18 Reasons I Won’t Be Getting a Covid Vaccine

Written by deconstructingconventional.com on . Posted in Current News

A few friends have asked my thoughts on the covid jab(s) so I thought it was time to write an article on the topic. All my friends had not heard most of the details I shared, so I figured you might appreciate hearing some of what I told them.

Knowing how contentious this issue is, part of me would rather just write about something else, but I feel like the discussion/news is so one-sided that I should speak up.

As I always strive to do, I promise to do my best to be level-headed and non-hysterical.

I’m not here to pick a fight with anyone, just to walk you through some of what I’ve read, my lingering questions, and explain why I can’t make sense of these covid vaccines.

THREE GROUND RULES FOR DISCUSSION

If you care to engage on this topic with me, excellent.

Here are the rules…

I am more than happy to correspond with you if…

  1. You are respectful and treat me the way you would want to be treated.

  2. You ask genuinely thoughtful questions about what makes sense to you.

  3. You make your points using sound logic and don’t hide behind links or the word “science.” In other words, make a kind, level-headed argument (links welcome), but don’t just post a link and say “read the science.” That’s intellectually lazy.

If you do respond, and you break any of those rules, your comments will be ignored/deleted.

With that out of the way, let me say this…

I don’t know everything, but so far no one has been able to answer the objections below.

So here are the reasons I’m opting out of the covid vaccine.

#1: VACCINE MAKERS ARE IMMUNE FROM LIABILITY

The only industry in the world that bears no liability for injuries or deaths resulting from their products, are vaccine makers.

First established in 1986 with the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, and reinforced by the PREP Act, vaccine makers cannot be sued, even if they are shown to be negligent.

The covid-vaccine makers are allowed to create a one-size-fits-all product, with no testing on sub-populations (i.e. people with specific health conditions), and yet they are unwilling to accept any responsibility for any adverse events or deaths their products cause.

If a company is not willing to stand behind their product as safe, especially one they rushed to market and skipped animal trials on, I am not willing to take a chance on their product.

No liability. No trust.

Here’s why…

#2: THE CHECKERED PAST OF THE VACCINE COMPANIES

The four major companies who are making these covid vaccines are/have either:

  1. Never brought a vaccine to market before covid (Moderna and Johnson & Johnson).

  2. Are serial felons (Pfizer, and Astra Zeneca).

  3. Are both (Johnson & Johnson).

Moderna had been trying to “Modernize our RNA” (thus the company name)–for years, but had never successfully brought ANY product to market–how nice for them to get a major cash infusion from the government to keep trying.

In fact, all major vaccine makers (save Moderna) have paid out tens of billions of dollars in damages for other products they brought to market when they knew those products would cause injuries and death–see Vioxx, Bextra, Celebrex, Thalidomide, and opioids as a few examples.

In case it hasn’t sunk in, let me reiterate…3 of the 4 covid vaccine makers have been sued for products they brought to market even though they knew injuries and deaths would result.

Let me reiterate this point:

Given the free pass from liability, and the checkered past of these companies, why would we assume that all their vaccines are safe and made completely above board?

Where else in life would we trust someone with that kind of reputation?

To me that makes as much sense as expecting a remorseless, abusive, unfaithful lover to become a different person because a judge said deep down they are a good person.

No. I don’t trust them.

No liability. No trust.

Here’s another reason why I don’t trust them.

#3: THE UGLY HISTORY OF ATTEMPTS TO MAKE CORONAVIRUS VACCINES

There have been many attempts to make viral vaccines in the past that ended in utter failure, which is why we did not have a coronavirus vaccine in 2020.

In the 1960’s, scientists attempted to make an RSV (Respiratory Syncytial Virus) vaccine for infants.

In that study, they skipped animal trials because they weren’t necessary back then.

In the end, the vaccinated infants got much sicker than the unvaccinated infants when exposed to the virus in nature, with 80 percent of the vaccinated infants requiring hospitalization, and two of them died.

After 2000, scientists made many attempts to create coronavirus vaccines.

For the past 20 years, all ended in failure because the animals in the clinical trials got very sick and many died, just like the children in the 1960’s.

You can read a summary of this history/science here.

Or if you want to read the individual studies you can check out these links:

The typical pattern in the studies mentioned above is that the children and the animals produced beautiful antibody responses after being vaccinated.

The manufacturers thought they hit the jackpot.

The problem came when the children and animals were exposed to the wild version of the virus.

When that happened, an unexplained phenomenon called Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE) also known as Vaccine Enhanced Disease (VED) occurred where the immune system produced a “cytokine storm” (i.e. overwhelmingly attacked the body), and the children/animals died.

Here’s the lingering issue…

The vaccine makers have no data to suggest their rushed vaccines have overcome that problem.

