Covid ‘Vaccine’ Victim Calls Out “Woefully Inadequate” Compensation

The Mail carries the harrowing story of a mother-of-three struggling to get by on the state support given to her after being left paralysed and forced to medically retire from work following the AstraZeneca Covid jab

Here’s an excerpt:

Like tens of thousands of Brits, Clare Bowie’s (pictured) life was turned upside down during the Covid pandemic.

But the 56 year-old from Dumbarton near Glasgow wasn’t left struggling for her life from the virus.

Instead, she was paralysed from the chest down after getting the AstraZeneca Covid vaccination in April 2021.

The mum-of-three worked as an admin officer at a submarine base for the ministry of defence for 37 years before she was forced to medically retire due to losing mobility in her hands.

However, Mrs. Bowie’s frustration lies with the “woefully inadequate” Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme, which doesn’t cover the cost of her mortgage or the cost of modifying her home for her level of disability. …

Initially doctors thought Mrs. Bowie had Guillian-Barre syndrome, which is a very rare and serious condition which affects the nerves that has been linked to complications with the first dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine.

But after six MRI scans at Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Glasgow, doctors diagnosed acute disseminated encephalitis complicated by transverse myelitis (ADEM), a condition that causes inflammation in the brain and spinal cord. …

Medics never had any doubts that her paralysis was caused by the vaccine.

Mrs. Bowie… recalls the consultant introducing himself and told her straight away: “I think it is Guillian-Barre syndrome and it’s because you took the vaccine.”

“I actually argued with him,” Mrs. Bowie said. “I couldn’t really believe it could be the vaccine.

“He said it is 100 percent the vaccine. He was absolutely definite on it and I am very grateful for that because I am assuming that’s why I got the vaccine damage payment.”

The Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme, which has been around since the 1970s, offers people, or their families, a tax-free sum of £120,000. …

Mrs. Bowie’s husband, Dave, 55, applied for the scheme in October 2021, while she was still in hospital. But the money wasn’t in her account until February 2023, a year and half after applying.

“It did take a while and you don’t really hear from them,” she said.

But after going through the process of applying to the Government scheme, Mrs. Bowie says it is “woefully inadequate” and “traumatic for people”.

She said: “You think £120,000 is massive. I have been in the civil service all my life, I wasn’t used to that money. But the bottom line is it doesn’t clear your mortgage and modify your house.”

In 1979, the scheme handed out £10,000 to people injured or killed by vaccines, this amount has been raised several times, but the current level (£120,000) was set in 2007.

But according to the Bank of England inflation calculator that is the equivalent of £195,183 meaning people are now losing out on about £75,000 in cash.

She said: “They go right back through your medical records. I’ve spoken to people who have been denied it because 10 years ago something happened to them. But I have been lucky and been a very healthy person so they can’t pinpoint it on anything else.”

Strict eligibility criteria means those affected must either have been killed or be left 60 percent disabled due to a vaccine.

This means a person theoretically judged to be only 59 percent disabled will not get a penny.

Worth reading in full.

See more here dailysceptic.org

Bold emphasis added

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About Covid 19

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (2)

  • Avatar

    VOWG

    |

    The poor intellectually deprived girl took the shots.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Howdy

    |

    No amount of monetary value can compensate for such afflictions, even if it covers existing debt.
    The arbitrary limit placed on the perceived level of ‘life value’ lost is not open to discussion as it should be. All should be eligible, but one is simply a number of digits on a database, and there has to be a set limit because of the cost, so the rest can ‘make do’.

    Money … You know the score.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via