Vaxxed people Six Times more likely to die from covid “variants”

Those who have been injected for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) are greater than six times more likely to die from a circulating “variant” like “Delta” than are unvaccinated people who just say no to strange experimental drugs from Tony Fauci and the government.

New data published by Public Health England on Friday found that compared to non-jabbed people, those who took the poison for the Chinese Virus are far more likely to suffer an excruciating death upon exposure to one of the many Wuhan Flu variants that the media says are spreading.

As it turns out, experimental gene therapy chemicals make the human immune system more prone to sudden death upon exposure to Chinese Germs than if that immune system was simply left alone to do its job naturally without pharmaceutical interventions.

Entitled, “SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and variants under investigation in England, Technical briefing 16,” a paper covering the data shows that Chinese Virus variants are pretty much a non-issue to begin with, as the vast majority of people who encounter them never even know it. The minute few who do end up dying with a variant more than likely already had the shot, research shows.

The even more minute few who did not get the shot and still end up dying after testing “positive” more than likely had a weakened immune system or some other health problem such as heart disease or obesity.

Most people have a zero percent chance of dying from a Chinese Virus “variant”

Public Health England even admits that the risk of dying with a Chinese Virus variant is exceptionally low, especially if a person has NOT received the jab.

Those who do take the jab are much more likely to suffer and die, it turns out, which apparently comes with the territory when trying to stay “safe.”

Even so, the fake news media is ratcheting up the propaganda about the spread of variants, calling it the fifth or sixth or whatever “wave” we are on now, all the while urging the public to get injected as many times as necessary to “flatten the curve.”

Despite the fact that the injections are now known to be spreading the variants, the lying news media is hoping that most people have very short-term memories and will forget the truth out of fear that they might once again test positive for the Wuhan Flu.

In addition to higher death rates, vaccinated people who test positive for a variant are more likely than the unvaccinated to require hospitalization for their Chinese cold.

According to the latest data, a full 2.0 percent of vaccinated people who test positive for the Delta variant require emergency care, compared to only 1.48 percent of unvaccinated people.

The current data is in keeping with data published last week by England’s public health agency that also showed a SIX TIMES GREATER death rate among the fully vaccinated than the unvaccinated and a hospital admission rate of 2.3 percent among those fully vaccinated at least two weeks earlier compared with just 1.2 percent among the unvaccinated,” further explains Celeste McGovern from LifeSiteNews.

All of this is only verifying what Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) research Stephanie Seneff warned about antibody-dependent enhancement, or ADE, which is basically vaccine-induced immune damage that makes a person more prone to getting sick.

It is conceivable to me that the laser-beam specificity of the induced antibodies is offset by a general weakening of innate immunity,” Seneff says. “I also suspect that massive vaccination campaigns may accelerate the rate at which the vaccine-resistant mutant strains become dominant among all the SARS-Co-V2 [coronavirus] strains.

To keep up with the latest nonsense about Chinese Virus “variants,” be sure to check out Pandemic.news.

See more here: afinalwarning.com

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (11)

  • Avatar

    Alan

    |

    I think this article draws conclusions that need proper investigation. The PHE report does not comment on any of the deaths in Table 6. But it does say that none of the 36 people being treated at the time of writing have died. There are only 42 deaths, and they amount to just over 0.1% of the total cases. It does not seem a very large sample on which to draw a conclusion six times more deaths of the vaccinated.

    We know the vaccination status, but we do not know anything about the age or health of any of the patients, or the cause of death. It might be possible that people with poor health have been more inclined to have the vaccine to protect themselves.

    There are numerous adverse incidents and deaths being reported and as far as I can see none have been properly investigated to establish a link with the vaccine.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Mary

      |

      Properly investigated? Seriously? Let’s see, if you are healthy and drop dead hours or days after the vaccine, what could that mean?

      Reply

      • Avatar

        Charles

        |

        “if you are healthy and drop dead hours or days after the vaccine, what could that mean?”

        Could mean a lot of things, proof of nothing.

        Reply

        • Avatar

          Rad1

          |

          As some wit said, “facts on the internet are like notes on a violin— infinite in number and almost all of them are wrong.” With this in mind, I saw a factlet that for people over 60, the death rate in the two weeks following “vaccination” is over 14 times that of any two week period In an unvaccinated control group. I assume that means matching for age, socioeconomic status, having robust numbers, etc. Since I didn’t see the study—I can’t recall even where I saw that story —I am just throwing this out for comment. If this were a serious study and done properly, warning bells should be ringing.

          Reply

  • Avatar

    Andrew Pilkington

    |

    Last Week…
    Monday: Phonecall from NHSVaccines (or whatever?), I missed it.
    Tuesday: Another phonecall from them. I was short of time, so the Lass said she’ll call back another day.
    Friday: Mobile text message from them, a “Reminder”, which goes nicely with the last 6/7 on my phone, from months ago.
    Saturday (Yesterday): A “Reminder” letter arrived for me and another “Identical” letter, for my Wife. We both last received the Same letter, Months ago, but she Refused their generous “Offer” in a single phonecall and they’ve been quiet until now.

    I know about the Bollocks they tell us regarding Safety and Efficacy, but I am told I am in the High Risk category, “Cholesterol” maybe? My point here, being: There is no way on Earth, that these Toxins have Ever been tested on anyone with the Rare genetic disability “SPG31” and certainly Not, someone on the same daily doses of “Big Pharma Candy”, I have each day? So that Proves to me that this is NOT about Saving our Lives.

    I’m a few rungs up on the ladder, but I figured on letting you know about that little gem, because they seem a bit desperate to me?

    Many thanks.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    just me

    |

    I prefer to take my chances with Ivermectin and HCQ and zinc etc. then with the experimental gene therapy “vaccine”.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      barry paul robinson

      |

      You don’t need any of those, there is no virus.

      Reply

  • Avatar

    barry paul robinson

    |

    You don’t need any of those, there is no virus.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Tom

    |

    In the first and foremost place, the major foundation pin for inventing a CoV-2 fear-based panic, the PCR test, is extremely flawed therefore there is no supporting truthful evidence for any varients if the main virus is questionable. As was the covid pandemic, the variant pandemic exists only in the rotted minds of the fake media.

    It would make some sense that injected persons, whose immune systems are now undergoing massive degenerative changes, are now more likely to attract more illnesses.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Luís

    |

    Jabbed more likely to die from ‘variants’? How is that possible if 1) C19 doesn’t exist – fails Koch Postulate – and 2) C19 jabs aren’t conventional vaccines, and 3) mutations and variants are never dangerous according to Prof Eucharist Bhakdi???
    We have to be consistent with what we believe and say; if we spend more than one year debunking c19 and the PCR tests as bogus, we cannot now say that the jabbed are more at risk of ‘variants’ [ghosts] than others!!!
    Keep it simple!!!

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Rad1

    |

    As some wit said, “facts on the internet are like notes on a violin— infinite in number and almost all of them are wrong.” With this in mind, I saw a factlet that for people over 60, the death rate in the two weeks following “vaccination” is over 14 times that of any two week period In an unvaccinated control group. I assume that means matching for age, socioeconomic status, having robust numbers, etc. Since I didn’t see the study—I can’t recall even where I saw that story —I am just throwing this out for comment. If this were a serious study and done properly, warning bells should be ringing.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via