20 Years of Climate Change

Hi! My name is Zoe, and I’m a highly respectable person and therefore a climate alarmist.

Humans are causing severe climate change and 99.999999+ bazillion percent of scientists agree. Only a few bad and uneducated people disagree. I will show them with sound reasoning why they are wrong.

Here’s the best evidence that humans are to blame:

First, there was a lot of warming over the last 20 years all over the planet. We can see this in the excellent CERES project data:

Look at that! An additional ~ +0.65 W/m2 coming from the surface. Merely showing warming is proof that humans caused it. But if that’s not enough for deniers like you, let’s proceed further.

We all know that ‘greenhouse gases’ trap heat and reduce outgoing radiation. Since obviously humans alone have risen the atmospheric CO2 content with their bad polluting, we should expect to see a decrease in outgoing radiation:

See? All good …. Wait …

Adding GHGs didn’t reduce outgoing radiation to space? There was an increase? That’s weird.

Well, surely to raise surface temperatures, the increase of GHGs in the atmosphere must be emitting more to the surface!

Hmm … pretty much stayed flat. That can’t explain the warming.

What about the sun?

Ha ha, solar power decreased. Checkmate stupid deniers.

Hmm, but what could it be? Let me check something else …

It looks like despite less solar power, there is more sun actually reaching the surface, and less sun reflected back to space. This extra ~0.72 W/m2 seems to cover all the surface warming completely.

I’m starting to see a complete lack of any role of CO2 in warming over the last 20 years.

But that’s OK. I’m a morally superior person, and I will still say that CO2 and humans did it … somehow. No evidence will change my mind because I already know better. It’s just the right thing to do.

— Satire Over —

So, yeah, any serious person going to argue that humans reduced the clouds and made the surface more absorptive?

The facts don’t support the climate change cult.

Any minor thing humans may have done in the last teo decades is completely washed out by nature.

The warming was completely induced on the solar shortwave side of the equation.

See more here: phzoe.com

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (8)

  • Avatar

    Alan Stewart

    |

    Extreme kudos to you Zoe. And, extreme prejudice to the Alarmists.
    Cheers

    Reply

  • Avatar

    SteveP

    |

    The first few lines not only summed up the activists but the smug MSM as well. The world has gone mad and we are on course now to destroy our economies on the basis of CO2 causing climate change even though it has never been proven.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Jerry Krause

      |

      Hi Steve P,

      SCIENCE cannot prove anything to be true, but reproducible observations (measurements) can prove accepted ideas (theories) to be absolutely wrong. Meteorologists have long measured atmospheric temperatures and atmospheric dew point temperature at the same place and time. And the atmospheric temperature has never been measured to be less than the atmospheric dew point temperature measured at the same place and temperature. Which consistent measurements constitute a SCIENTIFIC LAW. An accepted prediction of the theory termed the greenhouse effect of atmospheric carbon dioxide is that, if all the carbon dioxide was removed from the atmosphere, the measured atmospheric would decrease about 33C (58F). Which obviously cannot happen because of the well established SCIENTIFIC LAW.

      My question for you is : are you going to accept that which I have just reviewed for you and all PSI Readers?

      Have a good day, Jerry

      Reply

      • Avatar

        SteveP

        |

        Perhaps if I understood whatever it is you’re talking about I might accept it.

        Reply

        • Avatar

          Kevin Doyle

          |

          Steve,
          You will learn to ignore Jerry.
          He is the kid who seeks attention. Probably, didn’t get enough hugs as a child.

          Reply

        • Avatar

          Jerry Krause

          |

          Hi Kevin,

          I can image that Aristotle, if he was alive nearly 2000 years later, might have said the same thing about Galileo.

          Have a good day, Jerry

          Reply

  • Avatar

    Tom

    |

    My climate is changing this week from a high of 95 degrees to a high of 65 degrees over 5 days. Where is the trend? Summer is around the corner and the weather is still in Spring mode.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Jerry Krause

    |

    Hi Steve P,

    MY first statement was: “SCIENCE cannot prove anything to be true, but reproducible observations (measurements) can prove accepted ideas (theories) to be absolutely wrong.” I had written this because you had written: “on the basis of CO2 causing climate change even though it has never been proven.” No presently accepted theory of SCIENCE has been proven to be TRUE as the word TRUE is defined. SCIENCE based on reproducible observation and measurements. These observation and measurements are the truths of SCIENCE until there are more accurate measurements or observations..

    Example, for a while it was proposed that water was an element. Then a technology was invented th termed: electrolysis. Which could separate water into two gases (which became named hydrogen and oxygen). And the volume ratio of these two gases was always two volumes of hydrogen to one volume oxygen. Which suggested the fact that the compound water always had a definite composition of these two elements. At one time generic salt was accepted as being elementary matter, but electrolysis was able to separate our table salt into a reactive metal (sodium) and a reactive gas (chlorine). The portion of one element to the other element were tricker to establish but people (alchemist) did. Alchemists are still commonly thought to have been idiots because they tried and tried to turn dense (heavy) matter (lead, an metallic element) into gold (another metallic element) because some ‘brilliant’ Greek philosophers had decided that the 4 forms of elementary matter were air, water, earth and fire. So these alchemists invented furnace after furnace to generate a greater temperatures until they melted sand into a transparent (to the solar radiation which their eyes and our eyes can see) matter we call glass. And artisans learned how to work this molten glass into hollow balls and they never looked back as they made vessels of different practical shapes from glass and glass tubing from which thermometers were made. But these practical idiots are still considered by some modern chemists whose writing I have read.

    Your problem, not mine, is that you evidently do not know much about the early history of alchemists who eventually did the experiments which allowed John Dalton, a school teacher, to conclude that matter was composed tiny, but finite, particles that were termed atoms. This idea instead of matter being endlessly divisible into ever smaller particles as those brilliant Greek philosophers had concluded more than 2000 years earlier.

    I have spent more than 50 years studying chemistry, physics, and other physical sciences as they relate to practical matters. Perhaps if you had spent a tenth of that time reading elementary textbooks of these sciences you could understood whatever it is that I am talking about. But you would need to find textbooks that were written about 50 years ago. For it seems the authors of most modern textbooks have forgotten the elementary history of their science.

    So there are still two old wrong, but wrong, theories of Elementary Science which are still generally accepted because recent textbook authors seem to not know much more than you do about the history of their science and that of SCIENCE in general.

    Have a good day, Jerry

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via