Unraveling The Controversy Around Ivermectin Tablets

The controversy that erupted during the early days of the Rona Regime regarding Ivermectin tablets is about as thick as a 30-year-old bottle of syrup you’d find in the back of a grandma’s pantry.

Some folks swore by it, while others claimed that snake oil salesmen were peddling harmful wares. So, what’s the deal with these little white Ivermectin tablets? Let’s unpack them like a Christmas present from a weird uncle. Carefully.

The World Health Organization and the FDA didn’t exactly roll out the red carpet for this drug as a COVID-19 treatment. They’ve been more like the bouncers at a trendy nightclub, turning away anyone who dares mention Ivermectin’s name

Why the cold shoulder? 

In December 2021, the FDA warned Americans not to use Ivermectin, which “is intended for animals” to treat or prevent COVID-19.

“Health Experts” claimed there wasn’t enough concrete evidence, but in truth, they censored many studies and manipulated others. They didn’t want you to consider that Ivermectin tablets may be a magic bullet. Instead, they wanted you to believe you were spinning the wheel of scientific uncertainty.

The woke left, who are brainwashed in Rockefeller medicine, frowned upon the whole DIY pharmacy situation. God forbid you treat yourself. They mocked us and said we were playing doctor with a medical degree from Google University. The gaslighting reminded us that humans aren’t horses and that self-medication is a risky game.

Before you start popping Ivermectin tablets like Tic Tacs, let’s remember they needed to eradicate therapeutics to justify their Emergency Use Authorization.

The Emergency Use Authorization states:

“For the FDA to issue an EUA, there must be no adequate, approved, and available alternative candidate product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition.” So, the propagandists told you Ivermectin was a “dangerous horse dewormer.”

They had to smear and discredit ivermectin. And in doing so, critical care physician Dr. Pierre Kory says, “That has caused millions of people to die around the world.”

A group of brave doctors filed a federal lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) over the agencies’ unlawful attempts to block the use of ivermectin in treating COVID-19.

And, in late March 2024, the FDA lost its war on ivermectin and agreed to remove all social media posts and consumer directives regarding ivermectin and COVID, including its most popular tweet in FDA history.

This landmark case sets an important precedent in limiting FDA overreach into the doctor-patient relationship. Unfortunately, the jab has damaged millions.

History of Ivermectin:

  1. Discovery: Ivermectin was discovered in the late 1970s by Japanese microbiologist Satoshi Ōmura (same first name as the guy who invented Bitcoin) and Irish pharmacologist William C. Campbell. Their work led to the isolation of a compound from the bacterium Streptomyces avermitilis, which exhibited potent antiparasitic properties.
  2. Nobel Prize: In recognition of their groundbreaking discovery, Ōmura and Campbell were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2015.
  3. Antiparasitic Use: Since its introduction in the early 1980s, Ivermectin has been widely used to treat various parasitic infections in humans and animals. It has played a crucial role in global efforts to control diseases such as river blindness and lymphatic filariasis, particularly in regions where these infections are endemic.
  4. Off-Label Use: Ivermectin has garnered attention over the years for its potential applications beyond its original antiparasitic indications. Researchers have explored its efficacy in treating conditions such as scabies, head lice, and certain viral infections.
  5. COVID-19 Pandemic: Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, interest in repurposing existing drugs for the treatment of the novel coronavirus surged. Ivermectin emerged as a candidate worth investigating due to its antiviral properties, which were observed in laboratory studies. However, its use for COVID-19 remained controversial, with conflicting findings from clinical trials and regulatory agencies cautioning against its widespread use outside of controlled clinical settings.

According to a June 2020 study published in the Antiviral Research Journal, a single dose of Ivermectin can kill 99.8 percent of the virus within 48 hours. A meta-analysis showed the drug reduced infection by an average of 86% when used preventively.

Benefits of Ivermectin Tablets – A Multi-targeted Drug

Ivermectin tablets have been around since the 1970s, originally known for their ability to rid you of pesky parasites. But things went haywire when they were hailed as a potential remedy against COVID-19. Studies suggested they could shorten the duration of symptoms and even reduce the risk of hospitalization.

“Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce the numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally,” according to a February 29, 2024, in Journal of Infection.

