on the sun driving climatic changes

Professor Of Physics & Mathematics at Northumbria University, Valentina Zharkova is a solar physicist who knows a lot about the sun.

For years we’ve been told that Earth is warming and it’s an absolute catastrophe thanks to ‘carbon’ emissions and human activity in general.

Oceans are rising and polar bears are dying and Antarctica is melting and it’s all your fault.

Except that it’s all nonsense.

Humans don’t affect Earth’s temperature.

The sun does.

In the video below, Valentina joined me for a conversation in which she uses slides to explain things. It’s rather complex, but the basic idea is that sun spots are a crucial vector.

See more here: jermwarfare.com

Header image: Researchgate

Editor’s note: In this image from Herrera et al, we see how sunspot activity matches planetary temperatures over the last one thousand years.

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (7)

  • Avatar

    DESALARY

    |

    I have made 100 DLR every hour in one day.That was my ideal day in my life and my boss b was very content with me..CNN is additionally intrigued from my work and is very happy..

    For more ……….————- …… Click My Profile

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Tom

    |

    Maybe…leftists think they control the sun.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      SteveP

      |

      They probably believe the sun is using fossil fuels.

      Reply

  • Avatar

    Gary Ashe

    |

    No they just think it shines out of their ass’es Tom.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    VOWG

    |

    I know a lot about the sun as well. One thing that is 100% factual is that without the sun the earth is a dead dry rock.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Krzysztof

    |

    A new detail about the influence of just the distance between the center of the system of EArth@Sun on the temperature. F.Vahrenholt,S.Luning, Die Kalte Sonne,AD 2012/Zimne Slonce (2014)/ Eng.(prob.)The Neglected Sun gives already similar info. ch4.@diagram 18 (based on IPCC AR4,2007) perfect basic mathematics how Propaganda manipulates statistical data. The authors give the main cause of Eddy’s (800-1200 years cycle) cycle (M.Zaharova – to Hallstatt, a double-time of Eddy’s).Both point out a very important data: how to count (or assume) the “zero” level of counting- the “natural” level of the oscillation of these cycles,i.e. the increase of 1C/150 years is a statistical junk, only about 0.5C would count for “unnatural”(still not a scientific term but a metaphor; all is a natural but only different type of causes) increase. I hope to get this papers on websites

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Krzysztof

    |

    A new detail about the influence of just the distance between the center of the system of EArth@Sun on the temperature. F.Vahrenholt,S.Luning, Die Kalte Sonne,(Ger.) AD 2012/Zimne Slonce (2014)/ Eng.(prob.)The Neglected Sun gives already similar info. ch4.@diagram 18 (based on IPCC AR4,2007) perfect basic mathematics of how Propaganda manipulates statistical data. The authors give the main cause of Eddy’s (800-1200 years cycle) cycle (M.Zaharova – to Hallstatt, a double-time of Eddy’s). Both point out a very important data: how to count (or assume) the “zero” level of counting- the “natural” level of the oscillation of these cycles,i.e. the increase of 1C/150 years is a statistical junk, only about 0.5C would count for “unnatural”(still not a scientific term but a metaphor; all is a natural but only different type of causes) increase. I hope to get these papers on websites

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via