Swiss Politician Wants ‘Climate Denial’ To Be A Criminal Offense

A Swiss ‘green’ politician is calling for ‘climate change denial’ to be made illegal

‘Climate change’ for some has turned into a real doomsday cult, where a small group of people has excessive control over its members and require unwavering devotion.

The climate cult members are in fact so brainwashed that they are convinced it’s the Gospel Truth and that disagreement is heresy of dangerous criminals.

So it’s not surprising some climate cult members are calling for a Catholic Church model Climate Inquisition to root out and punish the heresy.

Marcel Odermatt of Switzerland’s online WELTWOCHE reports on how one Swiss Green politician wants to make “climate-skeptic statements”, i.e. free speech, a criminal offense.

Green National Councillor Valentine Python (pictured), 47, is calling for climate denial” to be declared a crime.

Ms. Python believes statements casting doubt on man’s dominance over the global climate hinder efforts to educate children on the dangers of climate change, and so obstruct adopting “effective measures.”

28 percent Of Youth Ignore Climate Alarm

Germany’s Pleiteticker elaborates on why Ms. Python is agitated about people having other opinions, and cites a recent French study that found 28 percent of young people consider climate change to be a natural phenomenon against which no special measures are necessary.

Based on such results, Ms. Python claims there’s been a “decline in the scientific understanding of the world” and that the state needs to take action against “climate-skeptical statements.”

“She compares these [statements] to calls for anti-Semitism and racism. Such calls could lead to violence and would violate human rights.

The National Councillor believes that the ‘unrestricted dissemination of climate-skeptic viewscould fall under the same law”, reports Pleiteticker.

“Python seems to consider herself in possession of immutable scientific truth.

Apparently, Python is not interested in convincing dissenters, but in banning their thoughts and imposing penalties on them.

See more here climatechangedispatch

Editor’s note: this is reminiscent of US Sentaor Sheldon Whitehouse a few years ago, who wanted skeptics to be prosecuted under the RICO anti-racketeering laws.

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (8)

  • Avatar

    VOWG

    |

    Why are governments chock full of idiots and morons. Are the voters everywhere dumber than they were decades ago?

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Alan

      |

      It is voting that has made us dumb. We stupidly believed the polticians when they told us that democracy makes them our servants and that voting enables us to bring about change. The way they managed this was to ensure that the dumbest became dependent on the state.

      Reply

    • Avatar

      Tom

      |

      All the burger flipping jobs were taken. The only other jobs they qualify for are in government.

      Reply

    • Avatar

      aaron

      |

      Why do you believe ‘voting’ means anything or is in any way legit?

      a couple hand picked puppets to choose from is hardly meaningful or legit
      Just who gave these psychopathic authoritarians power over us?

      No-one, they took it and as long as people believe in their right to rule. nothing changes

      Reply

      • Avatar

        monkey*poops

        |

        there is major problem:
        handful of psychopaths believe and behave like they have all the power in the world and “we, the people” believe them 🙂

        Reply

  • Avatar

    Allan Shelton

    |

    Skeptics don’t deny climate change.
    We deny that cc is caused by mankind by way of emissions of CO2.
    That pol is just as stupid as 99% of them.
    They are incapable of distinguishing the difference.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Matthijs

    |

    Good, then they would have to legally define;
    Climate
    Climate change
    Anthropogenic climate change

    They can’t even define a spade.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Antonio

    |

    Pensa al clima però lei la signora è in carne ….come la mettiamo?

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via