Specifically, the median recovery time was two days faster for those who took ivermectin.

The study also found that a smaller percentage of ivermectin recipients (1.6%) were hospitalized or died compared to 4% in the comparison group. That sure sounds a lot more effective than the so-called vaccines.

So, why did authorities vilify ivermectin? Because the COVID shots forced upon the world would not be able to exist if ivermectin was shown to be effective.

Health Benefits Of Ivermectin Tablets

  1. Antiparasitic Properties: Initially developed as an antiparasitic drug, Ivermectin has been highly effective in treating a variety of parasitic infections, including river blindness (onchocerciasis), strongyloidiasis, and lymphatic filariasis, among others.
  2. Potential Antiviral Activity: Some studies have suggested that Ivermectin may have antiviral properties. It has shown efficacy in inhibiting the replication of certain viruses, including some strains of influenza, Zika virus, and, more recently, SARS-CoV-2.

In light of the potential of ivermectin to prevent replication in a broad spectrum of viruses, the inhibition of importin α/β1-mediated nuclear import of viral proteins is suggested as the probable mechanism underlying its antiviral activity A possible ionophore role for ivermectin has also been reported. Since ionophore molecules have been described as potential antiviral drugs, ivermectin could ultimately induce an ionic imbalance that disrupts the potential of the viral membrane, thereby threatening its integrity and functionality.

  1. COVID-19 Treatment: Regardless of the establishment, Ivermectin can play a role in treating COVID-19. Several studies have suggested that it could reduce the severity of symptoms, decrease viral load, and potentially prevent transmission of the virus. However, further research is needed to establish its efficacy and safety in treating COVID-19 definitively.
  2. Well-Tolerated: Generally, Ivermectin is well-tolerated when used at appropriate doses for its approved indications. Side effects are usually mild and transient, including nausea, dizziness, and diarrhea.
  3. Cost-Effective: Ivermectin tablets are relatively inexpensive, making it accessible to populations in developing countries where parasitic infections are endemic.

The “C” Word IS The Real Reason “They” Don’t Want You To Have Ivermectin! 

They do NOT want you to know this:

Here are just a few of the “Anti-Cancer” Benefits Shown In Studies Published on the NIH Site 

  • Kills pancreatic, colon, and breast cancer cells! 

And the best part is that regular and even prolonged use of ivermectin shows little to absolutely no side effects!

That’s because ivermectin isn’t a typical drug. It’s actually a microorganism. Kind of like a probiotic. It was discovered in the soil just outside of a Japanese golf course. This stuff comes from the dirt, and it helps us more than almost anything else we have ever discovered in nature that we have applied to modern medicine.”

Source: Substack

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorpor

ated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.

Trackback from your site.

Comments (3)

  • Avatar

    Robert Webster

    |

    In Queensland Australia, if a doctor prescribed Ivermectin at the beginning of the plandemic, they would either lose their license, or be find thousands of dollars. It ‘s well know now, parasites cause cancer, and has the ability to reduce inflammation.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Wisenox

    |

    They’ve been pushing Ivermectin on people since the early days of the pandemic.
    Why do they want you to take it so bad?
    When I first looked into it, literature stated that Ivermectin was used in hen houses, but was stopped because it was toxic to humans, crosses breast milk, permeates the blood brain barrier and accumulates in the brain.

    At first, it was presented as a covid wonder drug, alleviating 95% of the <1% fatality risk of the phony virus.
    Today, Ivermectin is some kind of cancer curing godsend. Antifungals and antihelminth drugs are pushed heavily today, but literature doesn’t support their use.

    If Ivermectin does enhance blood brain barrier permeability, than it is very similar to the push for GLP-1 agonists, like Ozempic, which enhance gastrointestinal permeability.
    I’ll point out the obvious: barriers exists in our bodies for very very important reasons. Punching holes in them just doesn’t seem like a smart thing to do.
    I’ll also propose that labeling should be put on all medications, OTC or otherwise, to inform pregnant mothers that a product crosses breast milk.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Watching the World

      |

      Ivermectin does NOT cross the blood-brain barrier in humans. It has almost no side effects, and it’s bery inexpensive. It was not a money maker for the drug companies – that was the other reason it was vilified….

      Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via