ in 2020: (THE ROLE OF EXTRACELLULAR VESICLES (EVs) AS ALLIES OF HIV, HCV AND SARS VIRUS):
“Nowadays, it is an almost impossible mission to separate EV’s and viruses by means of canonical vesicle isolation methods, such as differential ultracentrifugation, because they are frequently co-pelleted due to their similar dimension. To overcome the problem, different studies have proposed the separation of EVs from virus particle by exploiting their different migration velocity in a density gradient or using the presence of specific markers that distinguish viruses from EVs. However, to date, a reliable method that can actually guarantee a complete separation DOES NOT EXIST.”
Author’s explanation = NO VIRUS HAS EVER BEEN ISOLATED. This is demonstrated by the controlled ‘cytopathic’ effect experiment.
Dr Stefan Lanka (PHD) a German microbiologist: states that nobody has ever isolated any alleged pathogenic virus. Isolating means separating it from other genetic material. No virus has even been seen in blood samples, saliva samples or tissue. Dr Lanka states that electron microscopes have never seen a virus in any body fluid sample. In contrast, bacteria has been isolated, observed and categorised. The belief remains that if a patient has believed infectious disease and bacteria cannot be observed, then a virus must be the poison.
The internet provides a myriad of documents that can be found claiming isolation of viruses with supporting electron microscopy images. They have been used by such propogandists as Reuters Fact Check and Factcheck.org. Titles such as: MORPHOMETRY OF SARS-COV-2 PARTICLES IN ULTRATHIN SECTIONS OF INFECTED VERO CELL CULTURES is a typical grandiosity. Controlled cytopathic effect experiments negate all these findings.
Louis Pasteur, hailed as the father of virology, never proved the existence of a virus. His primary interest was in the fermentation of wines and how spores could influence growth and death in plants. One of the greatest plagiarists in human history – he stole his ideas from a colleague – Professor Pierre Bechamp. Louis Pasteur theorised that an airborne virus may exist – but never proved it. His theory caught on and was further weaponised by John Enders (Rockefeller Institute) in the 1950s. The Rockefellers had a vast amount of unused petroleum product and infiltrated medical schools with funding that allowed the theory of contagion to spread. Their goal was to use the petroleum in vaccines.
What is a virus genome sequence or viral sequencing?
Virologists state the following:
‘The genome sequence of a virus is the sequence or order of bases or letters that makes up a virus’s genetic material, or its genome. If you were to write down the genome sequence of a particular coronavirus, it would be a series of about 30,000 letters. The key is to get them in just the right order that you find them in a particular virus.
In the case of RNA, scientists use the letters A, C, G, and U, which stand for each of the four RNA bases: adenine, cytosine, guanine, and uracil. It’s the same for DNA, except it’s a T for thymine in place of uracil. The process scientists use to figure out the right order of letters in a certain sample of virus is called genome sequencing.’
Authors note: NO VIRUS HAS EVER BEEN ISOLATED. To ‘isolate’ means separating it from other material. This has NEVER been done. Extravesicular vesicles (EVs) are indistinguishable from an ‘alleged’ virus because they are the same entity. This is observed in a controlled ‘cytopathic effect’ experiment. Therefore ANY ‘alleged’ genome composition is pure science fiction. Variants DO NOT exist for the same reason. These are computer modelling constructs that have nothing to do with an ‘isolated virus.’ Virus structure is unknown because viruses have never been isolated and categorised. Spike protein is NOT obtained from ANY virus. Studies show that they do NOT get this protein from the virus. They use a ‘recombinant protein’ in the laboratory using computer-generated genetic sequences. This is not a real spike protein from a virus.
In my next primer I will be giving key points on nitric oxide and interstitial lung disease. A cascade of events in the body – initially impacting mitochondria (energy cells).
The primary signs and symptoms of interstitial lung disease are:
• Shortness of breath at rest or aggravated by exertion
• Dry cough
Source:
Nitric Oxide and Peroxynitrite in Health and Disease. National Institute of Health (NIH)
‘The truth will be hidden in their face so closely they will be unable to focus upon it until it is too late.’
J.D. Rockefellers’ Secret Covenant
Author: Colin Edge
18/06/2023
Reply
Ken Coffman
| #
The first time I heard that COVID-19 was the world’s first 100% digital virus–which exists only as computer models–was from Eric Coppolino. He and his team have done great work.
https://audio.pwfm.tech/documents/covid-chronology-5.2.2.pdf
I haven’t fully committed to the belief that viruses don’t exist, but I do embrace terrain theory. Take care of your “terrain” and you won’t have to worry about viruses, existent or not.
Reply