In other words, never before has any attempt to make a coronavirus vaccine been successful, nor has the gene-therapy technology that is mRNA “vaccines” been safely brought to market, but hey, since they had billions of dollars in government funding, I’m sure they figured that out.

Except they don’t know if they have…

#4: THE “DATA GAPS” SUBMITTED TO THE FDA BY THE VACCINE MAKERS

When vaccine makers submitted their papers to the FDA for the Emergency Use Authorization (Note: An EUA is not the same as a full FDA approval), among the many “Data Gaps” they reported was that they have nothing in their trials to suggest they overcame that pesky problem of Vaccine Enhanced Disease.

They simply don’t know–i.e. they have no idea if the vaccines they’ve made will also produce the same cytokine storm (and deaths) as previous attempts at such products.

As Joseph Mercola points out…

“Previous attempts to develop an mRNA-based drug using lipid nanoparticles failed and had to be abandoned because when the dose was too low, the drug had no effect, and when dosed too high, the drug became too toxic. An obvious question is: What has changed that now makes this technology safe enough for mass use?”

If that’s not alarming enough, here are other gaps in the data–i.e. there is no data to suggest safety or efficacy regarding:

  • Anyone younger than age 18 or older than age 55

  • Pregnant or lactating mothers

  • Auto-immune conditions

  • Immunocompromised individuals

  • No data on transmission of covid

  • No data on preventing mortality from covid

  • No data on duration of protection from covid

Hard to believe right?

In case you think I’m making this up, or want to see the actual documents sent to the FDA by Pfizer and Moderna for their Emergency Use Authorization, you can check out this, or this respectively. The data gaps can be found starting with page 46 and 48 respectively.

For now let’s turn our eyes to the raw data the vaccine makers used to submit for emergency use authorization.

#5: NO ACCESS TO THE RAW DATA FROM THE TRIALS

Would you like to see the raw data that produced the “90 and 95 percent effective” claims touted in the news?

Me too…

But they won’t let us see that data.

As pointed out in the BMJ, something about the Pfizer and Moderna efficacy claims smells really funny.

There were “3,410 total cases of suspected, but unconfirmed covid-19 in the overall study population, 1,594 occurred in the vaccine group vs. 1,816 in the placebo group.”

Wait…what?

Did they fail to do science in their scientific study by not verifying a major variable?

Could they not test those “suspected but unconfirmed” cases to find out if they had covid?

Apparently not.

Why not test all 3,410 participants for the sake of accuracy?

Can we only guess they didn’t test because it would mess up their “90-95 percent effective” claims?

Where’s the FDA?

Would it not be prudent for the FDA, to expect (demand) that the vaccine makers test people who have “covid-like symptoms,” and release their raw data so outside, third-parties could examine how the manufacturers justified the numbers?

I mean it’s only every citizen of the world we’re trying to get to take these experimental products…

Why did the FDA not require that? Isn’t that the entire purpose of the FDA anyway?

Good question.

Foxes guarding the hen house?

Seems like it.

No liability. No trust.

#6: NO LONG-TERM SAFETY TESTING

Obviously, with products that have only been on the market a few months, we have no long-term safety data.

In other words, we have no idea what this product will do in the body months or years from now–for ANY population.

Given all the risks above (risks that ALL pharmaceutical products have), would it not be prudent to wait to see if the worst-case scenarios have indeed been avoided?

Would it not make sense to want to fill those pesky “data gaps” before we try to give this to every man, woman, and child on the planet?

Well…that would make sense, but to have that data, they need to test it on people, which leads me to my next point…

#7: NO INFORMED CONSENT

What most who are taking the vaccine don’t know is that because these products are still in clinical trials, anyone who gets the shot is now part of the clinical trial.

They are part of the experiment.

Those (like me) who do not take it, are part of the control group.

Time will tell how this experiment works out.

But, you may be asking, if the vaccines are causing harm, wouldn’t we be seeing that all over the news?

Surely the FDA would step in and pause the distribution?

Well, if the adverse events reporting system was working, maybe things would be different.

#8: UNDER-REPORTING OF ADVERSE REACTIONS AND DEATH

According to a study done by Harvard (at the commission of our own government), less than 1% of all adverse reactions to vaccines are actually submitted to the National Vaccine Adverse Events Reports System (VAERS) – read page 6 at the link above.

While the problems with VAERS have not been fixed (as you can read about in this letter to the CDC), at the time of this writing VAERS reports over 2,200 deaths from the current covid vaccines, as well as close to 60,000 adverse reactions.

“VAERS data released today showed 50,861 reports of adverse events following COVID vaccines, including 2,249 deaths and 7,726 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and March 26, 2021.”

