1000 Peer-Reviewed Studies Questioning the Safety of Covid Shots
How many of them do you think the CDC consulted before adding the shots to the childhood immunization schedule? (Also: a word about “rarity”.)
Peer Reviewed Medical Papers Submitted To Various Medical Journals, Evidencing A Multitude Of Adverse Events In Covid-19 Vaccine Recipients.
Download it. There’s a download link on the page for the entire list as a PDF. Send it to your elected officials. Send it to your school boards.
My previous list (#49 here) (I think from Malone and a few others) had something like 158 studies. I was way off.
This one breaks it down into the following categories:
Myocarditis: 226 studies.
Thrombosis: 150 studies.
Thrombocytopenia: 115 studies.
Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: 61 studies
Vasculitis: 43 studies.
Guillain-Barré Syndrome: 43 Studies.
Lymphademopathy: 35 studies.
Anaphylaxis: 30 studies.
Myopericarditis: 21 studies.
Allergic Reactions: 20 studies
Bell’s Palsy: 18 studies
Axillary adenopathy: 18 studies
Pericarditis: 15 studies.
Etc.
I was thinking of putting together a list like this myself, but I think they’ve done a better job than I can do, and I had no idea it would be 1000 entries long.
On “Rarity”
Many of these studies contain the word “rare”.
Ah, but see I know a thing or two about language, and how tricksy and misleading it can be, even (or maybe especially) in a scientific context.
“Rare” means the authors can distance themselves from cause-effect relationship they’re identifying.
“It’s horrible… but don’t worry! It’s rare. Ahem. Nothing to see here.”
So, let’s have it out about “rarity”, once and for all.
Let’s say your study shows that of 7800 kids receiving your shot, 10 had to be hospitalized.
Okay, that’s pretty “rare”. 1 in 780.
Now I want you to imagine a politician moving through a massive crowd of people, shaking hands and kissing babies. Let’s say, in a particularly grueling day of politicking, he shakes hands with 7800 people. Well and good.
One problem, though: after every 779th handshake or so, he pulls out a pistol and shoots the 780th person in the chest.
Then he carries right on handshaking.
Would you say, “Oh, but that’s a rare phenomenon. For the most part, he’s a safe and effective handshaker”?
Or, after the first couple attempted murders would you get the hint and stop him?
Would you actually let him get to 7800 handshakes, and count the ten new hospitalized gunshot victims as an “acceptable” loss?
And if so, what does that make you?
And what does that make you if you change the 7800 people in the example to children under 5 years of age?
If you’re one of these study authors, I’d really like to know something: does including the word “rare” allow you to keep your grant or job?
And if you’re one of these authors and you’re not hopping up and down to stop the CDC adding these shots to their childhood immunization schedule, I wonder why you did this study in the first place, and more broadly, why you entered science as a career.
Wasn’t it to, I don’t know… “help humanity”?
No time like the present.
See more here substack.com
Header image: David Goldman
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
JustMe
| #
Safe and effective for Pharma profits and government control
Reply
Roo63
| #
Good article, many thanks.
They’ve NO intention of stopping these Genetic Experiments, James and you know it.
For the Human Race, their Agenda means to: Experiment, Transform and Destroy. Destroy being the key word, as they will destroy any survivors of the Genetic Experiments, once they have served their purpose, anyway.
From the 23rd November, they are rolling out the Flu injections in English Primary Schools, with any hesitation being met with the Nasal Spray variety.
To the best of my limited knowledge, the Flu “Vaccines” became “mRNA” Experiments back in 2019, so I very much doubt the 2022 batches should be any different?
So, unless it is proven otherwise, ALL injections alleged to be “Vaccines” must now be considered suspect, because they are intent on getting that toxic crap in to ALL our Children one way or another.
All the best, James.
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
The vaccines’ fakeness was described in one of my earlier blogs (July 20, 2020), i.e., before the introduction of the vaccines, stating,
“… it is impossible to develop a proper vaccine because, as noted, one cannot monitor the virus or disease and then how the vaccine’s effectiveness will be established. It cannot be! Therefore, a fake vaccine will most likely be developed to satisfy the regulatory wish and calm down the created public hysteria and fear. Unfortunately, if developed and administered, such vaccines will undoubtedly create potentially dangerous side effects, without any presumed benefits, by interfering with the body’s immune system and other related physiological processes.” (https://bioanalyticx.com/science-for-the-pandemic-at-the-authorities-false-in-fact-fraudulent-requires-urgent-action/).
Actual science clearly predicted the vaccine’s tragic outcome, as is now being observed in the population.
With due respect to physicians, as they lack appropriate training and experience as scientists, it is humbly suggested that they seek help from scientists who work with chemicals/medicines and isolate and characterize such (https://bioanalyticx.com/origin-of-the-virus/).
Reply