A Pandora’s Box in the Pharma Lab
Some of my favorite stories in literature depict the disastrous consequences of HUBRIS.
The word comes from ancient Greek. In legal usage, it meant assault or sexual crimes and theft of public property. In religious usage it meant emulation of divinity or transgression against a god—the meaning of the word from which our modern usage derives.
Prometheus committed hubris by stealing fire from the gods and giving it to man. Pandora’s curiosity drove her to open the box that she was supposed to leave sealed. Eve ate fruit from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. In the modern era, Dr. Frankenstein is the archetypal “mad scientist” who tampers with nature without understanding the consequences, thereby creating and releasing a monster.
I thought about hubris on April 6, when I saw Bill Gates tell Trevor Noah on the Daily Show that “a vaccine is the only thing that will allow us to return to normal.” He also announced that his foundation was going to invest billions in building factories to make COVID-19 vaccines, even before seeing conclusive data on their efficacy. It was critically important, he claimed, to scale up manufacturing during testing instead of waiting for trial results.
Mark Suzman, CEO of the Gates Foundation, also gave an interview on CNN in which he stated it was imperative to fast-track vaccine development. “We then need to be ready to scale and manufacture that vaccine in literally hundreds of millions and billions of doses because it needs to go global when we have it,” he explained. The labs developing the vaccines had no choice but to succeed in quickly making safe and effective products. At that point, I knew that the heralded new vaccine was a done deal, a fait accompli, and that we would soon get it come hell or high water.
I therefore wasn’t surprised when I heard that Pfizer-BioNTech had dispensed with rigorous, painstaking, and time-consuming toxicology analysis of the product they developed at “Warp Speed.”
Recently I had a fascinating conversation with a veteran toxicologist named Helmut Sterz, who performed toxicology research for major pharmaceutical companies over a career spanning 1974-2009. From 2001-2009, Dr. Sterz was CEO of Global Research & Development at Pfizer’s lab in Amboise, France, where he was responsible for performing toxicology analysis of the company’s drug portfolio in Europe.
Dr. Sterz confirmed that Pfizer-BioNTech did not perform proper toxicology studies on its COVID-19 mRNA “vaccine” prior to its injection into hundreds of millions of people. Those responsible for this undertaking created the Pharma Lab equivalent of a Pandora’s Box that has released a host of sickness and death on mankind.
Please listen to my interview with Dr. Sterz and share it with your friends.
See more here Substack
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Wisenox
| #
“did not perform proper toxicology studies”
What is his base for this? Patents, ingredient list, or just blabber?
“Dr. Frankenstein is the archetypal “mad scientist” who tampers with nature without understanding the consequences”
As in ‘built from many parts’ (beast system)? Why frankie? Could’ve used Phillip Carvell (Utopia2), Osiris (egypt), Lupus (skylore), or even the Mad Hatter from Alice. Hell, could’ve have gone Star Wars.
“The word comes from ancient Greek”
So does the concept of destroying something you created, like a bank, just to steal from innocent people (Autolycus):
“Then after all the just man has turned out to be a thief. And this is a lesson which I suspect you must have learnt out of Homer; for he, speaking of Autolycus, the maternal grandfather of Odysseus, who is a favourite of his, affirms that”
Plato’s Republic
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
The photo shown for the article is a classical representation of the science/chemistry lab/equipment step-up. It is critical to know if the person in the photo has been trained and knowledgeable to use such a step-up.
In recent times, such photos appear regularly in medical, pharmaceutical, and virology/biology areas, where equipment is genuine, but the person’s representation might not be. They are often medical, pharmaceutical, and biology experts without relevant education and training in science/chemistry (scientists). They are making all kinds of false claims about science/chemistry (one being of science expert or scientist) for developing medicines – all false and fake.
Use caution when accepting and interpreting results from such experts and “scientists.”
Reply