And those numbers don’t include (what is currently) 578 cases of Bell’s Palsy.

If those numbers are still only 1 percent of the total adverse reactions (or 0.8 to 2 percent of what this study published recently in the JAMA found), you can do the math, but that equates to somewhere around 110,000 to 220,000 deaths from the vaccines to date, and a ridiculous number of adverse reactions.

Bet you didn’t see that on the news.

That death number would currently still be lower than the 424,000 deaths from medical errors that happen every year (which you probably also don’t hear about), but we are not even six months into the rollout of these vaccines yet.

If you want a deeper dive into the problems with the VAERS reporting system, you can check this out, or check this out.

But then there’s my next point, which could be argued makes these covid vaccines seem pointless…

#9: THE VACCINES DO NOT STOP TRANSMISSION OR INFECTION

Wait, what?

Aren’t these vaccines supposed to be what we’ve been waiting for to “go back to normal”?

Nope.

Why do you think we’re getting all these conflicting messages about needing to practice social distancing and wear masks AFTER we get a vaccine?

The reason is because these vaccines were never designed to stop transmission OR infection.

If you don’t believe me, I refer you again to the papers submitted to the FDA I linked to above.

The primary endpoint (what the vaccines are meant to accomplish) is to lower your symptoms.

Sounds like just about every other drug on the market right?

That’s it…lowering your symptoms is the big payoff we’ve been waiting for.

Does that seem completely pointless to anyone but me?

  1. It can’t stop us from spreading the virus.

  2. It can’t stop the virus from infecting us once we have it.

  3. To get the vaccine is to accept all the risk of these experimental products and the best it might do is lower symptoms?

Heck, there are plenty of other things I can do to lower my symptoms that don’t involve taking what appears to be a really risky product.

Now for the next logical question:

If we’re worried about asymptomatic spreaders, would the vaccine not make it more likely that we are creating asymptomatic spread?

If it indeed reduces symptoms, anyone who gets it might not even know they are sick and thus they are more likely to spread the virus, right?

For what it’s worth, I’ve heard many people say the side effects of the vaccine (especially the second dose) are worse than catching covid.

I can’t make sense of that either.

Take the risk.

Get no protection.

Suffer through the vaccine side-effects.

Keep wearing your mask and social distancing…

And continue to be able to spread the virus.

What?

It gets worse.

#10: PEOPLE ARE CATCHING COVID AFTER BEING FULLY VACCINATED

Talk about a bummer.

You get vaccinated and you still catch covid.

In reality, this phenomenon is probably happening everywhere, but those are the ones making the news now.

Given the reasons above (and what’s below), maybe this doesn’t surprise you, but bummer if you thought the vaccine was a shield to keep you safe.

It’s not.

That was never the point.

If 66% of healthcare workers in L.A. are going to delay or skip the vaccine…maybe they aren’t wowed by the rushed science either.

Maybe they are watching the shady way deaths and cases are being reported…

To see the rest of the reasons, click here: deconstructingconventional.com

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Share via

Trackback from your site.

Comments (16)

  • Avatar

    e

    |

    Well done! And in Uttar Pradesh, India, where very few have been inoculated, Ivermectin is a major success.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Stephen

    |

    This is an excellent piece and aligns very much with my own thinking after read in a lot of diverse reports.

    #1: VACCINE MAKERS ARE IMMUNE FROM LIABILITY – already this one which I learnt very early on, said to me never to take this crap. No liability not trust.

    #10: PEOPLE ARE CATCHING COVID AFTER BEING FULLY VACCINATED – this just validates #1.

    Then there are all the reports of deaths/injuries and real health issues after the jab.
    https://yellowcard.ukcolumn.org/yellow-card-reports

    This database by Category of adverse reaction, is a fantastic piece of UK Column.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Cathleen Anderson

      |

      Agree! And lets add #11 – Endless boosters

      Reply

    • Avatar

      Herb Rose

      |

      Hi Stephen,
      Since the makers of these shots do not call them vaccines and they do not meet the legal definition of vaccine, as written in the law, the manufacturers are libel for any damages done by these treatments and I do not believe the governments emergency approval removes their responsibility for determining that their products are safe. Just calling something a vaccine does not grant immunity.
      Herb

      Reply

  • Avatar

    Scoobyvegan

    |

    And the other eight reasons are?

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Stephen

      |

      If you read the excellent article the other 8 reasons are actually listed. 1 and 10 + the UK Column database of ‘adverse reactions’ are all the reasons I need.

      Reply

  • Avatar

    Allan Shelton

    |

    The best summary yet.
    Thanks for that.
    I will be forwarding this article to many Canadian politicians.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Charles Higley

    |

    “To get the vaccine is to accept all the risk of these experimental products and the best it might do is lower symptoms?”

    However, the jabs promote ADE and also suppress the immune system, which more than cancels out any fantasy that the jabs lessening symptoms. Jabbed people get infected more easily, have higher viral loads produced by their own T-cells which invite the viral in to replicate, get sicker than normal, and die more often. Yeah, that’s what we need.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    tom0mason

    |

    Dear Doctor or medical professional,
    In supplement to the list provide please explain how trying to get me to get injected does not violate the “First do no harm” that most doctor sign or swear to.
    Yes, I do understand that that here in the UK “British Medical Association (BMA) drafted a new Hippocratic Oath for consideration by the World Medical Association in 1997 but it was not accepted and there is still no one single modern accepted version. (see https://www.mvorganizing.org/who-takes-the-hippocratic-oath/ )
    Maybe this probably explains why such people like Dr. Harold Shipman was allowed to get away with so many murders (see_https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_Shipman) because NHS is basically a secretive organisation that precludes an overriding philosophy and actions to ensure that “First do no harm” is upheld. .
    (Also see —
    A nurse has been convicted of murdering two patients and poisoning 20 others at a Greater Manchester hospital. Victorino Chua killed Tracey Arden, 44, and Derek Weaver, 83 See_https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-32782153 and_https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11614593/Stepping-Hill-killer-nurse-Victorino-Chua-jailed-for-life.html

    BABY-KILLER nurse Beverley Allitt, named The Angel of Death, is fighting for life with suspected sepsis. Staff at Rampton high-security hospital raised the alarm after the 49-year-old, who murdered four tots and attacked nine others, fell ill. from_https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/6830651/angel-of-death-sepsis-battle/

    Colin Norris: Serial killer nurse case referred to Court … The case of a nurse who was was jailed for life for murdering four patients and attempting to kill a fifth has been referred to the Court of Appeal. Colin Norris, 45, was convicted in 2008 of … see also_https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-43216615

    Nov 11, 2020 | A nurse is due in court charged with eight counts of murder following an investigation into baby deaths at the Countess of Chester hospital neonatal unit in Cheshire. Lucy Letby, 30, is due to …
    See_https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/nov/11/nurse-lucy-letby-charged-with-murder-over-chester-hospital-baby-deaths

    A nurse stood accused yesterday of trying to kill elderly patients to free up hospital beds. Ward sister Barbara Salisbury, 47, administered drug overdoses or withdrew oxygen supplies in her twisted ‘efficiency’ campaign, a jury was told. See more_https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-300787/Nurse-tried-kill-patients-free-beds.html )

    Tell me doctor/medical professional do YOU agree with the idea of “First do no harm”, if not please explain why.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Robert Beatty

    |

    This raises a bigger question in my mind: What is the point of this ‘vaccine’ strategy?
    The world’s awareness of a ‘pandemic’ in search of a vaccine came from the UN’s WHO body, and the UN also hosts the IPCC research. Both initiatives seriously impact the stability of western democracies. What an amazing coincidence.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Eric the Red

    |

    Thanks, this is an excellent article, perfect for a summary reference to jumpstart further discussion. I’d like to recommend another reason to add to the list. Just what, if any, is the data on how unvaccinated, asymptomatic people are somehow spreading the disease? Not only the data, but also an explanation describing steps in the immune system as to how it may happen. To me, in this undeclared war, that’s the crux of the matter: The vaxx tyrants must prove that asymptomatic unvaccinated people, regardless of any prior infection and/or natural immunity, are dangerous carriers. Every piece of their tyrannical program depends on it. So far, they’ve just been mouthing empty assertions, and/or trying to baffle us with BS. But hard data from repeatable studies is MIA. Since they can’t prove any such thing, it should all come crashing down like a house of cards. The only thing that sustains it is people’s refusal to address it head on. I’d strongly urge everyone to keep hammering on this one key issue, as well as instigate some legal action that demands such proof. Until then, we have a lot of uncoordinated activity that the tyrants are easily ignoring.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Climate Heretic

    |

    There are currently problems getting the web page to display. First it displays the page very briefly then it the page refreshes with an error. This also applies to 17 more reasons I won’t be getting a the vaccine.

    I have got copies of the pages and the waybackmachine also has copies of these web pages.

    Regards
    Climate Heretic

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Climate Heretic

      |

      Sorry, I should clarify the original web site links are not displaying properly.

      Regards
      Climate Heretic

      Reply

  • Google

    |

    Google

    Always a big fan of linking to bloggers that I adore but don’t get a whole lot of link adore from.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Bertie MacBeetle.

      |

      DuckDuckGo gives the results google buries

      Reply

  • Google

    |

    Google

    Every as soon as in a though we opt for blogs that we read. Listed beneath are the most current web pages that we opt for.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via